Partial Recovery in the Graph Alignment Problem

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2355

References

  • Abbe E (2017) Community detection and stochastic block models: Recent developments. J. Machine Learn. Res. 18(1):6446–6531.Google Scholar
  • Almohamad H, Duffuaa SO (1993) A linear programming approach for the weighted graph matching problem. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intelligence 15(5):522–525.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banerjee S, Hegde N, Massoulié L (2012) The price of privacy in untrusted recommendation engines. 50th Annual Allerton Conf. Comm. Control Comput. (Allerton) (IEEE), 920–927.Google Scholar
  • Barak B, Chou CN, Lei Z, Schramm T, Sheng Y (2018) (Nearly) efficient algorithms for the graph matching problem on correlated random graphs. Preprint, submitted May 7, https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.02349.Google Scholar
  • Bayati M, Gleich DF, Saberi A, Wang Y (2013) Message-passing algorithms for sparse network alignment. ACM Trans. Knowledge Discovery Data 7(1):1–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollobás B (1982) Distinguishing vertices of random graphs. North-Holland Math. Stud. 62:33–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conte D, Foggia P, Sansone C, Vento M (2004) Thirty years of graph matching in pattern recognition. Internat. J. Pattern Recognition Artificial Intelligence 18(3):265–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cover TM, Thomas JA (2012) Elements of Information Theory (John Wiley & Sons, United Kingdom).Google Scholar
  • Cullina D, Kiyavash N (2016) Improved achievability and converse bounds for Erdös-Rényi graph matching. Performance Evaluation Rev. 44(1):63–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cullina D, Kiyavash N (2017) Exact alignment recovery for correlated Erdös-Rényi graphs. Preprint, submitted November 18, https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06783.Google Scholar
  • Cullina D, Kiyavash N, Mittal P, Poor HV (2019) Partial recovery of Erdös-Rényi graph alignment via k-core alignment. Proc. ACM Measurement and Analysis of Comput. Systems 3(3):1–21.Google Scholar
  • Czajka T, Pandurangan G (2008) Improved random graph isomorphism. J. Discrete Algorithms 6(1):85–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dai OE, Cullina D, Kiyavash N, Grossglauser M (2018) On the performance of a canonical labeling for matching correlated Erdös-Rényi graphs. Preprint, submitted April 25, https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.09758.Google Scholar
  • Ding J, Ma Z, Wu Y, Xu J (2021) Efficient random graph matching via degree profiles. Probab. Theory Related Fields 179(1):29–115.Google Scholar
  • Dym N, Maron H, Lipman Y (2017) Ds++: A flexible, scalable and provably tight relaxation for matching problems. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 36(6):1–14.Google Scholar
  • Elmsallati A, Clark C, Kalita J (2015) Global alignment of protein-protein interaction networks: A survey. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinformatics 13(4):689–705.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fan Z, Mao C, Wu Y, Xu J (2019a) Spectral graph matching and regularized quadratic relaxations I: The Gaussian model. Preprint, submitted July 20, https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.08880.Google Scholar
  • Fan Z, Mao C, Wu Y, Xu J (2019b) Spectral graph matching and regularized quadratic relaxations II: Erdös-Rényi graphs and universality. Preprint, submitted July 20, https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.08883.Google Scholar
  • Feizi S, Quon G, Mendoza M, Medard M, Kellis M, Jadbabaie A(2019) Spectral alignment of graphs. IEEE Trans. Network Sci. Engrg. 7(3):1182–1197CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fishkind DE, Adali S, Patsolic HG, Meng L, Lyzinski V, Priebe CE(2012) Seeded graph matching. Preprint, submitted September 3, https://arxiv.org/abs/1209.0367.Google Scholar
  • Fogel F, Jenatton R, Bach F, d’Aspremont A (2013) Convex relaxations for permutation problems. Adv. Neural Inform. Processes Systems 26:1016–1024.Google Scholar
  • Ganassali L, Massoulié L (2020) From tree matching to sparse graph alignment. Conf. Learn. Theory (PMLR).Google Scholar
  • Kazemi E, Hassani SH, Grossglauser M (2015a) Growing a graph matching from a handful of seeds. Proc. VLDB Endowment 8(10):1010–1021.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kazemi E, Yartseva L, Grossglauser M (2015b) When can two unlabeled networks be aligned under partial overlap? 53rd Annual Allerton Conf. Comm. Control Comput. (IEEE), 33–42.Google Scholar
  • Kezurer I, Kovalsky SZ, Basri R, Lipman Y (2015) Tight relaxation of quadratic matching. Comput. Graphics Forum 34(5):115–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuchaiev O, Milenković T, Memišević V, Hayes W, Pržulj N (2010) Topological network alignment uncovers biological function and phylogeny. J. Roy. Soc. Interface 7(50):1341–1354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lacoste-Julien S, Taskar B, Klein D, Jordan MI (2006) Word alignment via quadratic assignment. Proc. Main Conf. Human Language Tech. Conf. North Amer. Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (Association for Computational Linguistics), 112–119.Google Scholar
  • Lyzinski V, Fishkind D, Fiori M, Vogelstein J, Priebe C, Sapiro G(2016) Graph matching: Relax at your own risk. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intelligence 38(1):60–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacCartney B, Galley M, Manning CD (2008) A phrase-based alignment model for natural language inference. Proc. Conf. Empirical Methods Natural Language Processing (Association for Computational Linguistics), 802–811.Google Scholar
  • Malod-Dognin N, Pržulj N (2015) L-GRAAL: Lagrangian graphlet-based network aligner. Bioinformatics 31(13):2182–2189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mossel E, Xu J (2019) Seeded graph matching via large neighborhood statistics. Proc. 30th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SIAM), 1005–1014.Google Scholar
  • Narayanan A, Shmatikov V (2006) How to break anonymity of the Netflix prize data set. Preprint, submitted October 18, https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0610105.Google Scholar
  • Narayanan A, Shmatikov V (2009) De-anonymizing social networks. 2009 30th IEEE Sympos. Security Privacy (IEEE), 173–187.Google Scholar
  • Pedarsani P, Grossglauser M (2011) On the privacy of anonymized networks. Proc. 17th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining, 1235–1243.Google Scholar
  • Pittel B, Spencer J, Wormald N (1996) Sudden emergence of a giant k-core in a random graph. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 67(1):111–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Read RC, Corneil DG (1977) The graph isomorphism disease. J. Graph Theory 1(4):339–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rendl F, Pardalos P, Wolkowicz H (1994) The quadratic assignment problem: A survey and recent developments. Proc. DIMACS Workshop Quadratic Assignment Problems, vol. 16, 1–42.Google Scholar
  • Sahni S, Gonzalez T (1976) P-complete approximation problems. J. ACM 23(3):555–565.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Santhanam NP, Wainwright MJ (2012) Information-theoretic limits of selecting binary graphical models in high dimensions. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 58(7):4117–4134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sason I, Verdú S (2016) f-divergence inequalities. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 62(11):5973–6006.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scheinerman ER, Ullman DH (2011) Fractional Graph Theory: A Rational Approach to the Theory of Graphs (Courier Corporation).Google Scholar
  • Schellewald C, Schnörr C (2005) Probabilistic subgraph matching based on convex relaxation. Internat. Workshop Energy Minimization Methods Comput. Vision Pattern Recognition (Springer), 171–186.Google Scholar
  • Shirani F, Garg S, Erkip E (2018) Typicality matching for pairs of correlated graphs. 2018 IEEE Internat. Sympos. Inform. Theory (IEEE), 221–225.Google Scholar
  • Singh R, Xu J, Berger B (2008) Global alignment of multiple protein interaction networks with application to functional orthology detection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105(35):12763–12768.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Umeyama S (1988) An eigendecomposition approach to weighted graph matching problems. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intelligence 10(5):695–703.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vogelstein JT, Conroy JM, Lyzinski V, Podrazik LJ, Kratzer SG, Harley ET, Fishkind DE, Vogelstein RJ, Priebe CE (2015) Fast approximate quadratic programming for graph matching. PLoS One. 10(4):e0121002.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright EM (1971) Graphs on unlabelled nodes with a given number of edges. Acta Math. 126:1–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu Y, Xu J, Yu SH (2022) Settling the sharp reconstruction thresholds of random graph matching. IEEE Transactions Inform. Theory 68(8):5391–5417.Google Scholar
  • Yartseva L, Grossglauser M (2013) On the performance of percolation graph matching. Proc. First ACM Conf. Online Social Networks (ACM), 119–130.Google Scholar
  • Zaslavskiy M, Bach F, Vert JP (2008) A path following algorithm for the graph matching problem. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intelligence 31(12):2227–2242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang S, Yang J, Jin W (2010) Sapper: Subgraph indexing and approximate matching in large graphs. Proc. VLDB Endowment 3(1–2):1185–1194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao Q, Karisch SE, Rendl F, Wolkowicz H (1998) Semidefinite programming relaxations for the quadratic assignment problem. J. Combin. Optim. 2(1):71–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.