Technical Note–Dynamic Duopolistic Competition with Sticky Prices

References

• Arnosti N, Weinberg SM (2022) Bitcoin: A natural oligopoly. Management Sci. 68(7):4755–4771.Link, Google Scholar
• Back K, Paulsen D (2009) Open-loop equilibria and perfect competition in option exercise games. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(11):4531–4552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergin J, MacLeod WB (1993) Continuous time repeated games. Internat. Econom. Rev. 34(1):21–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernhardt D, Hughson E (1997) Splitting orders. Rev. Financial Stud. 10(1):69–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertsekas D (2012) Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, vol. I (Athena Scientific, Nashua, NH).Google Scholar
• Borenstein S (2005) The long-run efficiency of real-time electricity pricing. Energy J. 26(3):93–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borenstein S, Holland S (2005) On the efficiency of competitive electricity markets with time-invariant retail prices. RAND J. Econom. 36(3):469–494.Google Scholar
• Brown DB, Smith JE (2011) Dynamic portfolio optimization with transaction costs: Heuristics and dual bounds. Management Sci. 57(10):1752–1770.Link, Google Scholar
• Bruce NI, Krishnamoorthy A, Prasad A (2022) Advertising cycling to manage exclusivity loss in fashion styles. Oper. Res. 70(6):3125–3142.Link, Google Scholar
• Buss A, Dumas B (2019) The dynamic properties of financial-market equilibrium with trading fees. J. Finance 74(2):795–844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cellini R, Lambertini L (2004) Dynamic oligopoly with sticky prices: Closed-loop, feedback, and open-loop solutions. J. Dynam. Control Systems 10:303–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chau M, Vayanos D (2008) Strong-form efficiency with monopolistic insiders. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(5):2275–2306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK, Rao VR (1996) Pricing strategies in a dynamic duopoly: A differential game model. Management Sci. 42(11):1501–1514.Link, Google Scholar
• Cho IK, Meyn SP (2010) Efficiency and marginal cost pricing in dynamic competitive markets with friction. Theoret. Econom. 5(2):215–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colombo L, Labrecciosa P (2013) On the convergence to the Cournot equilibrium in a productive asset oligopoly. J. Math. Econom. 49(6):441–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Constantinides GM (1986) Capital market equilibrium with transaction costs. J. Political Econom. 94(4):842–862.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis MH, Norman AR (1990) Portfolio selection with transaction costs. Math. Oper. Res. 15(4):676–713.Link, Google Scholar
• Deal KR (1979) Optimizing advertising expenditures in a dynamic duopoly. Oper. Res. 27(4):682–692.Link, Google Scholar
• Dockner EJ (1992) A dynamic theory of conjectural variations. J. Indust. Econom. 40(4):377–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dockner EJ, Jorgensen S, Van Long N, Sorger G (2000) Differential Games in Economics and Management Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Driskill RA, McCafferty S (1989) Dynamic duopoly with adjustment costs: A differential game approach. J. Econom. Theory 49(2):324–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engwerda J (2005) LQ Dynamic Optimization and Differential Games (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Erickson GM (1985) A model of advertising competition. J. Marketing Res. 22(3):297–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erickson GM (1992) Empirical analysis of closed-loop duopoly advertising strategies. Management Sci. 38(12):1732–1749.Link, Google Scholar
• Erickson GM (2009) Advertising competition in a dynamic oligopoly with multiple brands. Oper. Res. 57(5):1106–1113.Link, Google Scholar
• Feichtinger G, Hartl RF, Sethi SP (1994) Dynamic optimal control models in advertising: Recent developments. Management Sci. 40(2):195–226.Link, Google Scholar
• Fershtman C, Kamien MI (1987) Dynamic duopolistic competition with sticky prices. Econometrica 55(5):1151–1164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fershtman C, Kamien MI (1990) Turnpike properties in a finite-horizon differential game: Dynamic duopoly with sticky prices. Internat. Econom. Rev. 31(1):49–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fruchter GE, Kalish S (1997) Closed-loop advertising strategies in a duopoly. Management Sci. 43(1):54–63.Link, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Levine D (1986) Limit games and limit equilibria. J. Econom. Theory 38(2):261–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaimon C (1989) Dynamic game results of the acquisition of new technology. Oper. Res. 37(3):410–425.Link, Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ, Stiglitz JE (1980) On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 70(3):393–408.Google Scholar
• Guo M, Ou-Yang H (2015) Feedback trading between fundamental and nonfundamental information. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(1):247–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaenko S (2023) Transaction costs, frequent trading, and stock prices. J. Financial Markets 64:100775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamien MI, Schwartz NL (2012) Dynamic Optimization: The Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control in Economics and Management (Courier Corporation, Chelmsford, MA).Google Scholar
• Kirk DE (2004) Optimal Control Theory: An Introduction (Courier Corporation, Chelmsford, MA).Google Scholar
• Kovalenkov A, Vives X (2014) Competitive rational expectations equilibria without apology. J. Econom. Theory 149:211–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kyle AS (1985) Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica 53(6):1315–1335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambertini L (2018) Differential Games in Industrial Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee J, Kyle AS (2018) When are financial markets perfectly competitive? Working paper, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Liu H (2004) Optimal consumption and investment with transaction costs and multiple risky assets. J. Finance 59(1):289–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu H, Loewenstein M (2002) Optimal portfolio selection with transaction costs and finite horizons. Rev. Financial Stud. 15(3):805–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehlmann A (1988) Applied Differential Games (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay SK, Kouvelis P (1997) A differential game theoretic model for duopolistic competition on design quality. Oper. Res. 45(6):886–893.Link, Google Scholar
• Ou-Yang H, Wu W (2017) Net trade and market efficiency in Grossman and Stiglitz (1980). J. Econom. Theory 167:75–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piga CA (2000) Competition in a duopoly with sticky price and advertising. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 18(4):595–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reynolds SS (1987) Capacity investment, preemption and commitment in an infinite horizon model. Internat. Econom. Rev. 28(1):69–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reynolds SS (1991) Dynamic oligopoly with capacity adjustment costs. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 15(3):491–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reynolds SS (2018) Measuring market power in wholesale electricity markets: A dynamic competition approach. Working paper, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
• Shreve SE, Soner HM (1994) Optimal investment and consumption with transaction costs. Ann. Appl. Probab. 4(3):609–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon LK, Stinchcombe MB (1989) Extensive form games in continuous time: Pure strategies. Econometrica 57(5):1171–1214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorger G (1989) Competitive dynamic advertising: A modification of the case game. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 13(1):55–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsutsui S, Mino K (1990) Nonlinear strategies in dynamic duopolistic competition with sticky prices. J. Econom. Theory 52(1):136–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vives X (2014) On the possibility of informationally efficient markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 12(5):1200–1239.Crossref, Google Scholar