Local Cost Synergies in Reverse Auctions: An Application to Road Salt Procurement

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2023.0337

References

  • Aguirregabiria V (2008) Comment: Identification of a simple dynamic discrete game under rationalizability. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 26(3):283–289.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aguirregabiria V, Magesan A (2020) Identification and estimation of dynamic games when players’ beliefs are not in equilibrium. Rev. Econom. Stud. 87(2):582–625.Google Scholar
  • Akşin Z, Ata B, Emadi SM, Su C-L (2017) Impact of delay announcements in call centers: An empirical approach. Oper. Res. 65(1):242–265.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Allon G, Federgruen A, Pierson M (2011) How much is a reduction of your customers’ wait worth? An empirical study of the fast-food drive-thru industry based on structural estimation methods. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(4):489–507.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aradillas-Lopez A, Tamer E (2008) The identification power of equilibrium in simple games. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 26(3):261–283.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asker J, Cantillon E (2008) Properties of scoring auctions. Rand J. Econom. 39(1):69–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Athey S, Coey D, Levin J (2013) Set-asides and subsidies in auctions. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 5(1):1–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Athey S, Levin J, Seira E (2011) Comparing open and sealed bid auctions: Evidence from timber auctions. Quart. J. Econom. 126(1):207–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacharya V, Ordin A, Roberts JW (2022) Bidding and drilling under uncertainty: An empirical analysis of contingent payment auctions. J. Political Econom. 130(5):1319–1363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bray RL, Stamatopoulos I (2021) Menu costs and the bullwhip effect: Supply chain implications of dynamic pricing. Oper. Res. 70(2):748–765.Google Scholar
  • Bray RL, Yao Y, Duan Y, Huo J (2019) Ration gaming and the bullwhip effect. Oper. Res. 67(2):453–467.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Cantillon E, Pesendorfer M (2007) Combination bidding in multi-unit auctions. Working paper, FNRS, ECARES (Université Libre de Bruxelles) and CEPR, London.Google Scholar
  • Chassang S, Kawai K, Nakabayashi J, Ortner JM (2019) Data driven regulation: Theory and application to missing bids. NBER Working Paper No. 22952, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Che Y-K (1993) Design competition through multidimensional auctions. Rand J. Econom. 24(4):668–680.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Compiani G, Haile P, Sant’Anna M (2020) Common values, unobserved heterogeneity, and endogenous entry in us offshore oil lease auctions. J. Political Econom. 128(10):3872–3912.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Covert TR, Sweeney RL (2023) Relinquishing riches: Auctions versus informal negotiations in Texas oil and gas leasing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 113(3):628–663.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Silva DG (2005) Synergies in recurring procurement auctions: An empirical investigation. Econom. Inquiry 43(1):55–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emadi SM, Swaminathan JM (2018) Customer learning in call centers from previous waiting experiences. Oper. Res. 66(5):1433–1456.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erkan H, Stamatopoulos I, Agarwal A, Muthuraman K (2022) Why so many scooters? A policy analysis. Preprint, submitted May 17, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4101460.Google Scholar
  • Esö P, White L (2004) Precautionary bidding in auctions. Econometrica 72(1):77–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fibich G, Gavish N (2011) Numerical simulations of asymmetric first-price auctions. Games Econom. Behav. 73(2):479–495.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fibich G, Gavish N (2012) Asymmetric first-price auctions—A dynamical-systems approach. Math. Oper. Res. 37(2):219–243.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gentry ML, Komarova T, Schiraldi P (2020) Preferences and performance in simultaneous first-price auctions: A structural analysis. Preprint, submitted March 3, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2514995.Google Scholar
  • Guerre E, Perrigne I, Vuong Q (2000) Optimal nonparametric estimation of first-price auctions. Econometrica 68(3):525–574.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta D, Snir EM, Chen Y (2015) Contractors’ and agency decisions and policy implications in A+ B bidding. Production Oper. Management 24(1):159–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hendricks K, Pinkse J, Porter RH (2003) Empirical implications of equilibrium bidding in first-price, symmetric, common value auctions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 70(1):115–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hubbard TP, Paarsch HJ (2009) Investigating bid preferences at low-price, sealed-bid auctions with endogenous participation. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 27(1):1–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hubbard TP, Kirkegaard R, Paarsch HJ (2013) Using economic theory to guide numerical analysis: Solving for equilibria in models of asymmetric first-price auctions. Comput. Econom. 42:241–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kabra A, Belavina E, Girotra K (2019) Bike-share systems: Accessibility and availability. Management Sci. 66(9):3803–3824.Google Scholar
  • Kim SW, Olivares M, Weintraub GY (2014) Measuring the performance of large-scale combinatorial auctions: A structural estimation approach. Management Sci. 60(5):1180–1201.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kong Y (2021) Sequential auctions with synergy and affiliation across auctions. J. Political Econom. 129(1):148–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kong Y, Perrigne I, Vuong Q (2022) Multidimensional auctions of contracts: An empirical analysis. Amer. Econom. Rev. 112(5):1703–1736.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krasnokutskaya E, Seim K (2011) Bid preference programs and participation in highway procurement auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2653–2686.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li J, Granados N, Netessine S (2014) Are consumers strategic? Structural estimation from the air-travel industry. Management Sci. 60(9):2114–2137.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lu J, Perrigne I (2008) Estimating risk aversion from ascending and sealed-bid auctions: The case of timber auction data. J. Appl. Econometrics 23(7):871–896.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marion J (2007) Are bid preferences benign? The effect of small business subsidies in highway procurement auctions. J. Public Econom. 91(7–8):1591–1624.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee RP, McMillan J (1989) Government procurement and international trade. J. Internat. Econom. 26(3–4):291–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Musalem A, Olivares M, Bradlow ET, Terwiesch C, Corsten D (2010) Structural estimation of the effect of out-of-stocks. Management Sci. 56(7):1180–1197.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Myerson RB (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Olivares M, Terwiesch C, Cassorla L (2008) Structural estimation of the newsvendor model: An application to reserving operating room time. Management Sci. 54(1):41–55.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shen Y, Chan C, Zheng F, Escobar GJ (2020) Structural estimation of intertemporal externalities with application in ICU admissions. Preprint, submitted April 24, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3564776.Google Scholar
  • Tsay AA (1999) The quantity flexibility contract and supplier-customer incentives. Management Sci. 45(10):1339–1358.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tsay AA, Lovejoy WS (1999) Quantity flexibility contracts and supply chain performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 1(2):89–111.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zheng F, He P, Belavina E, Girotra K (2020) Customer preference and station network in the London bike share system. Management Sci. 67(3):1392–1412.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.