Sensitivity Analysis Under the f-Sensitivity Model: A Distributional Robustness Perspective

References

• Andrews I, Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM (2020) On the informativeness of descriptive statistics for structural estimates. Econometrica 88(6):2231–2258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bargagli-Stoffi FJ, Cadei R, Lee K, Dominici F (2020) Causal rule ensemble: Interpretable inference of heterogeneous treatment effects. Preprint, submitted September 18, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.09036.Google Scholar
• Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and Regression Trees (Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
• Chernozhukov V, Chetverikov D, Demirer M, Duflo E, Hansen C, Newey W, Robins J (2018) Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. J. Econometrics 21(1):1–68. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen T, Connault B (2023) Counterfactual sensitivity and robustness. Econometrica 91(1):263–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cleveland WS (1979) Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 74(368):829–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ (1988) Locally weighted regression: An approach to regression analysis by local fitting. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 83(403):596–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornfield J, Haenszel W, Hammond EC, Lilienfeld AM, Shimkin MB, Wynder EL (1959) Smoking and lung cancer: Recent evidence and a discussion of some questions. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 22(1):173–203.Google Scholar
• Cressie N, Read TRC (1984) Multinomial goodness-of-fit tests. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B Methodological 46(3):440–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csiszár I (1964) Eine Informationstheoretische Ungleichung und Ihre Anwendung auf Beweis der Ergodizitaet von Markoffschen Ketten. Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Matematikai Kutató Intézetének Közleményei 8(1–2):85–108.Google Scholar
• Daubechies I (1992) Ten Lectures on Wavelets (SIAM, Philadelphia).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding P, VanderWeele TJ (2016) Sensitivity analysis without assumptions. Epidemiology 27(3):368–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorn J, Guo K (2023) Sharp sensitivity analysis for inverse propensity weighting via quantile balancing. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 118(544):2645–2657.Google Scholar
• Dorn J, Guo K, Kallus N (2025) Doubly-valid/doubly-sharp sensitivity analysis for causal inference with unmeasured confounding. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 120(549):331–342.Google Scholar
• Duchi JC, Namkoong H (2021) Learning models with uniform performance via distributionally robust optimization. Ann. Statist. 49(3):1378–1406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher R (1958) Cigarettes, cancer, and statistics. Centennial Rev. Arts Sci. 2:151–166. Google Scholar
• Franks AM, D’Amour A, Feller A (2019) Flexible sensitivity analysis for observational studies without observable implications. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 115(532):1730–2746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gastwirth JL, Krieger AM, Rosenbaum PR (1998) Dual and simultaneous sensitivity analysis for matched pairs. Biometrika 85(4):907–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geman S, Hwang C-R (1982) Nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation by the method of sieves. Ann. Statist. 10(2):401–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green PJ, Silverman BW (1993) Nonparametric Regression and Generalized Linear Models: A Roughness Penalty Approach (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Rothenhäusler D (2023) The s-value: Evaluating stability with respect to distributional shifts. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 36:72058–72070.Google Scholar
• Ho TK (1995) Random decision forests. Proc. 3rd Internat. Conf. Document Anal. Recognition, vol. 1 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 278–282.Google Scholar
• Huang M, Pimentel SD (2025) Variance-based sensitivity analysis for weighting estimators result in more informative bounds. Biometrika 112(1):asae040.Google Scholar
• Imbens GW (2003) Sensitivity to exogeneity assumptions in program evaluation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(2):126–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Rubin DB (2015) Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ishikawa K, He N (2023) Kernel conditional moment constraints for confounding robust inference. Internat. Conf. Artificial Intelligence Statist. (PMLR, New York), 650–674.Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Rothenhäusler D (2024) Tailored inference for finite populations: Conditional validity and transfer across distributions. Biometrika 111(1):215–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Ren Z, Candès EJ (2023) Sensitivity analysis of individual treatment effects: A robust conformal inference approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120(6):e2214889120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kallus N, Mao X, Zhou A (2019) Interval estimation of individual-level causal effects under unobserved confounding. 22nd Internat. Conf. Artificial Intelligence Statist. (PMLR, New York), 2281–2290.Google Scholar
• Liese F, Vajda I (2006) On divergences and informations in statistics and information theory. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52(10):4394–4412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mallat S (1999) A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing (Elsevier, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
• Morimoto T (1963) Markov processes and the H-theorem. J. Physical Soc. Japan 18(3):328–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadaraya EA (1964) On estimating regression. Theory Probab. Its Appl. 9(1):141–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neyman J (1923) Sur les applications de la théorie des probabilités aux experiences agricoles: Essai des principes. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych 10(1):1–51.Google Scholar
• Nie X, Imbens G, Wager S (2021) Covariate balancing sensitivity analysis for extrapolating randomized trials across locations. Preprint, submitted December 9, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.04723.Google Scholar
• Pagan A, Ullah A, Gourieroux C, Phillips PC, Wickens M (1999) Nonparametric Econometrics, vol. 10 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, et al. (2011) Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J. Machine Learn. Res. 12(85):2825–2830.Google Scholar
• Rahimian H, Mehrotra S (2022) Distributionally robust optimization: A review. Open J. Math. Optim. 3(4):85.Google Scholar
• Rahman S (2016) The f-sensitivity index. SIAM/ASA J. Uncertainty Quantification 4(1):130–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rényi A (1961) On measures of entropy and information. Proc. Fourth Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. Probab. Vol. 1 Contributions Theory Statist., vol. 4 (University of California Press, Berkeley), 547–562.Google Scholar
• Robins JM, Rotnitzky A, Zhao LP (1994) Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 89(427):846–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR (1987) Sensitivity analysis for certain permutation inferences in matched observational studies. Biometrika 74(1):13–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P (2002a) Observational Studies, Springer Series in Statistics (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR (2002b) Attributing effects to treatment in matched observational studies. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 97(457):183–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983a) Assessing sensitivity to an unobserved binary covariate in an observational study with binary outcome. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B Methodological 45(2):212–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983b) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schick A (1986) On asymptotically efficient estimation in semiparametric models. Ann. Statist. 14(3):1139–1151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen X, Wong WH (1994) Convergence rate of sieve estimates. Ann. Statist. 22(2):580–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Si N, Zhang F, Zhou Z, Blanchet J (2023) Distributional robust batch contextual bandits. Management Sci. 69(10):5772–5793.Google Scholar
• Simonoff JS (2012) Smoothing Methods in Statistics (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
• Stone CJ (1982) Optimal global rates of convergence for nonparametric regression. Ann. Statist. 10(4):1040–1053.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan Z (2006) A distributional approach for causal inference using propensity scores. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 101(476):1619–1637.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Vaart AW (2000) Asymptotic Statistics, vol. 3 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE, Haberland M, Reddy T, Cournapeau D, Burovski E, et al. (2020) SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nature Methods 17(3):261–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman L (2006) All of Nonparametric Statistics (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
• Watson GS (1964) Smooth regression analysis. Sankhyā 26(4):359–372.Google Scholar
• Yadlowsky S, Namkoong H, Basu S, Duchi J, Tian L (2022) Bounds on the conditional and average treatment effect with unobserved confounding factors. Ann. Statist. 50(5):2587.Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zhao Q (2022) Sharp bounds and semiparametric inference in l∞-and l2-sensitivity analysis for observational studies. Preprint, submitted November 9, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.04697.Google Scholar
• Zhao Q, Small DS, Bhattacharya BB (2019) Sensitivity analysis for inverse probability weighting estimators via the percentile bootstrap. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. B: Statist. Methodology 81(4):735–761.Google Scholar
• Zheng W, Laan MJ (2011) Cross-validated targeted minimum-loss-based estimation. van der Laan MJ, Rose S, eds. Targeted Learning, Springer Series in Statistics (Springer, New York), 459–474.Crossref, Google Scholar