Dynamic Double Auctions: Toward First Best

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2266

References

  • Ashlagi I, Daskalakis C, Haghpanah N (2016) Sequential mechanisms with ex-post participation guarantees. Proc. 2016 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. Maastricht, Netherlands, 213–214.Google Scholar
  • Athey S, Segal I (2013) An efficient dynamic mechanism. Econometrica 81(6):2463–2485.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azevedo EM, Budish E (2019) Strategy-proofness in the large. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(1):81–116.Google Scholar
  • Babaioff M, Cai Y, Gonczarowski YA, Zhao M (2018) The best of both worlds: Asymptotically efficient mechanisms with a guarantee on the expected gains-from-trade. Proc. 2018 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM), 373–373.Google Scholar
  • Balseiro S, Gurkan H, Sun P (2019) Multi-agent mechanism design without money. Oper. Res. 67(5):1417–1436.Google Scholar
  • Balseiro SR, Mirrokni VS, Paes Leme R (2017b) Dynamic mechanisms with martingale utilities. Management Sci. 64(11):5062–5082.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Balseiro SR, Mirrokni V, Paes Leme R, Zuo S (2019) Dynamic double auctions: Toward first best. Proc. 30th Annual ACM-SIAM Symp. Discrete Algorithms, 157–172.Google Scholar
  • Balseiro S, Lin M, Mirrokni V, Paes Leme R, Zuo S (2017c) Dynamic revenue sharing. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 30: Annual Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 2017, 2678–2686.Google Scholar
  • Bergemann D, Välimäki J (2010) The dynamic pivot mechanism. Econometrica 78(2):771–789.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blumrosen L, Dobzinski S (2014) Reallocation mechanisms. Proc. 15th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM), 617–617.Google Scholar
  • Blumrosen L, Dobzinski S (2021) (Almost) efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. Games Econom. Behav. 130:369–383.Google Scholar
  • Blumrosen L, Mizrahi Y (2016) Approximating gains-from-trade in bilateral trading. Internat. Conf. Web and Internet Econom. (Springer), 400–413.Google Scholar
  • Board S, Skrzypacz A (2016) Revenue management with forward-looking buyers. J. Political Econom. 124(4):1046–1087.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brustle J, Cai Y, Wu F, Zhao M (2017) Approximating gains from trade in two-sided markets via simple mechanisms. Proc. 2017 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput., 589–590.Google Scholar
  • Colini-Baldeschi R, Keijzer Bd, Leonardi S, Turchetta S (2016) Approximately efficient double auctions with strong budget balance. Proc. 27th Annual ACM-SIAM Symp. Discrete Algorithms (SIAM), 1424–1443.Google Scholar
  • Colini-Baldeschi R, Goldberg PW, de Keijzer B, Leonardi S, Turchetta S (2017) Fixed price approximability of the optimal gain from trade. Internat. Conf. Web Internet Econom. (Springer), 146–160.Google Scholar
  • Colini-Baldeschi R, Goldberg PW, de Keijzer B, Leonardi S, Roughgarden T, Turchetta S (2020) Approximately efficient two-sided combinatorial auctions. Proc. 2017 ACM Conf. Trans. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 8(1):1–29.Google Scholar
  • Gallien J (2006) Dynamic mechanism design for online commerce. Oper. Res. 54(2):291–310.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gershkov A, Moldovanu B (2014) Dynamic Allocation and Pricing: A Mechanism Design Approach (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Gerstgrasser M, Goldberg PW, Koutsoupias E (2016) Revenue maximization for market intermediation with correlated priors. Internat. Symp. Algorithmic Game Theory (Springer), 273–285.Google Scholar
  • Gomes R, Mirrokni V (2014) Optimal revenue-sharing double auctions with applications to ad exchanges. 23rd Internat. World Wide Web Conf., 19–28.Google Scholar
  • Gorokh A, Banerjee S, Iyer K (2017) From monetary to non-monetary mechanism design via artificial currencies. Proc. 2017 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM), 563–564.Google Scholar
  • Green EJ (1987) Lending and the smoothing of uninsurable income. Contractual Arrangements for Intertemporal Trade 1:3–25.Google Scholar
  • Guo Y, Hörner J (2015) Dynamic mechanisms without money. Technical report, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.Google Scholar
  • He X, Pan J, Jin O, Xu T, Liu B, Xu T, Shi Y, et al. (2014) Practical lessons from predicting clicks on ads at Facebook. Proc. 8th Internat. Workshop Data Mining Online Advertising, 1–9.Google Scholar
  • Jackson MO, Sonnenschein HF (2007) Overcoming incentive constraints by linking decisions 1. Econometrica 75(1):241–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kakade S, Lobel I, Nazerzadeh H (2013) Optimal dynamic mechanism design and the virtual pivot mechanism. Oper. Res. 61(3):837–854.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krähmer D, Strausz R (2015) Optimal sales contracts with withdrawal rights. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(2):762–790.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishna RV, Lopomo G, Taylor CR (2013) Stairway to heaven or highway to hell: Liquidity, sweat equity, and the uncertain path to ownership. RAND J. Econom. 44(1):104–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazos P, Goldberg P, Skopalik A, Gerstgrasser M, de Keijzer B (2019) Multi-unit bilateral trade. Proc. 33rd AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 33(1):1973–1980.Google Scholar
  • McAfee RP (1992) A dominant strategy double auction. J. Econom. Theory 56(2):434–450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee RP (2008) The gains from trade under fixed price mechanisms. Appl. Econom. Res. Bull. 1(1):1–10.Google Scholar
  • McAfee R, Reny P (1992) Correlated information and mechanism design. Econometrica 60(2):395–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDiarmid C (1998) Concentration. Habib M, McDiarmid C, Ramirez-Alfonsin J, Reed B, eds. Probabilistic Methods for Algorithmic Discrete Mathematics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg), 195–248.Google Scholar
  • McMahan HB, Holt G, Sculley D, Young M, Ebner D, Grady J, Nie L, et al. (2013) Ad click prediction: A view from the trenches. Proc. 19th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining, 1222–1230.Google Scholar
  • Mirrokni V, Paes Leme R, Tang P, Zuo S (2016) Optimal dynamic mechanisms with ex-post IR via bank accounts.Google Scholar
  • Mirrokni V, Paes Leme R, Tang P, Zuo S (2020) Non-clairvoyant dynamic mechanism design. Econometrica 88(5):1939–1963.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myerson RB, Satterthwaite MA (1983) Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. J. Econom. Theory 29(2):265–281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niazadeh R, Yuan Y, Kleinberg R (2014) Simple and near-optimal mechanisms for market intermediation. Web Internet Econom. (WINE), 386–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pavan A, Segal I, Toikka J (2014) Dynamic mechanism design: A Myersonian approach. Econometrica 82(2):601–653.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Segal-Halevi E, Hassidim A, Aumann Y (2016) Sbba: A strongly-budget-balanced double-auction mechanism. Internat. Symp. Algorithmic Game Theory (Springer), 260–272.Google Scholar
  • Segal-Halevi E, Hassidim A, Aumann Y (2018) Double auctions in markets for multiple kinds of goods. Proc. Twenty-Seventh Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-18 (International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization), 489–497.Google Scholar
  • Spear SE, Srivastava S (1987) On repeated moral hazard with discounting. Rev. Econom. Stud. 54(4):599–617.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas J, Worrall T (1990) Income fluctuation and asymmetric information: An example of a repeated principal-agent problem. J. Econom. Theory 51(2):367–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vulcano G, van Ryzin G, Maglaras C (2002) Optimal dynamic auctions for revenue management. Management Sci. 48(11):1388–1407.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.