Procurement Mechanisms with Post-Auction Pre-Award Cost-Reduction Investigations
References
- (2004) Investment incentives in procurement auctions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Single crossing properties and the existence of pure strategy equilibria in games of incomplete information. Econometrica 69(4):861–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Optimal auction design and R & D. Eur. Econom. Rev. 41(9):1655–1674.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Approximations to stochastic dynamic programs via information relaxation duality. Oper. Res. 67(2):577–597.Abstract, Google Scholar
- (2018) When to deploy test auctions in sourcing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(2):232–248.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Dynamic cost reduction through process improvement in assembly networks. Management Sci. 55(4):552–567.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) Imperfect commitment and the revelation principle: The multi-agent case. Econom. Lett. 69(2):165–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Contracting with imperfect commitment and the revelation principle: The single agent case. Econometrica 69(4):1077–1098.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) The effect of bidders’ asymmetries on expected revenue in auctions. Games Econom. Behav. 62(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
- CAPS Research (2009) Caps research snapshots: Use of reverse auctions. Institute for Supply Management and W.P. Carey School of Business at ASU, Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar
- (1993) Design competition through multidimensional auctions. RAND J. Econom. 24(4):668–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Optimal procurement auction under multi-stage supplier qualification. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(3):566–582.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Sourcing through auctions and audits. Production Oper. Management 17(2):121–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) The strategic benefit of request for proposal/quotation. Oper. Res. 70(3):1410–1427.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Procurement for assembly under asymmetric information: Theory and evidence. Management Sci. 68(4):2694–2713.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Whether to open Pandora’s box. J. Econom. Theory 175:127–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Auctions with e-sourcing events. Production Oper. Management 16(4):409–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Optimal information revelation in procurement schemes. RAND J. Econom. 38(2):400–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Optimal procurement mechanisms for assembly. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):655–666.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) A principal-agent model for product specification and production. Management Sci. 51(1):106–119.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Managing supplier competition and sourcing sequence for component manufacturing. Production Oper. Management 24(2):287–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Supplier development and integration in competitive supply chains. Production Oper. Management 28(5):1256–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Kalkoffen M, Momin Z, Sticher G (2007) Getting to win-win: How Toyota creates and sustains best-practice supplier relationships. Boston Consulting Group Perspect. 1–10.Google Scholar
- (2009) Total-cost procurement auctions: Impact of suppliers’ cost adjustments on auction format choice. Management Sci. 55(12):1985–1999.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Optimal procurement contracts with pre-project planning. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(3):1015–1041.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Krishna V (2009) Auction Theory (Academic Press, Burlington, MA).Google Scholar
- (1999) First price auctions in the asymmetric n bidder case. Internat. Econom. Rev. 40(1):125–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Supplier competition and cost reduction with endogenous information asymmetry. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(5):996–1010.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Supplier competition and cost improvement. Management Sci. 63(8):2460–2477.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) On the analysis of asymmetric first price auctions. J. Econom. Theory 152:1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Equilibrium in sealed high bid auctions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 67(3):439–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) Bidding for contracts: A principal-agent analysis. RAND J. Econom. 17(3):326–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) Multistage games with communication. Econometrica 54(2):323–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Cost-reducing investment, optimal procurement and implementation by auctions. Internat. Econom. Rev. 37(3):663–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) On e-auctions for procurement operations. Production Oper. Management 16(4):404–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) An analysis of scoring and buyer-determined procurement auctions. Production Oper. Management 24(1):147–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The revelation principle in multistage games. Rev. Econom. Stud. 88(3):1503–1540.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Entry and R & D in procurement contracting. J. Econom. Theory 58(1):41–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Commerce (2021) 2018–2019 annual survey of manufacturers. Bureau of the Census. Accessed August 22, 2021, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/asm/data.html.Google Scholar
- (2009) RFQ auctions with supplier qualification screening. Oper. Res. 57(4):934–949.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) When does it pay to delay supplier qualification? Theory and experiments. Management Sci. 58(11):2057–2075.Link, Google Scholar
- (1979) Optimal search for the best alternatives. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Now or later? When to deploy qualification screening in open-bid auction for re-sourcing. Oper. Res. 69(6):1715–1733.Link, Google Scholar

