Statistical Inference for Aggregation of Malmquist Productivity Indices

References

• Badunenko O, Henderson DJ, Zelenyuk V (2008) Technological change and transition: Relative contributions to worldwide growth during the 1990s. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 70(4):461–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brennan S, Haelermans C, Ruggiero J (2014) Nonparametric estimation of education productivity incorporating nondiscretionary inputs with an application to Dutch schools. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 234(3):809–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE (1982) The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica 50(6):1393–1414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebert U, Welsch H (2004) Meaningful environmental indices: A social choice approach. J. Environ. Econom. Management 47(2):270–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Färe R, Grosskopf S (2004) New Directions: Efficiency and Productivity (Springer).Google Scholar
• Färe R, Primont D (1995) Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Färe R, Zelenyuk V (2003) On aggregate Farrell efficiencies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 146(3):615–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CK (1985) The Measurement of Efficiency of Production, vol. 6 (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(1):66–83.Google Scholar
• Färe R, He X, Li S, Zelenyuk V (2019) A unifying framework for Farrell profit efficiency measurement. Oper. Res. 67(1):183–197.Link, Google Scholar
• Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A 120(3):253–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gitto S, Mancuso P (2015) The contribution of physical and human capital accumulation to Italian regional growth: A nonparametric perspective. J. Production Anal. 43(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grifell-Tatjé E, Lovell CK (1995) A note on the Malmquist productivity index. Econom. Lett. 47(2):169–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson DJ, Zelenyuk V (2007) Testing for (efficiency) catching-up. Southern Econom. J. 73(4):1003–1019.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson AL, Ruggiero J (2014) Nonparametric measurement of productivity and efficiency in education. Ann. Oper. Res. 221(1):197–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kasy M (2019) Uniformity and the delta method. J. Econom. Methods 8(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kneip A, Simar L, Wilson PW (2015) When bias kills the variance: Central limit theorems for DEA and FDH efficiency scores. Econometric Theory 31(2):394–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kneip A, Simar L, Wilson PW (2016) Testing hypotheses in nonparametric models of production. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 34(3):435–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kneip A, Simar L, Wilson PW (2021) Inference in dynamic, nonparametric models of production: Central limit theorems for Malmquist indices. Econometric Theory 37(3):537–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Russell RR (2002) Technological change, technological catch-up, and capital deepening: Relative contributions to growth and convergence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(3):527–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olesen OB, Petersen NC (2016) Stochastic data envelopment analysis—A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 251(1):2–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parmeter CF, Zelenyuk V (2019) Combining the virtues of stochastic frontier and data envelopment analysis. Oper. Res. 67(6):1628–1658.Link, Google Scholar
• Pastor JM, Perez F, Quesada J (1997) Efficiency analysis in banking firms: An international comparison. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 98(2):395–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pilyavsky A, Staat M (2008) Efficiency and productivity change in Ukrainian healthcare. J. Production Anal. 29(2):143–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ray SC, Desli E (1997) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(5):1033–1039.Google Scholar
• Sickles R, Zelenyuk V (2019) Measurement of Productivity and Efficiency: Theory and Practice (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simar L, Wilson PW (2019) Central limit theorems and inference for sources of productivity change measured by nonparametric Malmquist indices. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 277(2):756–769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simar L, Zelenyuk V (2018) Central limit theorems for aggregate efficiency. Oper. Res. 66(1):137–149.Link, Google Scholar
• Simar L, Zelenyuk V (2020) Improving finite sample approximation by central limit theorems for estimates from data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 284(3):1002–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• ten Raa T (2011) Benchmarking and industry performance. J. Production Anal. 36(3):285–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tortosa-Ausina E, Grifell-Tatjé E, Armero C, Conesa D (2008) Sensitivity analysis of efficiency and Malmquist productivity indices: An application to Spanish savings banks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 184(3):1062–1084.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van der Vaart AW (2000) Asymptotic Statistics, vol. 3 (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Walheer B (2018) Aggregation of metafrontier technology gap ratios: The case of European sectors in 1995–2015. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 269(3):1013–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walheer B (2019) Aggregating Farrell efficiencies with private and public inputs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 276(3):1170–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang H, Ang B, Wang Q, Zhou P (2017) Measuring energy performance with sectoral heterogeneity: A non-parametric frontier approach. Energy Econom. 62:70–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ylvinger S (2000) Industry performance and structural efficiency measures: Solutions to problems in firm models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 121(1):164–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zelenyuk V (2006) Aggregation of Malmquist productivity indexes. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 174(2):1076–1086.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zelenyuk V (2014) Scale efficiency and homotheticity: Equivalence of primal and dual measures. J. Production Anal. 42(1):15–24.Crossref, Google Scholar