Sequential Mechanisms with Ex Post Individual Rationality

References

• Adams WJ, Yellen JL (1976) Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quart. J. Econom. 90(3):475–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M, Rochet J-C (1999) Multi-dimensional screening: A user’s guide. Eur. Econom. Rev. 43(4-6):959–979.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balseiro SR, Mirrokni VS, Leme RP (2018) Dynamic mechanisms with martingale utilities. Management Sci. 64(11):5062–5082.Link, Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Välimäki J (2010) The dynamic pivot mechanism. Econometrica 78(2):771–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Castro F, Weintraub GY (2020) The scope of sequential screening with ex post participation constraints. J. Econom. Theory 188:105055.Google Scholar
• Boleslavsky R, Said M (2012) Progressive screening: Long-term contracting with a privately known stochastic process. Rev. Econom. Stud. 80(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai Y, Devanur NR, Weinberg SM (2019) A duality-based unified approach to Bayesian mechanism design. SIAM J. Comput. 50(3):160–200.Google Scholar
• Carroll G (2017) Robustness and separation in multidimensional screening. Econometrica 85(2):453–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clementi GL, Hopenhayn HA (2006) A theory of financing constraints and firm dynamics. Quart. J. Econom. 121(1):229–265.Google Scholar
• Courty P, Li H (2000) Sequential screening. Rev. Econom. Stud. 67(4):697–717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daskalakis C, Deckelbaum A, Tzamos C (2014) The complexity of optimal mechanism design. Preprint, submitted March 30, https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.1703.Google Scholar
• Daskalakis C, Deckelbaum A, Tzamos C (2017) Strong duality for a multiple-good monopolist. Econometrica 85(3):735–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeMarzo PM, Sannikov Y (2006) Optimal security design and dynamic capital structure in a continuous-time agency model. J. Finance 61(6):2681–2724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eső P, Szentes B (2007) Optimal information disclosure in auctions and the handicap auction. Rev. Econom. Stud. 74(3):705–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garrett DF (2016) Intertemporal price discrimination: Dynamic arrivals and changing values. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(11):3275–3299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gershkov A, Moldovanu B (2009) Dynamic revenue maximization with heterogeneous objects: A mechanism design approach. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 1(2):168–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gershkov A, Moldovanu B (2010) Efficient sequential assignment with incomplete information. Games Econom. Behav. 68(1):144–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green EJ (1987) Lending and the smoothing of uninsurable income. Prescott EC, Wallace N, eds. Contractual Arrangements for Intertemporal Trade (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis), 3–25.Google Scholar
• Grillo E, Ortner J (2018) Dynamic contracting with limited liability constraints. Unpublished working paper, Collegio Carlo Alberto, Turin, Italy.Google Scholar
• Kakade SM, Lobel I, Nazerzadeh H (2013) Optimal dynamic mechanism design and the virtual-pivot mechanism. Oper. Res. 61(4):837–854.Link, Google Scholar
• Krähmer D, Strausz R (2015) Optimal sales contracts with withdrawal rights. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(2):762–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krähmer D, Strausz R (2016) Optimality of sequential screening with multiple units and ex post participation constraints. Econom. Lett. 142(May 2016):64–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krähmer D, Strausz R (2017) Sequential vs. static screening: An equivalence result. Games Econom. Behav. 106(November 2017):317–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishna RV, Lopomo G, Taylor CR (2013) Stairway to heaven or highway to hell: Liquidity, sweat equity, and the uncertain path to ownership. RAND J. Econom. 44(1):104–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manelli AM, Vincent DR (2007) Multidimensional mechanism design: Revenue maximization and the multiple-good monopoly. J. Econom. Theory 137(1):153–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee RP, McMillan J, Whinston MD (1989) Multiproduct monopoly, commodity bundling, and correlation of values. Quart. J. Econom. 104(2):371–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mirrokni VS, Paes Leme R, Tang P, Zuo S (2016) Optimal dynamic mechanisms with ex-post IR via bank accounts. Preprint, submitted July 6, https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.08840.Google Scholar
• Mirrokni V, Paes Leme R, Tang P, Zuo S (2020) Non-clairvoyant dynamic mechanism design. Econometrica 88(5):1939–1963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pai M, Vohra RV (2008) Optimal dynamic auctions. Technical report, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou C, Pierrakos G, Psomas C, Rubinstein A (2022) On the complexity of dynamic mechanism design. Games Econom. Behav. 134:399–427.Google Scholar
• Pavan A, Segal I, Toikka J (2014) Dynamic mechanism design: A Myersonian approach. Econometrica 82(2):601–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Chone P (1998) Ironing, sweeping, and multidimensional screening. Econometrica 66(4):783–826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sappington D (1983) Limited liability contracts between principal and agent. J. Econom. Theory 29(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spear SE, Srivastava S (1987) On repeated moral hazard with discounting. Rev. Econom. Stud. 54(4):599–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ (1963) United States v. Loew’s Inc.: A note on block-booking. Supreme Court Rev. 1963:152–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Worrall T (1990) Income fluctuation and asymmetric information: An example of a repeated principal-agent problem. J. Econom. Theory 51(2):367–390.Crossref, Google Scholar