Inverse Optimization: Theory and Applications

References

• Abbeel P, Ng AY (2004) Apprenticeship learning via inverse reinforcement learning. Proc. Internat. Conf. Machine Learning (ACM, New York).Google Scholar
• Afşar S, Brotcorne L, Marcotte P, Savard G (2021) Revenue optimization in energy networks involving self-scheduled demand and a smart grid. Comput. Oper. Res. 134:105366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Ergun Ö (2008) Mechanism design for a multicommodity flow game in service network alliances. Oper. Res. Lett. 36(5):520–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Ergun Ö (2010) Network design and allocation mechanisms for carrier alliances in liner shipping. Oper. Res. 58(6):1726–1742.Link, Google Scholar
• Aghassi M, Bertsimas D, Perakis G (2006) Solving asymmetric variational inequalities via convex optimization. Oper. Res. Lett. 34(5):481–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahmadi F, Ganjkhanloo F, Ghobadi K (2020) Inverse learning: A data-driven framework to infer optimizations models. Preprint, submitted November 5, https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.03038v1.Google Scholar
• Ahmed S, Guan Y (2005) The inverse optimal value problem. Math. Programming 102(1):91–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja RK, Orlin JB (2001) Inverse optimization. Oper. Res. 49(5):771–783.Link, Google Scholar
• Ajayi T, Lee T, Schaefer AJ (2022) Objective selection for cancer treatment: An inverse optimization approach. Oper. Res. 70(3):1717–1738.Link, Google Scholar
• Alagoz O, Maillart LM, Schaefer AJ, Roberts MS (2004) The optimal timing of living-donor liver transplantation. Management Sci. 50(10):1420–1430.Link, Google Scholar
• Alagoz O, Maillart LM, Schaefer AJ, Roberts MS (2007a) Choosing among living-donor and cadaveric livers. Management Sci. 53(11):1702–1715.Link, Google Scholar
• Alagoz O, Maillart LM, Schaefer AJ, Roberts MS (2007b) Determining the acceptance of cadaveric livers using an implicit model of the waiting list. Oper. Res. 55(1):24–36.Link, Google Scholar
• Allen S, Gabriel SA, Dickerson JP (2022) Using inverse optimization to learn cost functions in generalized Nash games. Comput. Oper. Res. 142:105721.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alsabah H, Capponi A, Lacedelli OR, Stern M (2021) Robo-advising: Learning investors’ risk preferences via portfolio choices. J. Financial Econom. 19(2):369–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora S, Doshi P (2021) A survey of inverse reinforcement learning: Challenges, methods and progress. Artificial Intelligence 297:103500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora S, Hazan E, Kale S (2012) The multiplicative weights update method: A meta-algorithm and applications. Theory Comput. 8(1):121–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aswani A, Shen Z-JM, Siddiq A (2018) Inverse optimization with noisy data. Oper. Res. 66(3):870–892.Link, Google Scholar
• Aswani A, Shen Z-JM, Siddiq A (2019) Data-driven incentive design in the Medicare shared savings program. Oper. Res. 67(4):1002–1026.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Ayer T (2015) Inverse optimization for assessing emerging technologies in breast cancer screening. Ann. Oper. Res. 230(1):57–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babier A, Boutilier JJ, McNiven AL, Chan TCY (2018) Knowledge-based automated planning for oropharyngeal cancer. Medical Phys. 45(7):2875–2883.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babier A, Chan TCY, Lee T, Mahmood R, Terekhov D (2021) An ensemble learning framework for model fitting and evaluation in inverse linear optimization. INFORMS J. Optim. 3(2):119–138.Link, Google Scholar
• Babier A, Mahmood R, McNiven AL, Diamant A, Chan TCY (2020a) The importance of evaluating the complete automated knowledge-based planning pipeline. Phys. Medica 72:73–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babier A, Mahmood R, McNiven AL, Diamant A, Chan TCY (2020b) Knowledge-based automated planning with three-dimensional generative adversarial networks. Medical Phys. 47(2):297–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bärmann A, Martin A, Pokutta S, Schneider O (2018) An online-learning approach to inverse optimization. Preprint, submitted October 30, https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.12997.Google Scholar
• Bartlett PL, Mendelson S (2002) Rademacher and gaussian complexities: Risk bounds and structural results. J. Machine Learning Res. 3:463–482.Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Gupta V, Paschalidis IC (2015) Data-driven estimation in equilibrium using inverse optimization. Math. Programming 153(2):595–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bianco L, Caramia M, Giordani S, Piccialli V (2016) A game-theoretic approach for regulating hazmat transportation. Transportation Sci. 50(2):424–438.Link, Google Scholar
• Birge JR, Hortaçsu A, Pavlin JM (2017) Inverse optimization for the recovery of market structure from market outcomes: An application to the miso electricity market. Oper. Res. 65(4):837–855.Link, Google Scholar
• Birge J, Li X, Sun C (2022) Learning from stochastically revealed preference. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 35:35061–35071.Google Scholar
• Bodur M, Chan TCY, Zhu IY (2022) Inverse mixed integer optimization: Polyhedral insights and trust region methods. INFORMS J. Comput. 34(3):1471–1488.Link, Google Scholar
• Bottou L, Curtis EC, Nocedal J (2018) Optimization methods for large-scale machine learning. SIAM Rev. 60(2):223–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boutilier JJ, Lee T, Craig T, Sharpe MB, Chan TC (2015) Models for predicting objective function weights in prostate cancer IMRT. Medical Phys. 42(4):1586–1595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brotcorne L, Cirinei F, Marcotte P, Savard G (2011) An exact algorithm for the network pricing problem. Discrete Optim. 8(2):246–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brotcorne L, Labbé M, Marcotte P, Savard G (2008) Joint design and pricing on a network. Oper. Res. 56(5):1104–1115.Link, Google Scholar
• Burton D, Toint PhL (1992) On an instance of the inverse shortest paths problem. Math. Programming 53(1–3):45–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton D, Toint PhL (1994) On the use of an inverse shortest paths algorithm for recovering linearly correlated costs. Math. Programming 63(1–3):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai M-C, Duin CW, Yang X, Zhang J (2008) The partial inverse minimum spanning tree problem when weight increase is forbidden. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 188(2):348–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Černỳ M, Hladík M (2016) Inverse optimization: Toward the optimal parameter set of inverse LP with interval coefficients. Central Eur. J. Oper. Res. 24(3):747–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TCY, Kaw N (2020) Inverse optimization for the recovery of constraint parameters. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 282(2):415–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TCY, Lee T (2018) Trade-off preservation in inverse multiobjective convex optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 270(1):25–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TCY, Lee T, Terekhov D (2018) Inverse optimization: Closed-form solutions, geometry, and goodness of fit. Management Sci. 65(3):1115–1135.Link, Google Scholar
• Chan TCY, Craig T, Lee T, Sharpe MB (2014) Generalized inverse multiobjective optimization with application to cancer therapy. Oper. Res. 62(3):680–695.Link, Google Scholar
• Chan TCY, Eberg M, Forster K, Holloway C, Ieraci L, Shalaby Y, Yousefi N (2022a) An inverse optimization approach to measuring clinical pathway concordance. Management Sci. 68(3):1882–1903.Link, Google Scholar
• Chan TCY, Forster K, Habbous S, Holloway C, Ieraci L, Shalaby Y, Yousefi N (2022b) Inverse optimization on hierarchical networks: An application to breast cancer clinical pathways. Health Care Management Sci. 25(4):590–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen VX, Kilinç-Karzan F (2020) Online convex optimization perspective for learning from dynamically revealed preferences. Preprint, submitted August 20, https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.10460.Google Scholar
• Chen L, Chen Y, Langevin A (2021) An inverse optimization approach for a capacitated vehicle routing problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 295(3):1087–1098.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chow JYJ, Djavadian S (2015) Activity-based market equilibrium for capacitated multimodal transport systems. Transportation Res. Part C Emerging Tech. 7:2–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chow JYJ, Recker WW (2012) Inverse optimization with endogenous arrival time constraints to calibrate the household activity pattern problem. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 46(3):463–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colson B, Marcotte P, Savard G (2007) An overview of bilevel optimization. Ann. Oper. Res. 153(1):235–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawande M, Keskinocak P, Swaminathan JM, Tayur S (2001) On bipartite and multipartite clique problems. J. Algorithms 41(2):388–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong C, Zeng B (2021) Wasserstein distributionally robust inverse multiobjective optimization. Proc. AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35 (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 5914–5921.Google Scholar
• Dong C, Chen Y, Zeng B (2018) Generalized inverse optimization through online learning. NIPS’18: Proc. 32nd Internat. Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (ACM, New York), 86–95.Google Scholar
• Duan Z, Wang L (2011) Heuristic algorithms for the inverse mixed integer linear programming problem. J. Global Optim. 51(3):463–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elmachtoub AN, Grigas P (2022) Smart “predict, then optimize.” Management Sci. 68(1):9–26.Link, Google Scholar
• Erkin Z, Bailey MD, Maillart LM, Schaefer AJ, Roberts MS (2010) Eliciting patients’ revealed preferences: An inverse Markov decision process approach. Decision Anal. 7(4):358–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Esfahani PM, Kuhn D (2018) Data-driven distributionally robust optimization using the Wasserstein metric: Performance guarantees and tractable reformulations. Math. Programming 171(1):115–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Esfahani PM, Shafieezadeh-Abadeh S, Hanasusanto GA, Kuhn D (2018) Data-driven inverse optimization with imperfect information. Math. Programming 167(1):191–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Esfandeh T, Kwon C, Batta R (2016) Regulating hazardous materials transportation by dual toll pricing. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological 83:20–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernández-Blanco R, Morales JM, Pineda S (2021a) Forecasting the price-response of a pool of buildings via homothetic inverse optimization. Appl. Energy 290:116791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernández-Blanco R, Morales JM, Pineda S, Porras Á (2021b) Inverse optimization with kernel regression: Application to the power forecasting and bidding of a fleet of electric vehicles. Comput. Oper. Res. 134:105405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frenk JBG, Schaible S (2005) Fractional programming. Hadjisavvas N, Komlósi S, Schaible S, eds. Handbook of Generalized Convexity and Generalized Monotonicity (Springer, New York), 335–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghate A (2015) Inverse optimization in countably infinite linear programs. Oper. Res. Lett. 43(3):231–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghate A (2020a) Imputing radiobiological parameters of the linear-quadratic dose-response model from a radiotherapy fractionation plan. Phys. Medicine Biol. 65(22):225009.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghate A (2020b) Inverse optimization in semi-infinite linear programs. Oper. Res. Lett. 48(3):278–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghatrani Z, Ghate A (2022) Inverse Markov decision processes with unknown transition probabilities. IISE Trans. 55(6):1–14.Google Scholar
• Ghobadi K, Mahmoudzadeh H (2021) Inferring linear feasible regions using inverse optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 290(3):829–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girosi H, Jones M, Poggio T (1993) Priors stabilizers and basis functions: From regularization to radial, tensor and additive splines. Technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Goli A, Boutilier JJ, Craig T, Sharpe MB, Chan TCY (2018) A small number of objective function weight vectors is sufficient for automated treatment planning in prostate cancer. Phys. Medicine Biol. 63(19):195004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith RE, Stewart RA (1961) A nonlinear programming technique for the optimization of continuous processing systems. Management Sci. 7(4):379–392.Link, Google Scholar
• Güler Ç, Hamacher HW (2010) Capacity inverse minimum cost flow problem. J. Combin. Optim. 19(1):43–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta R, Zhang Q (2022) Decomposition and adaptive sampling for data-driven inverse linear optimization. INFORMS J. Comput. 34(5):2720–2735.Link, Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heuberger C (2004) Inverse combinatorial optimization: A survey on problems, methods, and results. J. Combin. Optim. 8(3):329–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho-Nguyen N, Kilinç-Karzan F (2022) Risk guarantees for end-to-end prediction and optimization processes. Management Sci. 68(12):8680–8698.Link, Google Scholar
• Houghtalen L, Ergun Ö, Sokol J (2011) Designing mechanisms for the management of carrier alliances. Transportation Sci. 45(4):465–482.Link, Google Scholar
• Hu J, Mitchell JE, Pang J-S, Yu B (2012) On linear programs with linear complementarity constraints. J. Global Optim. 53(1):29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Igami M (2020) Artificial intelligence as structural estimation: Deep blue, bonanza, and AlphaGo. Econom. J. 23(3):S1–S24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar G, Kang W (2005) Inverse conic programming with applications. Oper. Res. Lett. 33(3):319–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaipio J, Somersalo E (2006) Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems, vol. 160 (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
• Kang JE, Recker W (2013) The location selection problem for the household activity pattern problem. Transportation Res. Part B Methodological. 55:75–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keshavarz A, Wang Y, Boyd S (2011) Imputing a convex objective function. Proc. IEEE Internat. Sympos. Intelligent Control (ISIC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 613–619.Google Scholar
• Kleinert T, Labbé M, Ljubić I, Schmidt M (2021) A survey on mixed-integer programming techniques in bilevel optimization. Eur. J. Comput. Optim. 9:100007.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koenker R, Hallock JF (2001) Quantile regression. J. Econom. Perspect. 15(4):143–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamperski JB, Schaefer AJ (2015) A polyhedral characterization of the inverse-feasible region of a mixed-integer program. Oper. Res. Lett. 43(6):575–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lasserre J-B (2009) Linear and Integer Programming vs Linear Integration and Counting: A Duality Viewpoint (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee T, Hammad M, Chan TC, Craig T, Sharpe MB (2013) Predicting objective function weights from patient anatomy in prostate IMRT treatment planning. Medical Phys. 40(12):121706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li JY-M (2021) Inverse optimization of convex risk functions. Management Sci. 67(11):7113–7141.Link, Google Scholar
• Li X, Zhang Z, Du D-Z (2018) Partial inverse maximum spanning tree in which weight can only be decreased under lp-norm. J. Global Optim. 70(3):677–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu S, Siddiq A, Zhang J (2022) Planning bike lanes with data: Ridership, congestion, and path selection. Preprint, submitted March 12, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4055703.Google Scholar
• Low H, Meghir C (2017) The use of structural models in econometrics. J. Econom. Perspect. 31(2):33–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu T, Wang Z, Wang J, Ai Q, Wang C (2018) A data-driven Stackelberg market strategy for demand response-enabled distribution systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 10(3):2345–2357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lucas WF (1971) Some recent developments in n-person game theory. SIAM Rev. 13(4):491–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcotte P, Mercier A, Savard G, Verter V (2009) Toll policies for mitigating hazardous materials transport risk. Transportation Sci. 43(2):228–243.Link, Google Scholar
• Mostafaee A, Hladík M, Černỳ M (2016) Inverse linear programming with interval coefficients. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 292:591–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng AY, Russell SJ (2000) Algorithms for inverse reinforcement learning. Proc. Internat. Conf. Machine Learning (ACM, New York), 663–670.Google Scholar
• Nourollahi S, Ghate A (2019) Inverse optimization in minimum cost flow problems on countably infinite networks. Networks 73(3):292–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orth JD, Thiele I, Palsson BØ (2010) What is flux balance analysis? Nat. Biotechnol. 28(3):245–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patriksson M (2015) The Traffic Assignment Problem: Models and Methods (Dover Publications, Mineola, NY).Google Scholar
• Puterman ML (1990) Markov decision processes. Handbook Oper. Res. Management Sci. 2:331–434.Google Scholar
• Rathore H, Jakhar SK (2021) Differential carbon tax policy in aviation: One stone that kills two birds? J. Cleaner Production 296:126479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ratliff LJ, Jin M, Konstantakopoulos IC, Spanos C, Sastry SS (2014) Social game for building energy efficiency: Incentive design. Proc. 52nd Annual Allerton Conf. Comm. Control Comput. (Allerton) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1011–1018.Google Scholar
• Risanger S, Fleten S-E, Gabriel SA (2020) Inverse equilibrium analysis of oligopolistic electricity markets. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 35(6):4159–4166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2002) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J. Banking Finance, 26(7):1443–1471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rönnqvist M, Svenson G, Flisberg P, Jönsson L-E (2017) Calibrated route finder: Improving the safety, environmental consciousness, and cost effectiveness of truck routing in sweden. Interfaces 47(5):372–395.Link, Google Scholar
• Russell S (1998) Learning agents for uncertain environments. Proc. Conf. Comput. Learning Theory (Association for Computation Learning, Mountain View, CA), 101–103.Google Scholar
• Ruszczyński A, Shapiro A (2006) Optimization of convex risk functions. Math. Oper. Res. 31(3):433–452.Link, Google Scholar
• Sadana U, Chenreddy A, Delage E, Forel A, Frejinger E, Vidal T (2023) A survey of contextual optimization methods for decision making under uncertainty. Preprint, submitted June 17, https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.10374.Google Scholar
• Saez-Gallego J, Morales JM (2017) Short-term forecasting of price-responsive loads using inverse optimization. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 9(5):4805–4814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saez-Gallego J, Morales JM, Zugno M, Madsen H (2016) A data-driven bidding model for a cluster of price-responsive consumers of electricity. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 31(6):5001–5011.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sayre GA, Ruan D (2014) Automatic treatment planning with convex imputing. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 489:012058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaefer AJ (2009) Inverse integer programming. Optim. Lett. 3(4):483–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scholkopf B, Smola AJ (2001) Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shahmoradi Z, Lee T (2021) Quantile inverse optimization: Improving stability in inverse linear programming. Oper. Res. 70(4):2538–2562.Link, Google Scholar
• Su C-L, Judd KL (2012) Constrained optimization approaches to estimation of structural models. Econometrica 80(5):2213–2230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton RS, Barto AG (2018) Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Tarantola A (2005) Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation (SIAM, Philadelphia).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tayyebi J, Sepasian AR (2020) Partial inverse min–max spanning tree problem. J. Combin. Optim. 40(4):1075–1091.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Troutt MD, Pang W-K, Hou S-H (2006) Behavioral estimation of mathematical programming objective function coefficients. Management Sci. 53(3):422–434.Link, Google Scholar
• Troutt MD, Brandyberry AA, Sohn C, Tadisina SK (2008) Linear programming system identification: The general nonnegative parameters case. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 185:63–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Troutt MD, Tadisina SK, Sohn C, Brandyberry AA (2005) Linear programming system identification. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 161(3):663–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner SDO, Chan TCY (2013) Examining the LEED rating system using inverse optimization. J. Solar Energy Engrg. 135(4):040901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Utz S, Wimmer M, Hirschberger M, Steuer E (2014) Tri-criterion inverse portfolio optimization with application to socially responsible mutual funds. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 234(2):491–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang L (2009) Cutting plane algorithms for the inverse mixed integer linear programming problem. Oper. Res. Lett. 37(2):114–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang L (2013) Branch-and-bound algorithms for the partial inverse mixed integer linear programming problem. J. Global Optim. 55(3):491–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wei K, Vaze V (2018) Modeling crew itineraries and delays in the national air transportation system. Transportation Sci. 52(5):1276–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang X, Zhang J (2007) Partial inverse assignment problems under l1 norm. Oper. Res. Lett. 35(1):23–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• You SI, Chow JYJ, Ritchie SG (2016) Inverse vehicle routing for activity-based urban freight forecast modeling and city logistics. Transportmetrica A Transportation Sci. 12(7):650–673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu S, Wang H, Dong C (2023) Learning risk preferences from investment portfolios using inverse optimization. Res. Internat. Bus. Finance. 64:101879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Paschalidis IC (2017) Data-driven estimation of travel latency cost functions via inverse optimization in multi-class transportation networks. Proc. IEEE 56th Annual Conf. Decision Control (CDC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 6295–6300.Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Xu C (2010) Inverse optimization for linearly constrained convex separable programming problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 200(3):671–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Zhang L (2010) An augmented Lagrangian method for a class of inverse quadratic programming problems. Appl. Math. Optim. 61(1):57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu Z, Ma Z (1996) On the inverse problem of minimum spanning tree with partition constraints. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 44(2):171–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Pourazarm S, Cassandras CG, Paschalidis ICh (2016a) The price of anarchy in transportation networks by estimating user cost functions from actual traffic data. Proc. IEEE 55th Annual Conf. Decision Control (CDC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 789–794.Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Pourazarm S, Cassandras CG, Paschalidis ICh (2018) The price of anarchy in transportation networks: Data-driven evaluation and reduction strategies. Proc. IEEE 106(4):538–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Li S, Lai H-J, Du D-Z (2016b) Algorithms for the partial inverse matroid problem in which weights can only be increased. J. Global Optim. 65(4):801–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Wang K, Jacquillat A, Wang S (2023) Optimized scenario reduction: Solving large-scale stochastic programs with quality guarantees. INFORMS J. Comput. 35(4):886–908.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhao Q, Stettner AI, Reznik E, Paschalidis Ich, Segrè D (2016) Mapping the landscape of metabolic goals of a cell. Genome Biol. 17(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao Q, Stettner AI, Reznik E, Segrè D, Paschalidis Ich (2015) Learning cellular objectives from fluxes by inverse optimization. Proc. 54th IEEE Conf. Decision Control (CDC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1271–1276.Google Scholar
• Zheng J, Sun Z, Gao Z (2015a) Empty container exchange among liner carriers. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 83:158–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng J, Gao Z, Yang D, Sun Z (2015b) Network design and capacity exchange for liner alliances with fixed and variable container demands. Transportation Sci. 49(4):886–899.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Wang L, McCalley JD (2011) Designing effective and efficient incentive policies for renewable energy in generation expansion planning. Appl. Energy 88(6):2201–2209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zinkevich M (2003) Online convex programming and generalized infinitesimal gradient ascent. Proc. Internat. Conf. Machine Learning (ACM, New York), 928–936.Google Scholar