A Short and General Duality Proof for Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization
Published Online:15 Jul 2024https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2023.0135
References
- (2006) Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide (Springer Science & Business Media, Boston).Google Scholar
- (2000) Functions of Bounded Variation and Free Discontinuity Problems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Set-Valued Analysis (Springer Science & Business Media, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Stochastic Optimal Control: The Discrete-Time Case, vol. 5 (Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA).Google Scholar
- (2019) Quantifying distributional model risk via optimal transport. Math. Oper. Res. 44(2):565–600.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Statistical analysis of Wasserstein distributionally robust estimators. Tutorials in Operations Research: Emerging Optimization Methods and Modeling Techniques with Applications (INFORMS), 227–254.Link, Google Scholar
- (1977) Measurable multifunctions. Convex Analysis and Measurable Multifunctions (Springer, Berlin), 59–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) On approximations of data-driven chance constrained programs over Wasserstein balls. Oper. Res. Lett. 51(3):226–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Föllmer H, Schied A (2010) Convex and coherent riskmeasures. Encyclopedia of Quantitative Finance, 355–363.Google Scholar
- (2023) Distributionally robust stochastic optimization with Wasserstein distance. Math. Oper. Res. 48(2):603–655.Link, Google Scholar
- (1997) Foundations of Modern Probability, vol. 2 (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
- (2019) Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization: Theory and applications in machine learning. Operations Research & Management Science in the Age of Analytics (INFORMS, Catonsville, MD), 130–166.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) Globalized distributionally robust counterpart. INFORMS J. Comput. 35(5):1120–1142.Link, Google Scholar
- (1997) Optimization by Vector Space Methods (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
- (2018) Data-driven distributionally robust optimization using the Wasserstein metric: Performance guarantees and tractable reformulations. Math. Programming 171(1–2):115–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1970) Convex Analysis, Number 28 in Princeton Mathematical Series (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
- Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value at-risk. J. Risk 2:21–42.Google Scholar
- (2009) Variational Analysis, vol. 317 (Springer Science & Business Media, Boston).Google Scholar
- (2001) On duality theory of conic linear problems. Semi-Infinite Programming (Springer, Berlin), 135–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Interchangeability principle and dynamic equations in risk averse stochastic programming. Oper. Res. Lett. 45(4):377–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory (SIAM, Philadelphia).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1979) Universally measurable policies in dynamic programming. Math. Oper. Res. 4(1):15–30.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Certifying some distributional robustness with principled adversarial training. Proc. Internat. Conf. Learn. Representations (ICLR, Appleton, WI).Google Scholar
- (2022) Reliable off-policy evaluation for reinforcement learning. Oper. Res. 72(2):699–716.Google Scholar
- (2021) On distributionally robust chance constrained programs with Wasserstein distance. Math. Programming 186(1):115–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) A convex optimization approach to distributionally robust Markov decision processes with Wasserstein distance. IEEE Control Systems Lett. 1(1):164–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Wasserstein Regularization for 0-1 Loss (Optimization Online).Google Scholar
- (2018) Data-driven risk-averse stochastic optimization with Wasserstein metric. Oper. Res. Lett. 46(2):262–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) A unified theory of robust and distributionally robust optimization via the primal-worst-equals-dual-best principle. Oper. Res., ePub ahead of print September 26, https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2021.0268.Google Scholar

