Split Liver Transplantation: An Analytical Decision Support Model

References

• Akan M, Alagoz O, Ata B, Erenay FS, Said A (2012) A broader view of designing the liver allocation system. Oper. Res. 60(4):757–770.Link, Google Scholar
• Akshat S, Ma L, Raghavan S (2023) Improving broader sharing to address geographic inequity in liver transplantation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(4):1509–1526.Google Scholar
• Alagoz O, Maillart LM, Schaefer AJ, Roberts MS (2007) Choosing among living-donor and cadaveric livers. Management Sci. 53(11):1702–1715.Link, Google Scholar
• Ata B, Ding Y, Zenios S (2021) An achievable-region-based approach for kidney allocation policy design with endogenous patient choice. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(1):36–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Farias VF, Trichakis N (2011) The price of fairness. Oper. Res. 59(1):17–31.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Farias VF, Trichakis N (2013) Fairness, efficiency, and flexibility in organ allocation for kidney transplantation. Oper. Res. 61(1):73–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Papalexopoulos T, Trichakis N, Wang Y, Hirose R, Vagefi PA (2020) Balancing efficiency and fairness in liver transplant access: Tradeoff curves for the assessment of organ distribution policies. Transplantation 104(5):981–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Celdir ME, Akan M, Tayur S (2025) Dynamic exception points for fair liver allocation. Service Sci. 17(1):1–17.Link, Google Scholar
• Cox DR, Oakes D (2018) Analysis of Survival Data (Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong J, Perry O (2020) Queueing models for patient-flow dynamics in inpatient wards. Oper. Res. 68(1):250–275.Link, Google Scholar
• Emre S, Umman V (2011) Split liver transplantation: An overview. Transplantation Proc. 43(3):884–887.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Chan CW, Dong J (2022) Optimal scheduling of proactive service with customer deterioration and improvement. Management Sci. 68(4):2533–2578.Google Scholar
• Kamath PS, Kim WR (2007) The model for end-stage liver disease (meld). Hepatology 45(3):797–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim SP, Gupta D, Israni AK, Kasiske BL (2015) Accept/decline decision module for the liver simulated allocation model. Health Care Management Sci. 18:35–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim TW, Roberts J, Strudler A, Tayur S (2022) Ethics of split liver transplantation: Should a large liver always be split if medically safe? J. Medical Ethics 48(10):738–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larranaga M, Ayesta U, Verloop IM (2013) Dynamic fluid-based scheduling in a multi-class abandonment queue. Performance Evaluation 70(10):841–858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mogul DB, Perito ER, Wood N, Mazariegos GV, VanDerwerken D, Ibrahim SH, Mohammad S, et al. (2020) Impact of acuity circles on outcomes for pediatric liver transplant candidates. Transplantation 104(8):1627–1632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• NHS (2022) National liver offering scheme. Accessed February 18, 2022, https://www.odt.nhs.uk/odt-structures-and-standards/odt-hub-programme/national-liver-offering-scheme/.Google Scholar
• OPTN, UNOS (2016) Split versus whole liver transplantation: OPTN/UNOS Ethics Committee. Accessed April 5, 2025, https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/professionals/by-topic/ethical-considerations/split-versus-whole-liver-transplantation/.Google Scholar
• OPTN, UNOS (2022a) UNOS liver data. Accessed March 10, 2022, https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/view-data-reports/national-data/.Google Scholar
• OPTN, UNOS (2022b) UNOS liver policy. Accessed March 10, 2022, https://unos.org/policy/liver/distribution/.Google Scholar
• OPTN/UNOS Kidney Transplantation Committee (2008) Kidney allocation concepts: Request for information. Accessed April 5, 2025, https://www.asts.org/docs/default-source/optn-unos/proposed-kidney-allocation-concepts-rfi-september-24-2008.pdf.Google Scholar
• Perito ER, Roll G, Dodge JL, Rhee S, Roberts JP (2019) Split liver transplantation and pediatric waitlist mortality in the United States: Potential for improvement. Transplantation 103(3):552–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rawls J (2001) A Theory of Justice, revised edition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sandıkçı B, Maillart LM, Schaefer AJ, Alagoz O, Roberts MS (2008) Estimating the patient’s price of privacy in liver transplantation. Oper. Res. 56(6):1393–1410.Link, Google Scholar
• Segev D (2009) Evaluating options for utility-based kidney allocation. Amer. J. Transplantation 9(7):1513–1518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi P, Chou MC, Dai JG, Ding D, Sim J (2016) Models and insights for hospital inpatient operations: Time-dependent ed boarding time. Management Sci. 62(1):1–28.Link, Google Scholar
• Su X, Zenios SA (2006) Recipient choice can address the efficiency-equity trade-off in kidney transplantation: A mechanism design model. Management Sci. 52(11):1647–1660.Link, Google Scholar
• Tunç S, Sandıkçı B, Tanriöver B (2022) A simple incentive mechanism to alleviate the burden of organ wastage in transplantation. Management Sci. 68(8):5980–6002.Google Scholar
• Vulchev A, Roberts JP, Stock PG (2004) Ethical issues in split versus whole liver transplantation. Amer. J. Transplantation 4(11):1737–1740.Google Scholar
• Whitt W (2006) Fluid models for multiserver queues with abandonments. Oper. Res. 54(1):37–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Zenios SA, Chertow GM, Wein LM (2000) Dynamic allocation of kidneys to candidates on the transplant waiting list. Oper. Res. 48(4):549–569.Link, Google Scholar