Spatial Price Integration in Commodity Markets with Capacitated Transportation Networks

References

• Abolhassani M, Bateni MH, Hajiaghayi MT, Mahini H, Sawant A(2014) Network cournot competition. Proc. Internat. Conf. on Web and Internet Econom. (Springer, Berlin), 15–29.Google Scholar
• Adelman MA (1984) International oil agreements. Energy J. 5(3):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Al Kathiri N, Al-Rashed Y, Doshi TK, Murphy FH (2017) “Asian premium” or “North Atlantic discount”: Does geographical diversification in oil trade always impose costs? Energy Econom. 66:411–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avalos R, Fitzgerald T, Rucker RR (2016) Measuring the effects of natural gas pipeline constraints on regional pricing and market integration. Energy Econom. 60:217–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balke NS, Fomby TB (1997) Threshold cointegration. Internat. Econom. Rev. 38(3):627–645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrett CB, Li JR (2002) Distinguishing between equilibrium and integration in spatial price analysis. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 84(2):292–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett M, Yuan Y (2017) On the price spread of benchmark crude oils: A spatial price equilibrium model. Preprint, Submitted January 8, Updated March 7, 2017. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2894389.Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Ehsani S, Ilkiliç R (2019) Cournot competition in networked markets. Management Sci. 65(6):2467–2481.Link, Google Scholar
• Birge JR, Hortaçsu A, Pavlin JM (2017) Inverse optimization for the recovery of market structure from market outcomes: An application to the miso electricity market. Oper. Res. 65(4):837–855.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown SPA, Yücel MK (2008) What drives natural gas prices? Energy J. 29(2):45–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cremer H, Gasmi F, Laffont J-J (2003) Access to pipelines in competitive gas markets. J. Regulatory Econom. 24(1):5–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Vany A, Walls WD (1993) Pipeline access and market integration in the natural gas industry: Evidence from cointegration tests. Energy J. 14:1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dieckhöner C, Lochner S, Lindenberger D (2013) European natural gas infrastructure: The impact of market developments on gas flows and physical market integration. Appl. Energy 102:994–1003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dukhanina E, Massol O (2018) Spatial integration of natural gas markets: A literature review. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Rep. 5(2):129–137.Google Scholar
• EIA (2012) Much of the country’s refinery capacity is concentrated along the gulf coast. Accessed January 30, 2020, https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=7170.Google Scholar
• EIA (2016a) Major gasoline pipeline in southeast disrupted for second time in two months. Accessed January 30, 2020, https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=28632.Google Scholar
• EIA (2016b) Pipeline disruption leads to record gasoline stock changes in southeast, Gulf Coast. Accessed January 30, 2020, https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=28172.Google Scholar
• EIA (2017a) Hurricane Harvey caused U.S. Gulf Coast refinery runs to drop, gasoline prices to rise. Accessed January 30, 2020, https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=32852.Google Scholar
• EIA (2017b) Hurricanes Harvey and Irma lead to higher gasoline prices in Florida. Accessed January 30, 2020, https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=32932.Google Scholar
• EIA (2019) Federal and state motor fuels taxes. Accessed January 30, 2020, https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/marketing/monthly/xls/fueltaxes.xls.Google Scholar
• EIA (2021) Cyberattack halts fuel movement on colonial petroleum pipeline. Accessed May 15, 2021, https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=47917.Google Scholar
• Enke S (1951) Equilibrium among spatially separated markets: Solution by electric analogue. Econometrica. 19(1):40–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabriel SA, Vikas S, Ribar DM (2000) Measuring the influence of Canadian carbon stabilization programs on natural gas exports to the United States via a ‘bottom-up’ intertemporal spatial price equilibrium model. Energy Econom. 22(5):497–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodwin BK, Piggott NE (2001) Spatial market integration in the presence of threshold effects. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 83(2):302–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harker PT (1986) Alternative models of spatial competition. Oper. Res. 34(3):410–425.Link, Google Scholar
• Harker PT, Friesz TL (1985) The use of equilibrium network models in logistics management: With application to the US coal industry. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 19(5):457–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendry DF, Juselius K (2000) Explaining cointegration analysis: Part 1. Energy J. 21(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogan WW (1999) Transmission congestion: The nodal-zonal debate revisited. Unpublished Manuscript, Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government, Center for Business and Government.Google Scholar
• Holmberg P, Lazarczyk E (2015) Comparison of congestion management techniques: Nodal, zonal and discriminatory pricing. Energy J. 36(2):145–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmes MJ, Otero J, Panagiotidis T (2013) On the dynamics of gasoline market integration in the united states: Evidence from a pair-wise approach. Energy Econom. 36:503–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• ICF (2016) East Coast and Gulf Coast transportation fuels markets. Technical report, U.S. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• ICIS (2020) Lng spot prices surge on outages, shipping congestion. Accessed May 15, 2021, https://www.icis.com/energy-connections/2020/12/lng-spot-prices-surge-on-outages-shipping-congestion/.Google Scholar
• Kekatos V, Giannakis GB, Baldick R (2014) Grid topology identification using electricity prices. Proc. PES General Meeting—Conf. and Exposition (IEEE, New York), 1–5.Google Scholar
• Li R, Joyeux R, Ripple RD (2014) International natural gas market integration. Energy J. 35(4):159–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li D, Nagurney A, Yu M (2018) Consumer learning of product quality with time delay: Insights from spatial price equilibrium models with differentiated products. Omega 81:150–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lochner S (2011) Identification of congestion and valuation of transport infrastructures in the European natural gas market. Energy 36(5):2483–2492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marmer V, Shapiro D, MacAvoy P (2007) Bottlenecks in regional markets for natural gas transmission services. Energy Econom. 29(1):37–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martínez-de Albéniz V, Josep MVS (2017) A capacitated commodity trading model with market power. Real Options in Energy and Commodity Markets (World Scientific), 31–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massol O, Banal-Estañol A (2018) Market power and spatial arbitrage between interconnected gas hubs. Energy J. 39(SI2):67–95.Google Scholar
• McNew K, Fackler PL (1997) Testing market equilibrium: Is cointegration informative? J. Agricultural Resource Econom. 22(2):191–207.Google Scholar
• Micola AR, Bunn DW (2007) Two markets and a weak link. Energy Econom. 29(1):79–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mudrageda M, Murphy FH (2008) OR practice—An economic equilibrium model of the market for marine transportation services in petroleum products. Oper. Res. 56(2):278–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Nagurney A, Besik D, Dong J (2019) Tariffs and quotas in world trade: A unified variational inequality framework. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 275(1):347–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagurney A, Li D, Nagurney LS (2014) Spatial price equilibrium with information asymmetry in quality and minimum quality standards. Internat. J. Production Econom. 158:300–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Negassa A, Myers RJ (2007) Estimating policy effects on spatial market efficiency: An extension to the parity bounds model. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 89(2):338–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver ME, Mason CF (2018) Natural gas pipeline regulation in the United States: Past, present, and future. Foundations Trends Microeconom. 11(4):227–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver ME, Mason CF, Finnoff D (2014) Pipeline congestion and basis differentials. J. Regulatory Econom. 46(3):261–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oren SS (1997) Economic inefficiency of passive transmission rights in congested electricity systems with competitive generation. Energy J. 18(1):63–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park H, Mjelde JW, Bessler DA (2007) Time-varying threshold cointegration and the law of one price. Appl. Econom. 39(9):1091–1105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parsley DC, Wei S-J (1996) Convergence to the law of one price without trade barriers or currency fluctuations. Quart. J. Econom. 111(4):1211–1236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paul RJ, Miljkovic D, Ipe V (2001) Market integration in us gasoline markets. Appl. Econom. 33(10):1335–1340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiu Y (1991) Solution properties of oligopolistic network equilibria. Networks 21(5):565–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson PA (1952) Spatial price equilibrium and linear programming. Amer. Econom. Rev. 42(3):283–303.Google Scholar
• Secomandi N (2010) On the pricing of natural gas pipeline capacity. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(3):393–408.Link, Google Scholar
• Siliverstovs B, L’Hégaret G, Neumann A, Von Hirschhausen C (2005) International market integration for natural gas? A cointegration analysis of prices in Europe, North America and Japan. Energy Econom. 27(4):603–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takayama T, Judge GG (1964) Equilibrium among spatially separated markets: A reformulation. Econometrica 32(4):510–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiner RJ (1991) Is the world oil market “one great pool”? Energy J. 12(3):95–108.Crossref, Google Scholar