When Market Incompleteness Is Preferable to Market Power: Insights from Power Markets

References

• Abada I, Ehrenmann A (2018) A new game theoretical approach for modeling export energy markets equilibria. Energy J. 39(5):55–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abada I, de Maere D Aertrycke G, Smeers Y (2017a) On the multiplicity of solutions in generation capacity investment models with incomplete markets: A risk-averse stochastic equilibrium approach. Math. Programming 165(1):5–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abada I, Ehrenmann A, Smeers Y (2017b) Modeling gas markets with endogenous long-term contracts. Oper. Res. 65:856–877.Link, Google Scholar
• Abada I, de Maere d’Aertrycke G, Ehrenmann A, Smeers Y (2019) What models tell us about long-term contracts in times of the energy transition. Econom. Energy Environment. Policy 8(1):163–182.Google Scholar
• Adelman D, Uçkun C (2019) Dynamic electricity pricing to smart homes. Oper. Res. 67(6):1520–1542.Link, Google Scholar
• Allaz B, Vila J-L (1993) Cournot competition, forward markets and efficiency. J. Econom. Theory 59:1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreis L, Flora M, Fontini F, Vargiolu T (2020) Pricing reliability options under different electricity price regimes. Energy Econom. 87:104705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldick R, Grant R, Kahn E (2004) Theory and application of linear supply function equilibrium in electricity markets. J. Regulatory Econom. 25:143–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barthélemy J, Quélin BV (2006) Complexity of outsourcing contracts and ex post transaction costs: An empirical investigation. J. Management Stud. 43(8):1775–1797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bask M, Lundgren J, Rudholm N (2011) Market power in the expanding Nordic power market. Appl. Econom. 43(9):1035–1043.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Behrangrad M (2015) A review of demand-side management business models in the electricity market. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 47:270–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergaentzlé C, Clastres C, Khalfallah H (2014) Demand-side management and European environmental and energy goals: An optimal complementary approach. Energy Policy 67:858–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bichuch M, Hobbs BF, Song X (2023) Identifying optimal capacity expansion and differentiated capacity payments under risk aversion and market power: A financial Stackelberg game approach. Energy Econom. 120:106567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Billimoria F, Mays J, Poudineh R (2025) Hedging and tail risk in electricity markets. Energy Econom. 141:108132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borenstein S, Bushnell J, Knittel CR (1999) Market power in electricity markets: Beyond concentration measures. Energy J. 20:10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardell JB, Hitt CC, Hogan WW (1997) Market power and strategic interaction in electricity networks. Resources Energy Econom. 19:109–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cochrane JH (2009) Asset Pricing: Revised Edition (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Cramton P (2017) Electricity market design. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 33(4):589–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramton P, Ockenfels A, Stoft S (2013) Capacity market fundamentals. Econom. Energy Environment. Policy 2(2):27–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• CRE (2022) Comission de régulation de l’énergie. Accessed September 11, 2025, https://www.cre.fr/.Google Scholar
• de Maere D Aertrycke G, Smeers Y (2013) Liquidity risks on power exchanges: A generalized Nash equilibrium model. Math. Programming 140:381–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Maere D Aertrycke G, Ehrenmann A, Smeers Y (2017a) Investment with incomplete markets for risk: The need for long-term contracts. Energy Policy 105:571–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Maere d’Aertrycke G, Ehrenmann A, Ralph D, Smeers Y (2017b) Risk trading in capacity equilibrium models. Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
• Devine MT, Siddiqui S (2023) Strategic investment decisions in an oligopoly with a competitive fringe: An equilibrium problem with equilibrium constraints approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 306(3):1473–1494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downward A, Young D, Zakeri G (2012) Electricity contracting and policy choices under risk-aversion. Oper. Res. 143.Google Scholar
• Egging R, Holz F (2016) Risks in global natural gas markets: Investment, hedging and trade. Energy Policy 94:468–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Egging R, Pichler A, Kalvø ØI, Walle–Hansen TM (2017) Risk aversion in imperfect natural gas markets. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 259:367–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Egging-Bratseth R, Siddiqui AS (2023) Stochastic equilibria with capacity expansion: Increasing expected profit with risk aversion. Decision Analytics J. 7:100234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrenmann A (2004) Equilibrium problems with equilibrium constraints and their application to electricity markets. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
• Ehrenmann A, Smeers Y (2011a) Stochastic Equilibrium Models for Generation Capacity Expansion (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrenmann A, Smeers Y (2011b) Generation capacity expansion in a risky environment: A stochastic equilibrium analysis. Oper. Res. 59:1332–1346.Link, Google Scholar
• Ehrenmann A, Smeers Y (2013) Risk adjusted discounted cash flows in capacity expansion models. Math. Programming 140:267–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferris M, Philpott A (2022) Dynamic risked equilibrium. Oper. Res. 70(3):1933–1952.Link, Google Scholar
• Finon D (2008) Investment risk allocation in decentralised electricity markets. The need of long-term contracts and vertical integration. OPEC Energy Rev. 32:150–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gérard H, Leclère V, Philpott A (2018) On risk averse competitive equilibrium. Oper. Res. Lett. 46(1):19–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graf C, Wozabal D (2013) Measuring competitiveness of the EPEX spot market for electricity. Energy Policy 62:948–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogan WW (2013) Electricity scarcity pricing through operating reserves. Econom. Energy Environment. Policy 2(2):65–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmberg P, Newbery D (2010) The supply function equilibrium and its policy implications for wholesale electricity auctions. Utility Policy 18:209–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hulshof D, van der Maat J-P, Mulder M (2016) Market fundamentals, competition and natural-gas prices. Energy Policy 94:480–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joskow PL (2006) Competitive electricity markets and investment in new generating capacity. Working Paper No. 06-14, AEI-Brookings Joint Center, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Kaminski S, Dolanyi M, Bruninx K, Delarue E (2022) Comparative analysis of risk-aversion and strategic investment behavior in generation expansion. Electric Power Systems Res. 210:108082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lise W, Hobbs BF, Hers S (2008) Market power in the European electricity marketing: The impacts of dry weather and additional transmission capacity. Energy Policy 36(4):1331–1343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magill M, Quinzii M (2002) Theory of Incomplete Markets, vol. 1 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Markowitz H (2014) Mean–variance approximations to expected utility. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 234(2):346–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massol O, Banal-Estañol A (2018) Market power and spatial arbitrage between interconnected gas hubs. Energy J. 39(2_suppl):67–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muthoo A (1999) Bargaining Theory with Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neuhoff K, Barquin J, Boots MG, Ehrenmann A, Hobbs BF, Rijkers FA, Zquez MVÃ (2005) Network-constrained Cournot models of liberalized electricity markets: The devil is in the details. Energy Econom. 27:495–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newbery DM (1995) Power markets and market power. Energy J. 16(3):39–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newbery D (2016) Missing money and missing markets: Reliability, capacity auctions and interconnectors. Energy Policy 94:401–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newbery DM, Greve T (2017) The strategic robustness of oligopoly electricity market models. Energy Econom. 68:124–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newbery D, Strbac G, Viehoff I (2016) The benefits of integrating European electricity markets. Energy Policy 94:253–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newbery D, Pollitt MG, Ritz RA, Strielkowski W (2018) Market design for a high-renewables European electricity system. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 91:695–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oren SS (2005) Generation adequacy via call options obligations: Safe passage to the promised land. Electricity J. 18:28–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Philpott A, Ferris M, Wets R (2016) Equilibrium, uncertainty and risk in hydro-thermal electricity systems. Math. Programming 157:483–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ralph D, Smeers Y (2011) Pricing risk under risk measures: An introduction to stochastic-endogenous equilibria. Technical report, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
• Ralph D, Smeers Y (2015) Risk trading and endogenous probabilities in investment equilibria. SIAM J. Optim. 25:2589–2611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2:21–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2013) The fundamental risk quadrangle in risk management, optimization and statistical estimation. Surveys Oper. Res. Management Sci. 18(1–2):33–53.Google Scholar
• RTE (2022) Bilan electrique 2022. https://www.rte-france.com.Google Scholar
• Ruiz C, Conejo A, GarcÃa-Bertrand R (2008) Some analytical results pertaining to Cournot models for short-term electricity markets. Electric Power Systems Res. 78(10):1672–1678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seggie SH (2012) Transaction cost economics in international marketing: A review and suggestions for the future. J. Internat. Marketing 20(2):49–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siddiqui S, Gabriel SA (2017) Modeling market power in the U.S. shale gas market. Optim. Engrg. 18:203–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su C-L (2005) Equilibrium Problems with Equilibrium Constraints: Stationarities, Algorithms, and Applications (Stanford University, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Tangerås TP, Mauritzen J (2018) Real-time versus day-ahead market power in a hydro-based electricity market. J. Industrial Econom. 66(4):904–941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolak FA (2003) Measuring unilateral market power in wholesale electricity markets: The California market, 1998–2000. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(2):425–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu M, Hong SH (2017) Incentive-based demand response considering hierarchical electricity market: A Stackelberg game approach. Appl. Energy 203:267–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Li L, Zhou K, Zhang X, Yang S (2018) A meta-analysis on the price elasticity and income elasticity of residential electricity demand. J. Clean Production 201:169–177.Crossref, Google Scholar