Pricing Optimal Outcomes in Coupled and Non-Convex Markets: Theory and Applications to Electricity Markets

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2023.0401

References

  • Andrianesis P, Bertsimas DJ, Caramanis M, Hogan W (2021) Computation of convex hull prices in electricity markets with non-convexities using Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 37(4):2578–2589.Google Scholar
  • Arrow KJ, Debreu G (1954) Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica 22(3):265–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin E, Klemperer P (2019) Understanding preferences: Demand types, and the existence of equilibrium with indivisibilities. Econometrica 87(3):867–932.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bichler M, Goeree JK (2017) Handbook of Spectrum Auction Design (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bichler M, Waldherr S (2017) Core and pricing equilibria in combinatorial exchanges. Econom. Lett. 157:145–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bichler M, Waldherr S (2019) Computing core-stable outcomes in combinatorial exchanges with financially constrained bidders. Karlin AR, Immorlica N, Johari R, eds. Proc. ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 747.Google Scholar
  • Bichler M, Fichtl M, Schwarz G (2020) Walrasian equilibria from an optimization perspective: A guide to the literature. Naval Res. Logist. 68(4):496–513.Google Scholar
  • Bichler M, Knoerr J, Maldonado F (2022) Pricing in non-convex markets: How to price electricity in the presence of demand response. Inform. Systems. Res. 34(2):652–675.Google Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S, Mamer JW (1997) Competitive equilibrium in an exchange economy with indivisibilities. J. Econom. Theory 74(2):385–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S, Ostroy JM (2002) The package assignment model. J. Econom. Theory 107(2):377–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blumrosen L, Nisan N (2007) Combinatorial auctions. Algorithmic Game Theory 267:300.Google Scholar
  • Byers C, Hug G (2023) Long-run optimal pricing in electricity markets with non-convex costs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 307(1):351–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cho J, Papavasiliou A (2022) Pricing under uncertainty in multi-interval real-time markets. Oper. Res. 71(6):1928–1942.Google Scholar
  • Cramton PC, Shoham Y, Steinberg R (2006) Combinatorial Auctions, vol. 475 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Deb K (2001) Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms (Wiley, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
  • Eldridge B, O’Neill RP, Castillo A (2017) Marginal loss calculations for the DCOPF. Technical report, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Emmerich MTM, Deutz AH (2018) A tutorial on multiobjective optimization: Fundamentals and evolutionary methods. Natural Comput. 17(3):585–609.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Falk JE (1969) Lagrange multipliers and nonconvex programs. SIAM J. Control 7(4):534–545.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • FERC (2020) Energy price formation. Accessed February 16, 2023, https://www.ferc.gov/industries-data/electric/electric-power-markets/energy-price-formation.Google Scholar
  • Frank S, Steponavice I, Rebennack S (2012) Optimal power flow: A bibliographic survey I. Energy Systems 3(3):221–258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goffin JL, Vial JP (2002) Convex nondifferentiable optimization: A survey focused on the analytic center cutting plane method. Optim. Methods Software 17(5):805–867.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gribik PR, Hogan WW, Pope SL (2007) Market-clearing electricity prices and energy uplift. Working paper, Harvard Electricity Policy Group, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Gul F, Stacchetti E (1999) Walrasian equilibrium with gross substitutes. J. Econom. Theory 87:95–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herrero I, Rodilla P, Batlle C (2015) Electricity market-clearing prices and investment incentives: The role of pricing rules. Energy Econom. 47:42–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herrero I, Rodilla P, Batlle C (2020) Evolving bidding formats and pricing schemes in USA and Europe day-ahead electricity markets. Energies 13(19):5020.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hobbs BF, Rothkopf MH, O’Neill RP, Chao Hp (2001) The Next Generation of Electric Power Unit Commitment Models, vol. 36 (Springer, Boston).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogan WW, Ring BJ (2003) On Minimum-Uplift Pricing for Electricity Markets (Harvard Electricity Policy Group, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Hua B, Baldick R (2017) A convex primal formulation for convex hull pricing. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 32(5):3814–3823.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ito N, Takeda A, Namerikawa T (2013) Convex hull pricing for demand response in electricity markets. Hauser C, Lampe L, Morison K, eds. Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. Smart Grid Comm. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 151–156.Google Scholar
  • Kelso AS, Crawford VP (1982) Job matching, coalition formation, and gross substitute. Econometrica 50:1483–1504.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knueven B, Ostrowski J, Castillo A, Watson JP (2022) A computationally efficient algorithm for computing convex hull prices. Comput. Industrial Engrg. 163:107806.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuang X, Lamadrid AJ, Zuluaga LF (2019) Pricing in non-convex markets with quadratic deliverability costs. Energy Econom. 80:123–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liberopoulos G, Andrianesis P (2016) Critical review of pricing schemes in markets with non-convex costs. Oper. Res. 64(1):17–31.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miettinen K (2012) Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization, vol. 12 (Springer Science & Business Media, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Milgrom P (2017) Discovering Prices (Columbia University Press, Columbia, NY).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MISO (2019) ELMP III white paper I R&D report and design recommendation on short-term enhancements. Accessed August 8, 2022, https://www.misoenergy.org/stakeholder-engagement/stakeholder-feedback/msc-elmp-iii-whitepaper-20190117/.Google Scholar
  • Molzahn DK, Hiskens IA (2019) A survey of relaxations and approximations of the power flow equations. Foundations Trends Electric Energy Systems 4(1–2):1–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • NEMO Committee (2019) EUPHEMIA public description: Single price coupling algorithm. Accessed February 5, 2023, https://www.epexspot.com/document/40503/Euphemia%20Public%20Description.Google Scholar
  • O’Neill RP, Sotkiewicz PM, Hobbs BF, Rothkopf MH, Stewart WR (2005) Efficient market-clearing prices in markets with nonconvexities. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1(164):269–285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Neill R, Hytowitz RB, Whitman P, Mead D, Dautel T, Chen Y, Eldridge B, et al. (2019) Essays on average incremental cost pricing for independent system operators. Accessed July 23, 2023, https://optimization-online.org/2023/07/essays-on-average-incremental-cost-pricing-for-independent-system-operators/.Google Scholar
  • Papavasiliou A, Oren SS (2014) Large-scale integration of deferrable demand and renewable energy sources. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 29(1):489–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schiro DA, Zheng T, Zhao F, Litvinov E (2016) Convex hull pricing in electricity markets: Formulation, analysis, and implementation challenges. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 31(5):4068–4075.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stevens N, Papavasiliou A (2022) Application of the level method for computing locational convex hull prices. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 37(5):3958–3968.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tian J, Yu L, Xue R, Zhuang S, Shan Y (2022) Global low-carbon energy transition in the post-COVID-19 era. Appl. Energy 307:118205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang C, Peng T, Luh PB, Gribik P, Zhang L (2013a) The subgradient simplex cutting plane method for extended locational marginal prices. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 28(3):2758–2767.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang G, Shanbhag UV, Zheng T, Litvinov E, Meyn S (2013b) An extreme-point subdifferential method for convex hull pricing in energy and reserve markets—Part I: Algorithm structure. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 28(3):2111–2120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang Z, Zheng T, Yu J, Xie K (2019) A unified approach to pricing under nonconvexity. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 34(5):3417–3427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu Y, Guan Y, Chen Y (2020) An extended integral unit commitment formulation and an iterative algorithm for convex hull pricing. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 35(6):4335–4346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.