Distinguishing Useful and Wasteful Slack

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2415

References

  • Afriat SN (1972) Efficiency estimation of production functions. Internat. Econom. Rev. 13(4):568–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrell PJ, Bogetoft P (2017) Theory, techniques and applications of regulatory benchmarking and productivity analysis. Grifell-Tatjé E, Knox Lovell CA, Sickles RC, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom), 523–555.Google Scholar
  • Agrell PJ, Bogetoft P, Tind J (2005) DEA and dynamic yardstick competition in scandinavian electricity distribution. J. Productivity Anal. 23(2):173–201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Antle R, Bogetoft P (2019) Mix stickiness under asymmetric cost information. Management Sci. 65(6):2787–2812.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Asmild M, Bogetoft P, Hougaard JL (2009) Rationalising DEA estimated inefficiencies. J. Bus. Econom. 4:81–86.Google Scholar
  • Asmild M, Bogetoft P, Hougaard JL (2013a) Rationalizing inefficiency: Staff utilization in branches of a large Canadian bank. Omega 41(1):80–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asmild M, Hougaard JL, Olesen OB (2013b) Testing over-representation of observations in subsets of a DEA technology. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 230(1):88–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banker RD, Maindiratta A (1988) Nonparametric analysis of technical and allocative efficiencies in production. Econometrica 56(6):1315–1332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barber CB, Dubkin DP, Huhdanpaa HT (1996) The quickhull algorithm for convex hull. ACM Trans. Math. Software 22(4):469–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnard CI (1938) Functions of the Executive (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1351–1408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N, Lemos R, Sadun R, Scur D, Van Reenen J (2014) The new empirical economics of management. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 12(4):835–876.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bogetoft P (1994a) Incentive efficient production frontiers: An agency perspective on DEA. Management Sci. 40(8):959–968.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bogetoft P (1994b) Non-Cooperative Planning Theory (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bogetoft P (1995) Incentives and productivity measurements. Internat. J. Production Econom. 39(1):67–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bogetoft P (1997) DEA-based yardstick competition: The optimality of best practice regulation. Ann. Oper. Res. 73:277–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bogetoft P (2000) DEA and activity planning under asymmetric information. J. Productivity Anal. 13:7–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bogetoft P, Andersen J (2009) Rational inefficiency in fishery. J. Bus. Econom. 4:63–79.Google Scholar
  • Bogetoft P, Hougaard JL (2003) Rational inefficiencies. J. Productivity Anal. 20:243–271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bogetoft P, Otto L (2011) Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourgeois LJ (1981) On the measurement of organizational slack. Acad. Management Rev. 6(1):29–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradley SW, Wiklund J, Shepherd DA (2011) Swinging a double-edged sword: The effect of slack on entrepreneurial management and growth. J. Bus. Venturing 26:537–554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bromiley P (1991) Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. 34(1):37–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bronars S (1987) The power of nonparametric tests of preference maximization. Econometrica 55(3):693–698.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chavas JP, Cox TL (1990) A nonparametric analysis of productivity: The case of U.S. and Japanese manufacturing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(3):450–464.Google Scholar
  • Chavas JP, Cox TL (1993) On generalized revealed preference analysis. Quart. J. Econom. 108(2):493–506.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chavas JP, Cox TL (1995) On non-parametric supply response analysis. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 77(1):80–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen SX, Liu JS (1997) Statistical applications of the Poisson-binomial and conditional Bernoulli distributions. Statist. Sinica 7:875–892.Google Scholar
  • Chernoff H (1952) A measure of asymptotic efficiency for tests of a hypothesis based on the sum of observations. Ann. Math. Statist. 23(4):493–507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert RM, March J (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Daniel F, Lohrke FT, Fornaciari CJ, Turner RA (2004) Slack resources and firm performance: A meta-analysis. J. Bus. Res. 57(6):565–574.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Debreu G (1951) The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica 19(3):273–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (1995) Non-parametric tests of regularity, Farrell efficiency, and goodness of fit. J. Econometrics 69(2):415–425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Series A 120(3):253–281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith JR (1973) Designing Complex Organizations (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Galbraith JR (1974) Organizational design: An information processing view. Interfaces 4(3):28–36.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hanoch G, Rothschild M (1972) Testing assumptions of production theory: A nonparametric approach. J. Political Econom. 80(2):256–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herold DM, Jayaraman N, Narayanaswamy CR (2006) What is the relationship between organizational slack and innovation? J. Management Issues 18(3):372–392.Google Scholar
  • Hvide HK, Moen J (2010) Lean and hungry or fat and content? Entrepreneurs’ wealth and start-up performance. Management Sci. 56(8):1242–1258.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M, Meckling W (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior agency cost and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koopmans TC (1951) Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Leibenstein H (1966) Allocative efficiency vs. ‘X-efficiency.’ Amer. Econom. Rev. 56(3):392–415.Google Scholar
  • Leibenstein H (1978) X-inefficiency Xists: Reply to an Xorcist. Amer. Econom. Rev. 68:203–211.Google Scholar
  • March J, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • O’Toole LJ Jr, Meier KJ (2010) In defense of bureaucracy: Public managerial capacity, slack and the dampening of environmental shocks. Public Management Rev. 12(3):341–361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pierce JR, Ahuinis H (2013) The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect in management. J. Management 39(2):313–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubinstein RY (1982) Generating random vectors uniformly distributed inside and on the surface of different regions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 10(2):205–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samuelson P (1947) Foundations of Economic Analysis (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Selten R (1991) Properties of a measure of predictive success. Math. Social Sci. 21(2):153–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shah BK (1994) On the distribution of the sum of independent integer valued random variables. Amer. Statist. 27(3):123–124.Google Scholar
  • Shephard RW (1970) Theory of Cost and Production Functions (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Singh J (1986) Performance slack and risk taking in organizational decision making. Acad. Management J. 29(3):562–585.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stigler G (1976) The xistence of x-efficiency. Amer. Econom. Rev. 66(1):213–216.Google Scholar
  • Tan J, Peng MW (2003) Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management J. 24(13):1249–1263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tervonen T, van Valkenhoef G, Baştürk N, Postmus D (2013) Hit-and-run enables efficient weight generation for simulation-based multiple criteria decision analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 224(3):552–559.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tseng CH, Tansuhaj P, Hallagan W, McCullough J (2007) Effect of firm resources on growth of multinationality. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 38(6):961–974.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Valkenhoef G, Tervonen T, Postmus D (2014) Notes on ‘hit-and-run enables efficient weight generation for simulation-based multiple criteria decision analysis.’ Eur. J. Oper. Res. 239(3):865–867.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian HR (1984) The non-parametric approach to production analysis. Econometrica 52(3):279–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian HR (1985) Non-parametric analysis of optimizing behavior with measurement error. J. Econometrics 30(1):445–458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian HR (1990) Goodness-of-fit in optimizing models. J. Econometrics 46:125–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson OE (1963) Managerial descretion and business behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 53(5):1032–1057.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.