Shipping Emission Control Area Optimization Considering Carbon Emission Reduction

References

• Agarwal R, Ergun Ö (2010) Network design and allocation mechanisms for carrier alliances in liner shipping. Oper. Res. 58(6):1726–1742.Link, Google Scholar
• Akyüz MH, Lee CY (2016) Service type assignment and container routing with transit time constraints and empty container repositioning for liner shipping service networks. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 88:46–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Browning L, Hartley S, Bandemehr A, Gathright K, Miller W (2012) Demonstration of fuel switching on oceangoing vessels in the Gulf of Mexico. J. Air Waste Management Assoc. 62(9):1093–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cariou P, Cheaitou A (2012) The effectiveness of a European speed limit vs. an international Bunker-Levy to reduce CO2 emissions from container shipping. Transportation Res. Part D Transport Environ. 17(2):116–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang CC, Jhang CW (2016) Reducing speed and fuel transfer of the green flag incentive program in Kaohsiung port Taiwan. Transportation Res. Part D Transport Environ. 46:1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang YT, Roh Y, Park H (2014) Assessing noxious gases of vessel operations in a potential emission control area. Transportation Res. Part D Transport Environ. 28:91–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Yip TL, Mou J (2018) Provision of emission control area and the impact on shipping route choice and ship emissions. Transportation Res. Part D Transport Environ. 58:280–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corbett JJ, Wang H, Winebrake JJ (2009) The effectiveness and costs of speed reductions on emissions from international shipping. Transportation Res. Part D Transport Environ. 14(8):593–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dai L, Hu H, Wang Z, Shi Y, Ding W (2019) An environmental and techno-economic analysis of shore side electricity. Transportation Res. Part D Transport Environ. 75:223–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong B, Christiansen M, Fagerholt K, Bektaş T (2020) Combined maritime fleet deployment and inventory management with port visit flexibility in roll-on roll-off shipping. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 140:101988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doudnikoff M, Lacoste R (2014) Effect of a speed reduction of containerships in response to higher energy costs in sulphur emission control areas. Transportation Res. Part D Transport Environ. 28:51–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eason C (2015) Aronnax: Are sulphur emission control areas impacting CO2 emissions? Accessed October 20, 2021, https://lloydslist.maritimeintelligence.informa.com/LL020080/Aronnax-Are-sulphur-emission-control-areas-impacting-CO2-emissions.Google Scholar
• Fagerholt K, Psaraftis HN (2015) On two speed optimization problems for ships that sail in and out of emission control areas. Transportation Res. Part D Transport Environ. 39:56–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fagerholt K, Gausel NT, Rakke JG, Psaraftis HN (2015) Maritime routing and speed optimization with emission control areas. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 52:57–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fransoo JC, Lee CY (2013) The critical role of ocean container transport in global supply chain performance. Production Oper. Management 22(2):253–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• GLOBE (2020) Technical and Cost Evaluation for the Management of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions. Globe Metallurgical, Beverly, OH.Google Scholar
• Gu Y, Wallace SW (2017) Scrubber: A potentially overestimated compliance method for the emission control areas: The importance of involving a ship’s sailing pattern in the evaluation. Transportation Res. Part D Transport Environ. 55:51–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• ICS (2021) Shipping industry sets out bold plan to global regulator to deliver net zero by 2050. Accessed October 20, 2021, https://www.ics-shipping.org/press-release/shipping-industry-sets-out-bold-plan-to-global-regulator-to-deliver-net-zero-by-2050/.Google Scholar
• IMO (2020) Fourth IMO GHG Study 2020—Final Report. International Maritime Organization, London.Google Scholar
• Karsten CV, Ropke S, Pisinger D (2018) Simultaneous optimization of container ship sailing speed and container routing with transit time restrictions. Transportation Sci. 52(4):769–787.Link, Google Scholar
• Khan MY, Agrawal H, Ranganathan S, Welch WA, Miller JW, Cocker DR III (2012) Greenhouse gas and criteria emission benefits through reduction of vessel speed at sea. Environ. Sci. Tech. 46(22):12600–12607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee CY, Shu S, Xu Z (2021) Optimal global liner service procurement by utilizing liner service schedules. Production Oper. Management 30(3):703–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li L, Gao S, Yang W, Xiong X (2020) Ship’s response strategy to emission control areas: From the perspective of sailing pattern optimization and evasion strategy selection. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 133:101835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• López-Aparicio S, Tønnesen D, Thanh TN, Neilson H (2017) Shipping emissions in a Nordic port: Assessment of mitigation strategies. Transportation Res. Part D Transport Environ. 53:205–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu T, Fransoo JC, Lee CY (2017) Carrier portfolio management for shipping seasonal products. Oper. Res. 65(5):1250–1266.Link, Google Scholar
• Lübbecke E, Lübbecke ME, Möhring RH (2019) Ship traffic optimization for the Kiel Canal. Oper. Res. 67(3):791–812.Link, Google Scholar
• Ma D, Ma W, Jin S, Ma X (2020) Method for simultaneously optimizing ship route and speed with emission control areas. Ocean Engrg. 202:107170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng MW, Lin DY (2018) Fleet deployment in liner shipping with incomplete demand information. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 116:184–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qi X, Song DP (2012) Minimizing fuel emissions by optimizing vessel schedules in liner shipping with uncertain port times. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 48(4):863–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qi J, Wang S, Psaraftis H (2021) Bi-level optimization model applications in managing air emissions from ships: A review. Comm. Transportation Res. 1:100020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rennert K, Errickson F, Prest BC, Rennels L, Newell RG, Pizer W, Kingdon C, et al. (2022) Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2. Nature 610(7933):687–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheng D, Meng Q, Li ZC (2019) Optimal vessel speed and fleet size for industrial shipping services under the emission control area regulation. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 105:37–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ship and Bunker (2023) World bunker prices. Accessed December 26, 2023, https://shipandbunker.com/prices.Google Scholar
• Sofiev M, Winebrake JJ, Johansson L, Carr EW, Prank M, Soares J, Vira J, Kouznetsov R, Jalkanen JP, Corbett JJ (2018) Cleaner fuels for ships provide public health benefits with climate tradeoffs. Nat. Comm. 9(1):406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song DP, Xu J (2012) An operational activity-based method to estimate CO2 emissions from container shipping considering empty container repositioning. Transportation Res. Part D Transport Environ. 17(1):91–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Svindland M (2018) The environmental effects of emission control area regulations on short sea shipping in Northern Europe: The case of container feeder vessels. Transportation Res. Part D Transport Environ. 61:423–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang S, Meng Q (2012) Sailing speed optimization for container ships in a liner shipping network. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 48(3):701–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang S, Zhuge D, Zhen L, Lee CY (2021) Liner shipping service planning under sulfur emission regulations. Transportation Sci. 55(2):491–509.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang K, Yan X, Yuan Y, Jiang X, Lin X, Negenborn RR (2018) Dynamic optimization of ship energy efficiency considering time-varying environmental factors. Transportation Res. Part D Transport Environ. 62:685–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xia J, Li KX, Ma H, Xu Z (2015) Joint planning of fleet deployment, speed optimization, and cargo allocation for liner shipping. Transportation Sci. 49(4):922–938.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Zheng Z, Wan Z, Zheng S (2020) Does emission control area policy reduce sulfur dioxides concentration in Shanghai? Transportation Res. Part D Transport Environ. 81:102289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhen L, Hu Z, Yan R, Zhuge D, Wang S (2020) Route and speed optimization for liner ships under emission control policies. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 110:330–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhen L, Li M, Hu Z, Lv W, Zhao X (2018) The effects of emission control area regulations on cruise shipping. Transportation Res. Part D Transport Environ. 62:47–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu M, Li KX, Lin KC, Shi W, Yang J (2020) How can shipowners comply with the 2020 global sulphur limit economically? Transportation Res. Part D Transport Environ. 79:102234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zis T, Angeloudis P, Bell MGH (2015) Economic and environmental trade-offs in water transportation. Fahimnia B, Bell MGH, Hensher DA, Sarkis J, eds. Green Logistics and Transportation (Springer, Berlin), 159–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zis T, North RJ, Angeloudis P, Ochieng WY, Bell MGH (2014) Evaluation of cold ironing and speed reduction policies to reduce ship emissions near and at ports. Maritime Econom. Logist. 16(4):371–398.Crossref, Google Scholar