Procurement for Assembly Systems Under Supply Uncertainty: Optimal Mechanisms

References

• Bolandifar E, Feng T, Zhang F (2018) Simple contracts to assure supply under noncontractible capacity and asymmetric cost information. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(2):217–231.Link, Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi A, Martínez-de Albéniz V (2011) Optimal procurement design in the presence of supply risk. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(2):227–243.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis AM, Hu B, Hyndman K, Qi A (2022) Procurement for assembly under asymmetric information: Theory and evidence. Management Sci. 68(4):2694–2713.Link, Google Scholar
• Dong L, Geng X, Xiao G, Yang N (2022) Procurement strategies with unreliable suppliers under correlated random yields. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(1):179–195.Link, Google Scholar
• Elmer-DeWitt P (2014) Apple and GTAT: What went wrong—Update. Fortune Online (October 29), https://fortune.com/2014/10/29/apple-and-gtat-what-went-wrong.Google Scholar
• Fang X, Ru J, Wang Y (2014) Optimal procurement design of an assembly supply chain with information asymmetry. Production Oper. Management 23(12):2075–2088.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farahani MH, Dawande M, Gurnani H, Janakiraman G (2021) Better to bend than to break: Sharing supply risk using the supply-flexibility contract. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(5):1257–1274.Link, Google Scholar
• Federgruen A, Yang N (2011) Procurement strategies with unreliable suppliers. Oper. Res. 59(4):1033–1039.Link, Google Scholar
• Gümüş M, Ray S, Gurnani H (2012) Supply-side story: Risks, guarantees, competition, and information asymmetry. Management Sci. 58(9):1694–1714.Link, Google Scholar
• Guo L (2023) The mnemonomics of contractual screening. Management Sci. 69(3):1739–1757.Link, Google Scholar
• Hu B, Qi A (2018) Optimal procurement mechanisms for assembly. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):655–666.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang L (2015) Managing supplier competition and sourcing sequence for component manufacturing. Production Oper. Management 24(2):287–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang L, Wang Y (2010) Supplier competition in decentralized assembly systems with price-sensitive and uncertain demand. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(1):93–101.Link, Google Scholar
• Kalkancı B, Erhun F (2012) Pricing games and impact of private demand information in decentralized assembly systems. Oper. Res. 60(5):1142–1156.Link, Google Scholar
• Kelly G (2023) Apple brings in Samsung to solve iPhone 15 production problem. Forbes Online (March 27), https://www.forbes.com/sites/gordonkelly/2023/03/27/apple-iphone-15-pro-max-oled-display-problem-no-promotion.Google Scholar
• King I, Wu D (2021) Chip crisis in “danger zone” as wait times reach new record. Bloomberg Online (May 18), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-05-18/wait-for-chip-deliveries-increased-in-sign-shortage-persists.Google Scholar
• Laffont JJ, Martimort D (2002) The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Zhang H, Fine CH (2013) Dynamic business share allocation in a supply chain with competing suppliers. Oper. Res. 61(2):280–297.Link, Google Scholar
• Lovejoy WS (2010) Conversations with supply chain managers. Ross School of Business Paper No. 1145, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
• Myerson RB (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Myerson RB (1982) Optimal coordination mechanisms in generalized principal–agent problems. J. Math. Econom. 10(1):67–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pan W, So KC (2016) Component procurement strategies in decentralized assembly systems under supply uncertainty. IIE Trans. 48(3):267–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simchi-Levi D, Schmidt W, Wei Y (2014) From superstorms to factory fires: Managing unpredictable supply chain disruptions. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(1–2):96–101.Google Scholar
• Tang SY, Kouvelis P (2011) Supplier diversification strategies in the presence of yield uncertainty and buyer competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(4):439–451.Link, Google Scholar
• Tomlin B (2006) On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Sci. 52(5):639–657.Link, Google Scholar
• Topkis DM (1998) Supermodularity and Complementarity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Babich V (2015) Does a procurement service provider generate value for the buyer through information about supply risks? Management Sci. 61(5):979–998.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Aydin G, Babich V, Beil DR (2009) Supply disruptions, asymmetric information, and a backup production option. Management Sci. 55(2):192–209.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Aydin G, Babich V, Beil DR (2012) Using a dual-sourcing option in the presence of asymmetric information about supplier reliability: Competition vs. diversification. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):202–217.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang F (2010) Procurement mechanism design in a two-echelon inventory system with price-sensitive demand. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(4):608–626.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Kong G, Rajagopalan S (2018) Contract design by service providers with private effort. Management Sci. 64(6):2672–2689.Link, Google Scholar