Application-Driven Learning: A Closed-Loop Prediction and Optimization Approach Applied to Dynamic Reserves and Demand Forecasting

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2023.0565

References

  • Amazon (2024) EC2 Amazon Web Services, AWS. Accessed March 18, 2024, https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/.Google Scholar
  • Babaeinejadsarookolaee S, Birchfield A, Christie RD, Coffrin C, DeMarco C, Diao R, Ferris M, et al. (2019) The power grid library for benchmarking ac optimal power flow algorithms. Preprint, submitted August 7, https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.02788.Google Scholar
  • Ban GY, Gallien J, Mersereau AJ (2019) Dynamic procurement of new products with covariate information: The residual tree method. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(4):798–815.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bengio Y (1997) Using a financial training criterion rather than a prediction criterion. International J. Neural Systems 8(4):433–443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Kallus N (2020) From predictive to prescriptive analytics. Management Sci. 66(3):1025–1044.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Billingsley P (1986) Probability and Measure, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Böhm V (1975) On the continuity of the optimal policy set for linear programs. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 28(2):303–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borrelli F, Bemporad A, Morari M (2003) Geometric algorithm for multiparametric linear programming. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 118(3):515–540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brockwell PJ, Davis RA (2009) Time Series: Theory and Methods (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bucksteeg M, Niesen L, Weber C (2016) Impacts of dynamic probabilistic reserve sizing techniques on reserve requirements and system costs. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 7(4):1408–1420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • CAISO (2020) 2019 Annual report on market issues and performance. Department of Market Monitoring, California Independent System Operator. Accessed March 18, 2024, http://www.caiso.com/Documents/2019AnnualReportonMarketIssuesandPerformance.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Chen Y, Gribik P, Gardner J (2013) Incorporating post zonal reserve deployment transmission constraints into energy and ancillary service co-optimization. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 29(2):537–549.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conn AR, Scheinberg K, Vicente LN (2009) Introduction to Derivative-Free Optimization (SIAM, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  • De Vos K, Stevens N, Devolder O, Papavasiliou A, Hebb B, Matthys-Donnadieu J (2019) Dynamic dimensioning approach for operating reserves: Proof of concept in Belgium. Energy Policy 124:272–285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diao S, Sen S (2024) Distribution-free algorithms for predictive stochastic programming in the presence of streaming data. Comput. Optim. Appl. 87(2):355–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dias Garcia J, Bodin G, Street A (2023) BilevelJuMP.jl: Modeling and solving bilevel optimization problems in Julia. INFORMS J. Comput. 36(2):327–335.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Domowitz I, El-Gamal MA (1993) A consistent test of stationary-ergodicity. Econometric Theory 9(4):589–601.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donti P, Amos B, Kolter JZ (2017) Task-based end-to-end model learning in stochastic optimization. Guyon I, Luxburg UV, Bengio S, Wallach H, Fergus R, Vishwanathan S, Garnett R, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30 (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY), 1–11.Google Scholar
  • EIA (2024) U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2021. Accessed March 18, 2024, https://www.eia.gov/electricity/gridmonitor/dashboard/electric_overview/balancing_authority/PJM.Google Scholar
  • Ela E, Milligan M, Kirby B (2011) Operating reserves and variable generation. Technical Report NREL/TP-5500-51978, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO. Accessed March 18, 2024, https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/51978.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Elmachtoub AN, Grigas P (2022) Smart “predict, then optimize”. Management Sci. 68(1):9–26.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fliscounakis S, Panciatici P, Capitanescu F, Wehenkel L (2013) Contingency ranking with respect to overloads in very large power systems taking into account uncertainty, preventive, and corrective actions. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 28(4):4909–4917.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fortuny-Amat J, McCarl B (1981) A representation and economic interpretation of a two-level programming problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 32(9):783–792.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gal T (1994) Postoptimal Analyses, Parametric Programming, and Related Topics: Degeneracy, Multicriteria Decision Making, Redundancy (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grigas P, Qi M, Shen ZJM (2021) Integrated conditional estimation-optimization. Preprint, submitted October 24, https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.12351.Google Scholar
  • Gurobi Optimization (2020) Gurobi optimizer reference manual. Accessed March 18, 2024, http://www.gurobi.com.Google Scholar
  • Holttinen H, Milligan M, Ela E, Menemenlis N, Dobschinski J, Rawn B, Bessa RJ, Flynn D, Gomez-Lazaro E, Detlefsen NK (2012) Methodologies to determine operating reserves due to increased wind power. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 3(4):713–723.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Josz C, Fliscounakis S, Maeght J, Panciatici P (2016) AC power flow data in MATPOWER and QCQP format: iTesla, RTE snapshots, and PEGASE. Preprint, submitted March 4, https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01533.Google Scholar
  • Kannan R, Bayraksan G, Luedtke J (2022) Data-driven sample average approximation with covariate information. Preprint, submitted July 27, https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.13554.Google Scholar
  • Kao Yh, Roy B, Yan X (2009) Directed regression. Bengio Y, Schuurmans D, Lafferty J, Williams C, Culotta A, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 22 (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY), 1–9.Google Scholar
  • Kirschen DS, Strbac G (2018) Fundamentals of Power System Economics (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Korf LA, Wets RJB (2001) Random LSC functions: An ergodic theorem. Math. Oper. Res. 26(2):421–445.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lubin M, Dowson O, Dias Garcia J, Huchette J, Legat B, Vielma JP (2023) JuMP 1.0: Recent improvements to a modeling language for mathematical optimization. Math. Programming Comput. 15(3):581–589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mandi J, Bucarey V, Tchomba MMK, Guns T (2022) Decision-focused learning: Through the lens of learning to rank. Chaudhuri K, Jegelka S, Song L, Szepesvari C, Niu G, Sabato S, eds. Proc. 39th Internat. Conf. Machine Learning, vol. 162 (PMLR, New York), 14935–14947.Google Scholar
  • Megiddo N, Chandrasekaran R (1989) On the ε-perturbation method for avoiding degeneracy. Oper. Res. Lett. 8(6):305–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mogensen PK, Riseth AN (2018) Optim: A mathematical optimization package for Julia. J. Open Source Software 3(24):615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muñoz M, Pineda S, Morales J (2022) A bilevel framework for decision-making under uncertainty with contextual information. Omega 108:102575.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nocedal J, Wright S (2006) Numerical Optimization (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
  • Papavasiliou A, Oren SS (2013) Multiarea stochastic unit commitment for high wind penetration in a transmission constrained network. Oper. Res. 61(3):578–592.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Papavasiliou A, Oren SS, Rountree B (2014) Applying high performance computing to transmission-constrained stochastic unit commitment for renewable energy integration. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 30(3):1109–1120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pereira MV, Granville S, Fampa MH, Dix R, Barroso LA (2005) Strategic bidding under uncertainty: A binary expansion approach. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 20(1):180–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • PJM (2018) PJM Manual 11: Energy and Ancillary Services Market Operations (97):200. Accessed March 18, 2024, https://pjm.com/-/media/documents/manuals/archive/m11/m11v97-energy-and-ancillary-services-market-operations-07-26-2018.ashx.Google Scholar
  • Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S, Zabarankin M (2008) Risk tuning with generalized linear regression. Math. Oper. Res. 33(3):712–729.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sadana U, Chenreddy A, Delage E, Forel A, Frejinger E, Vidal T (2023) A survey of contextual optimization methods for decision making under uncertainty. Preprint, submitted June 17, https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.10374.Google Scholar
  • Shapiro A, Xu H (2008) Stochastic mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints, modelling and sample average approximation. Optimization 57(3):395–418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro A, Dentcheva D, Ruszczyński A (2014) Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory, 2nd ed. (SIAM, Philadelphia).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siddiqui S, Gabriel SA (2013) An SOS1-based approach for solving MPECs with a natural gas market application. Networks Spatial Econom. 13(2):205–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strbac G, Shakoor A, Black M, Pudjianto D, Bopp T (2007) Impact of wind generation on the operation and development of the UK electricity systems. Electric Power Systems Res. 77(9):1214–1227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sur A, Birge J (2020) Epi-convergence of sample averages of a random lower semi-continuous functional generated by a Markov chain and application to stochastic optimization. Optimization Online (April 21), https://optimization-online.org/2020/04/7762/.Google Scholar
  • Tibshirani R (2011) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso: A retrospective. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Series B Statist. Methodol. 73(3):273–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian H (1975) A Bayesian approach to real estate assessment. Fienberg SE, Zellner A, eds. Studies in Bayesian Econometrics and Statistics in Honor of Leonard J. Savage (North-Holland Co., Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  • Wang B, Hobbs BF (2014) A flexible ramping product: Can it help real-time dispatch markets approach the stochastic dispatch ideal? Electric Power Systems Res. 109:128–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang B, Hobbs BF (2015) Real-time markets for flexiramp: A stochastic unit commitment-based analysis. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 31(2):846–860.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White H (1984) Asymptotic Theory for Econometricians (Academic Press, Orlando, FL).Google Scholar
  • Zellner A (1986a) Bayesian estimation and prediction using asymmetric loss functions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 81(394):446–451.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zellner A (1986b) Biased predictors, rationality and the evaluation of forecasts. Econom. Lett. 21(1):45–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.