Equilibrium Identification and Selection in Finite Games

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2413

References

  • Aboolian R, Berman O, Krass D (2007) Competitive facility location and design problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 182:40–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson E, Chen B, Shao L (2017) Supplier competition with option contracts for discrete blocks of capacity. Oper. Res. 65(4):952–967.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aumann RJ (1990) Nash equilibria are not enforceable. Gabszewicz J, Richard JF, Wolsey L, eds. Economic Decision-Making: Games, Econometrics and Optimization (Elsevier, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  • Barnhart C, Johnson EL, Nemhauser GL, Savelsbergh MWP, Vance H (1998) Branch-and-price: Column generation for solving huge integer programs. Oper. Res. 46(3):293–432.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beresnev V (2018) Competitive facility location and design problem. http://www.math.nsc.ru/AP/benchmarks/Design/design_en.html.Google Scholar
  • Cachon GP, Zipkin PH (1999) Competitive and cooperative inventory policies in a two-stage supply chain. Management Sci. 45(7):936–953.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carvalho M, Lodi A, Pedroso JP (2018) Existence of Nash equilibria on integer programming games. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, 223:11–23.Google Scholar
  • Carvalho M, Lodi A, Pedroso JP (2022) Computing equilibria for integer programming games. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 303(3):1057–1070.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carvalho M, Dragotto G, Lodi A, Sankaranarayanan S (2021) The cut and play algorithm: Computing Nash equilibria via outer approximations. Preprint, submitted November 10, https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.05726.Google Scholar
  • Charness G, Feri F, Meléndez Jiménez MA, Sutter M (2014) Experimental games on networks: Underpinnings of behavior and equilibrium selection. Econometrica 82(5):1615–1670.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dixit A (1980) The role of investment in entry-deterrence. Econom J. 90(357):95.Google Scholar
  • Dobson G, Karmarkar US (1987) Competitive location on a network. Oper. Res. 35(4):565–574.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dragotto G, Sankaranarayanan S, Carvalho M, Lodi A (2021) ZERO: Playing mathematical programming games. Preprint, submitted November 15, https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.07932.Google Scholar
  • Drezner T, Drezner Z, Kalczynski P (2020) Gradual cover competitive facility location. OR Spectrum 42(2):333–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Facchinei F, Kanzow C (2007) Generalized Nash equilibrium problems. 4OR 5(3):173–210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Federgruen A, Hu M (2015) Multi-product price and assortment competition. Oper. Res. 63(3):572–584.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M, Tamir T (2012) Conflicting congestion effects in resource allocation games. Oper. Res. 60(3):529–540.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Friesz TL, Bernstein D (2016) Nash Games. Complex Networks and Dynamic Systems 3: Foundations of Network Optimization and Games (Springer, Boston), 265–323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harsanyi J (1995) A new theory of equilibrium selection for games with complete information. Games Econom. Behav. 10(2):91–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harsanyi J, Selten R (1988) A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Hemmecke R, Onn S, Weismantel R (2009) Nash-equilibria and N-fold integer programming. Preprint, submitted March 26, http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.4577.Google Scholar
  • Henk M, Richter-Gebert J, Ziegler GM (2017) Basic properties of convex polytopes. Goodman JE, O’Rourke J, Toth CD, eds. Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry, 3rd ed. (Chapman and Hall/CRC), 243–270.Google Scholar
  • Huppmann D, Siddiqui S (2018) An exact solution method for binary equilibrium problems with compensation and the power market uplift problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 266(2):622–638.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Köppe M, Ryan CT, Queyranne M (2011) Rational generating functions and integer programming games. Oper. Res. 59(6):1445–1460.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koutsoupias E, Papadimitriou C, Meinel C, Tison S, eds. (1999) Worst-Case Equilibria. STACS 99 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg), 404–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lemke CE, Howson JT Jr (1964) Equilibrium points of bimatrix games. J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math. 12(2):413–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman SA, McCardle KF (1997) The competitive newsboy. Oper. Res. 45(1):54–65.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Muter I, Birbil SI, Bülbül K (2013) Simultaneous column-and-row generation for large-scale linear programs with column-dependent-rows. Math. Programming 142(1–2):47–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myerson RB (1978) Refinements of the Nash equilibrium concept. Internat. J. Game Theory 7(2):73–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nash J (1951) Non-cooperative games. Ann. Math. 54(2):286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Netessine S, Shumsky RA (2005) Revenue management games: Horizontal and vertical competition. Management Sci. 51(5):813–831.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nisan N, Roughgarden T, Tardos E, Varzirani VV, eds. (2007) Algorithmic Game Theory (Cambridge University Press).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Östling R, Tao-yi WJ, Chou EY, Camerer CF (2011) Testing game theory in the field: Swedish LUPI lottery games. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 3(3):1–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter R, Nudelman E, Shoham Y (2004) Simple search methods for finding a Nash equilibrium. Proc. National Conf. Artificial Intelligence, 664–669.Google Scholar
  • Röller LH, Tombak MM (1993) Competition and investment in flexible technologies. Management Sci. 39(1):107–114.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sagratella S (2016) Computing all solutions of Nash equilibrium problems with discrete strategy sets. SIAM J. Optim. 26(4):2190–2218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sagratella S (2017a) Algorithms for generalized potential games with mixed-integer variables. Comput. Optim. Appl. 68(3):689–717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sagratella S (2017b) Computing equilibria of Cournot oligopoly models with mixed-integer quantities. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 86(3):549–565.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sagratella S (2019) On generalized Nash equilibrium problems with linear coupling constraints and mixed-integer variables. Optim. 68(1):197–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sagratella S, Schmidt M, Sudermann-Merx N (2020) The noncooperative fixed charge transportation problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 284(1):373–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandholm T, Gilpin A, Conitzer V (2005) Mixed-integer programming methods for finding Nash equilibria. Proc. National Conf. Artificial Intelligence, 2:495–501.Google Scholar
  • Selten R (1975) Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games. Internat. J. Game Theory 4(1):25–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Serra D, Marianov V, ReVelle C (1992) The maximum-capture hierarchical location problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 62(3):363–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spence AM (1977) Entry, capacity, investment and oligopolistic pricing. Bell J. Econom. 8(2):534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stein ND, Ozdaglar A, Parrilo PA (2008) Separable and low-rank continuous games. Internat. J. Game Theory 37(4):475–504.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Stengel B (2007) Equilibrium computation for two-player games in strategic and extensive form. Nisan N, Roughgarden T, Tardos E, Varzirani VV, eds. Algorithmic Game Theory (Cambridge University Press), 53–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.