Ranking and Contextual Selection
References
- (2019) MNL-bandit: A dynamic learning approach to assortment selection. Oper. Res. 67(5):1453–1485.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Expected value of information methods for contextual ranking and selection: Clinical trials and simulation optimization. Kim S, Feng B, Smith K, Masoud S, Zheng Z, eds. Proc. 2021 Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1–12.Google Scholar
- (2022) Janos: An integrated predictive and prescriptive modeling framework. INFORMS J. Comput. 34(2):807–816.Link, Google Scholar
- Bouneffouf D, Rish I, Aggarwal C (2020) Survey on applications of multi-armed and contextual bandits. 2020 IEEE Congress Evolutionary Comput. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1–8.Google Scholar
- (2021) Contextual ranking and selection with Gaussian processes. Kim S, Feng B, Smith K, Masoud S, Zheng Z, eds. Proc. 2021 Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1–12.Google Scholar
- Chen CH, Lee LH (2011) Stochastic Simulation Optimization: An Optimal Computing Budget Allocation, vol. 1 (World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ).Google Scholar
- (2020) Dynamic assortment optimization with changing contextual information. J. Machine Learn. Res. 21(1):8918–8961.Google Scholar
- (2022) A statistical learning approach to personalization in revenue management. Management Sci. 68(3):1923–1937.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Knowledge gradient for selection with covariates: Consistency and computation. Naval Res. Logist. 69(3):496–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) A contextual ranking and selection method for personalized medicine. Preprint, submitted June 25, https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.12640.Google Scholar
- (2018) Guarantees on the probability of good selection. Rabe M, Juan AA, Mustafee N, Skoogh A, Jian S, Johansson B, eds. Proc. 2018 Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 351–365.Google Scholar
- (2022) Smart “predict, then optimize”. Management Sci. 68(1):9–26.Link, Google Scholar
- Gao S, Du J, Chen CH (2019) Selecting the optimal system design under covariates. Reveliotis S, Capalleri D, Dimarogonas D, Dotoli M, Fanti M, Lutz P, Seatzu C, Xie X, eds. Proc. 15th Internat. Conf. Automation Sci. Engrg. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 547–552.Google Scholar
- Hunter SR, Nelson BL (2017) Parallel ranking and selection. Tolk A, Fowler J, Shao G, Yücesan E, eds. Adv. Modeling Simulation: Seminal Research 50 Years Winter Simulation Conf. (Springer, New York), 249–275.Google Scholar
- (2020) Dynamic assortment personalization in high dimensions. Oper. Res. 68(4):1020–1037.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) A classification method for ranking and selection with covariates. Feng B, Yijie P, Pedrielli G, Eunhye S, Shashaani S, Corlu CG, eds. Proc. 2022 Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1–12.Google Scholar
- (2001) A fully sequential procedure for indifference-zone selection in simulation. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simulation 11(3):251–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Efficient learning for clustering and optimizing context-dependent designs. Oper. Res. 72(2):617–638.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Data-driven ranking and selection: High-dimensional covariates and general dependence. Rabe M, Juan AA, Mustafee N, Skoogh A, Jian S, Johansson B, eds. Proc. 2018 Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1933–1944.Google Scholar
- (2020) Context-dependent ranking and selection under a Bayesian framework. Bae KHG, Feng B, Kim S, Lazarova-Molnar S, Zheng Z, Roeder T, Thiesing R, eds. Proc. 2020 Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 2060–2070.Google Scholar
- (2022) Offline sequential learning via simulation. IISE Trans. 54(11):1019–1032.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Revenue management and the rise of the algorithmic economy. Management Sci. 67(9):5389–5398.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Online personalized assortment optimization with high-dimensional customer contextual data. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(5):2741–2760.Link, Google Scholar
- (1995) Using common random numbers for indifference-zone selection and multiple comparisons in simulation. Management Sci. 41(12):1935–1945.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) A multi-fidelity modelling approach for airline disruption management using simulation. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 73(10):2228–2241.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Dynamic assortment optimization with a multinomial logit choice model and capacity constraint. Oper. Res. 58(6):1666–1680.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) On the convergence rates of expected improvement methods. Oper. Res. 64(6):1515–1528.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Optimal dynamic assortment planning with demand learning. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(3):387–404.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Ranking and selection with covariates for personalized decision making. INFORMS J. Comput. 33(4):1500–1519.Abstract, Google Scholar
- Vovk V, Gammerman A, Shafer G (2005) Algorithmic Learning in a Random World, vol. 29 (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
- Wilder B, Ewing E, Dilkina B, Tambe M (2019) End to end learning and optimization on graphs. Wallach H, Larochelle H, Beygelzimer A, d’Alch’e-Buc F, Fox E, Garnett R, eds. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems, vol. 32 (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY), 4674–4685.Google Scholar
- (2023) Efficient learning for selecting top-m context-dependent designs. Preprint, submitted May 6, https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.04086.Google Scholar
- (2018) Fully sequential ranking and selection procedures with PAC guarantee. Rabe M, Juan AA, Mustafee N, Skoogh A, Jian S, Johansson B, eds. Proc. 2018 Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1898–1908.Google Scholar

