On the Design of Public Debate in Social Networks
References
- (2010) Spread of (mis)information in social networks. Games Econom. Behav. 70(2):194–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Opinion fluctuations and disagreement in social networks. Math. Oper. Res. 38(1):1–27.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Recent advances in the modelling and analysis of opinion dynamics on influence networks. Internat. J. Automation Comput. 16(2):129–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) The dissemination of culture, a model with local convergence and global polarization. J. Conflict Resolution 41(2):203–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Opinion polarization by learning from social feedback. J. Math. Sociol. 43(2):76–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) On the 2R conjecture for multi-agent systems. Eur. Control Conf. (IEEE, Kos, Greece), 874–881.Google Scholar
- (2022) Polarization when people choose their peers. Preprint, submitted March 26, 2022, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3245800. Google Scholar
- (2017) The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110(15):5791–5796.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Adv. Complex Systems 3(1):87–98.Google Scholar
- (1974) Reaching a consensus. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 69(345):118–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Persuasion bias, social influence, and unidimensional opinions. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):909–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Have American’s social attitudes become more polarized? Amer. J. Sociol. 102(3):690–755.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Consensus formation under bounded confidence. Nonlinear Anal. 47(7):4615–4621.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) How to hold social media accountable for undermining democracy. Harvard Bus. Rev., January 11, 2021.Google Scholar
- (2018) Systemic social media regulation. Duke Law Tech. Rev. 16(1):393–439.Google Scholar
- (1956) A formal theory of social power. Psych. Rev. 63(3):181–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Social influence and opinions. J. Math. Sociol. 15(3–4):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) What will tech regulation look like in the Biden era? Harvard Bus. Rev., December 17, 2020.Google Scholar
- (2021) Are we entering a new era of social media regulation? Harvard Bus. Rev., January 14, 2021.Google Scholar
- (2010) Naïve learning in social networks and the wisdom of crowds. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 2(1):112–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Learning in social networks. Bramoullé Y, Galeotti A, Rogers BW, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Networks (Oxford University Press, New York), 504–542.Google Scholar
- (2020) Augmenting polarization via social media? A comparative analysis of Trump’s and Wilders’ online populist communication and the electorate’s interpretations surrounding the elections. Acta Politica 55(3):331–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence, models, analysis and simulation. J. Artificial Soc. Soc. Simulation 5(3):1–33.Google Scholar
- (2019) The power of Trump-speak: Populist crisis narratives and ontological security. Cambridge Rev. Internat. Affairs 32(3):344–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Consensus formation on adaptive networks. Phys. Rev. E 77(1):016102.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) A discrete nonlinear and nonautonomous model of consensus formation. Elaydi S, Ladas G, Popenda J, Rakowski J, eds. Communications in Difference Equations (Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam), 227–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Measuring emergent social phenomena: Dynamism, polarization, and clustering as order parameters of social systems. Behav. Sci. 39(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Consensus vs. dissensus over the ‘civil state’ model: A key to understanding the diverse outcomes of the Arab Spring in Egypt and Tunisia. British J. Middle Eastern Stud. 48(3):455–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(22):9020–9025.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Was the revolution tweeted? Social media and the Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia. Digest of Middle East Stud. 25(1):155–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Cultural integration and differentiation in groups and organizations. Dignum V, Dignum F, eds. Perspectives on Culture and Agent-based Simulations: Integrating Cultures (Springer, Berlin), 71–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Global Political Campaigning: A Worldwide Analysis of Campaign Professionals and Their Practices (Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, CT).Google Scholar
- (2018) A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks (ii). Preprint, submitted January 20, https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.06719v1.Google Scholar
- (2006) Non-negative Matrices and Markov Chains. Springer Series in Statistics (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
- (1998) The Spaces of Democracy (University of Michigan, College of Architecture + Urban Planning, Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
- (2021) Behavior, opinion formation, and cultural identity in social networks. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
- (2016) The evolution of beliefs over signed social networks. Oper. Res. 64(3):585–604.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Opinion dynamics: Models, extensions and external effects. Loreto V, Haklay M, Hotho A, Servedio V, Stumme G, Theunis J, Tria V, eds. Participatory Sensing, Opinions and Collective Awareness (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 363–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
- (2013) Binary opinion dynamics with stubborn agents. ACM Trans. Econom. Comput. 1(4):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar

