Star-Shaped Risk Measures

References

• Arrow KJ (1971) Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing (Markham, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Artzner P, Delbaen F, Koch-Medina P (2009) Risk measures and efficient use of capital. Astin Bull. 39(1):101–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J-M, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9(3):203–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aouani Z, Chateauneuf A (2008) Exact capacities and star-shaped distorted probabilities. Math. Social Sci. 56(2):185–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baes M, Koch-Medina P, Munari C (2020) Existence, uniqueness, and stability of optimal payoffs of eligible assets. Math. Finance 30(1):128–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrieu P, El Karoui N (2005) Inf-convolution of risk measures and optimal risk transfer. Finance Stochastics 9(2):269–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénassy-Quéré A, Brunnermeier M, Enderlein H, Farhi E, Fratzscher M, Fuest C, Gourinchas P, et al. (2018) Reconciling risk sharing with market discipline: A constructive approach to Euro area reform. CEPR Policy Insight 91, CEPR (Centre for Economic Policy Research, London). Accessed June 18, 2022, https://www.bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/PolicyInsight_91.pdf.Google Scholar
• Bielecki TR, Cialenco I, Chen T (2015) Dynamic conic finance via backward stochastic difference equations. SIAM J. Financial Math. 6(1):1068–1122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bignozzi V, Burzoni M, Munari C (2020) Risk measures based on benchmark loss distributions. J. Risk Insurance 87(2):437–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castagnoli E, De Donno M, Favero G, Modesti P (2015) Granular and star-shaped price systems. J. Financial Risk Management 4(3):227–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cerreia-Vioglio S, Corrao R, Lanzani G (2020) Robust opinion aggregation and its dynamics. IGIER Working Paper 662, Università Bocconi, Milano.Google Scholar
• Cerreia-Vioglio S, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M (2022) Ambiguity aversion and wealth effects. J. Econom. Theory 199:104898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cerreia-Vioglio S, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Montrucchio L (2011) Risk measures: Rationality and diversification. Math. Finance. 21(4):743–774.Google Scholar
• Chandrasekher M, Frick M, Iijima R, Le Yaouanq Y (2020) Dual-self representations of ambiguity preferences. Econometrica 90(3):1029–1061.Google Scholar
• Delbaen F (2002) Coherent risk measures on general probability spaces. In Advances in Finance and Stochastics (Springer, Berlin), 1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drapeau S, Kupper M (2013) Risk preferences and their robust representation. Math. Oper. Res. 38(1):28–62.Link, Google Scholar
• Drèze J (1990) Essays on Economic Decisions Under Uncertainty (CUP Archive).Google Scholar
• Embrechts P, Liu H, Wang R (2018) Quantile-based risk sharing. Oper. Res. 66(4):936–949.Link, Google Scholar
• Farkas W, Koch-Medina P, Munari C (2014) Beyond cash-additive risk measures: When changing the numéraire fails. Finance Stochastics 18(1):145–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filipović D, Kupper M, Vogelpoth N (2009) Separation and duality in locally L0-convex modules. J. Functional Anal. 256(12):3996–4029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Föllmer H, Schied A (2002) Convex measures of risk and trading constraints. Finance Stochastics 6(4):429–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Föllmer H, Schied A (2016) Stochastic Finance. An Introduction in Discrete Time, 4th ed. (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Föllmer H, Schied A, Weber S (2009) Robust preferences and robust portfolio choice. Ciarlet P, Bensoussan A, Zhang Q, eds. Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Methods in Finance Handbook of Numerical Analysis (North Holland, Amsterdam), 29–88.Google Scholar
• Friedman M, Savage LJ (1948) The utility analysis of choices involving risk. J. Political Econ. 56(4):279–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frittelli M, Rosazza Gianin E (2002) Putting order in risk measures. J. Bank. Finance 26(7):1473–1486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghirardato P, Maccheroni F, Marinacci M (2004) Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude. J. Econom. Theory 118(2):133–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glasserman P, Moallemi CC, Yuan K (2016) Hidden illiquidity with multiple central counterparties. Oper. Res. 64(5):1143–1158.Link, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1989) Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. 18(2):141–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glasserman P, Moallemi CC, Yuan K (2016) Hidden illiquidity with multiple central counterparties. Oper. Res. 64(5):1143–1158.Link, Google Scholar
• Hansen L, Sargent TJ (2001) Robust control and model uncertainty. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(2):60–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jia G, Xia J, Zhao R (2020) Monetary risk measures. Preprint, submitted December 12, https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2012.06751.Google Scholar
• Karni E (2011) A theory of Bayesian decision making with action-dependent subjective probabilities. Econom. Theory 48(1):125–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landsberger M, Meilijson I (1990a) Lotteries, insurance, and star-shaped utility functions. J. Econom. Theory 52:1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landsberger M, Meilijson I (1990b) A tale of two tails: An alternative characterization of comparative risk. J. Risk Uncertainty 3(1):65–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu P, Wang R, Wei L (2020) Is the inf-convolution of law-invariant preferences law-invariant? Insurance Math. Econom. 91(C):144–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Rustichini A (2006) Ambiguity aversion, robustness, and the variational representation of preferences. Econometrica 74(6):1447–1498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mao T, Wang R (2020) Risk aversion in regulatory capital calculation. SIAM J. Financial Math. 11(1):169–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McNeil AJ, Frey R, Embrechts P (2015) Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools, revised ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Müller A (1998) Another tale of two tails: On characterizations of comparative risk. J. Risk Uncertainty 16(2):187–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Müller A, Scarsini M, Tsetlin I, Winkler RL (2017) Between first and second-order stochastic dominance. Management Sci. 63(9):2933–2947.Link, Google Scholar
• Murofushi T, Sugeno M (1993) Some quantities represented by the Choquet integral. Fuzzy Sets Systems 56(2):229–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Natarajan K, Pachamanova D, Sim M (2008) Incorporating asymmetric distributional information in robust value-at-risk optimization. Management Sci. 54(3):573–585.Link, Google Scholar
• Penot J-P (2005) The bearing of duality in microeconomics. Advances in Mathematical Economics (Springer, Berlin), 113–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinov AM, Andramonov MY (1999) Minimizing increasing star-shaped functions based on abstract convexity. J. Global Optim. 15(1):19–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinov AM, Yagubov AA (1986) The space of star-shaped sets and its applications in nonsmooth optimization. Math. Programming Stud. 29:176–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub T (2007) Reasons for Frequent Failure in Mergers and Acquisitions: A Comprehensive Analysis (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang R, Ziegel JF (2021) Scenario-based risk evaluation. Finance Stochastics 25(4):725–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang R, Zitikis R (2021) An axiomatic foundation for the expected shortfall. Management Sci. 67(3):1413–1429.Link, Google Scholar
• Xue J (2020) Preferences with changing ambiguity aversion. Econom. Theory 69(1):1–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaffaroni A (2004) Is every radiant function the sum of quasiconvex functions? Math. Methods Oper. Res. 59(2):221–233.Crossref, Google Scholar