Does the Prohibition of Trade-Through Hurt Liquidity Demanders?

References

• Ahn HJ, Bae KH, Chan K (2001) Limit orders, depth, and volatility: Evidence from the stock exchange of Hong Kong. J. Finance 56(2):767–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2015) RG 223 guidance on ASIC market integrity rules for competition in exchange markets. RG 223.82. Accessed April 9, 2018, http://download.asic.gov.au/media/3225864/rg223-published-4-may-2015.pdf.Google Scholar
• Battalio R, Hatch B, Jennings R (2004) Toward a national market system for US exchange–listed equity options. J. Finance 59(2):933–962.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bessembinder H (2003) Quote-based competition and trade execution costs in NYSE-listed stocks. J. Financial Econom. 70(3):385–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biais B, Hillion P, Spatt C (1995) An empirical analysis of the limit order book and the order flow in the Paris Bourse. J. Finance 50(5):1655–1689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blume ME (2007) Competition and fragmentation in the equity markets: The effect of Regulation NMS. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Chen N, Kou S, Wang C (2018) A partitioning algorithm for Markov decision processes with applications to market microstructure. Management Sci. 64(2):784–803.Link, Google Scholar
• Foucault T, Menkveld AJ (2008) Competition for order flow and smart order routing systems. J. Finance 63(1):119–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foucault T, Kadan O, Kandel E (2005) Limit order book as a market for liquidity. Rev. Financial Stud. 18(4):1171–1217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foucault T, Kadan O, Kandel E (2013) Liquidity cycles and make/take fees in electronic markets. J. Finance 68(1):299–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goettler RL, Parlour CA, Rajan U (2005) Equilibrium in a dynamic limit order market. J. Finance 60(5):2149–2192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendershott T, Jones CM (2005) Trade-through prohibitions and market quality. J. Financial Markets 8(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Rubin DB (2015) Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Large J (2007) Measuring the resiliency of an electronic limit order book. J. Financial Markets 10(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lo DK, Hall AD (2015) Resiliency of the limit order book. J. Econom. Dynamics Control 61:222–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moallemi CC, Sağlam M (2013) OR forum—The cost of latency in high-frequency trading. Oper. Res. 61(5):1070–1086.Link, Google Scholar
• Obizhaeva AA, Wang J (2013) Optimal trading strategy and supply/demand dynamics. J. Financial Markets 16(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Hara M (2004) Searching for a new center: US securities markets in transition. Econom. Rev. 89(4):37–52.Google Scholar
• O’Hara M, Ye M (2011) Is market fragmentation harming market quality? J. Financial Econom. 100(3):459–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Predoiu S, Shaikhet G, Shreve S (2011) Optimal execution in a general one-sided limit-order book. SIAM J. Financial Math. 2(1):183–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roşu I (2009) A dynamic model of the limit order book. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(11):4601–4641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin D (1976) Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63(3):581–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (2005). Regulation NMS. Release No. 34-51808, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Tsoukalas G, Wang J, Giesecke K (2019) Dynamic portfolio execution. Management Sci. 65(5):2015–2040.Abstract, Google Scholar