The Pandora’s Box Problem with Sequential Inspections

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2024.0733

References

  • Asadpour A, Nazerzadeh H (2015) Maximizing stochastic monotone submodular functions. Management Sci. 62(8):2374–2391.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Asawa M, Teneketzis D (1996) Multi-armed bandits with switching penalties. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 41(3):328–348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Attias C, Krauthgamer R, Levi R, Shaposhnik Y (2017) Stochastic selection problems with testing. Preprint, submitted December 11, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3076956.Google Scholar
  • Balseiro SR, Brown DB (2019) Approximations to stochastic dynamic programs via information relaxation duality. Oper. Res. 67(2):577–597.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Baucells M, Zorc S (2024) Search in the dark: The case with recall and gaussian learning. Oper. Res. 73(5):2572–2590.Google Scholar
  • Bertsekas D (2019) Reinforcement Learning and Optimal Control (Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA).Google Scholar
  • Bertsimas D, Nino-Mora J (1996) Conservation laws, extended polymatroids and multiarmed bandit problems; a polyhedral approach to indexable systems. Math. Oper. Res. 21(2):257–306.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beyhaghi H (2019) Approximately-optimal mechanisms in auction design, search theory, and matching markets. Unpublished PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  • Beyhaghi H, Kleinberg R (2019) Pandora’s problem with nonobligatory inspection. Proc. 2019 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 131–132.Google Scholar
  • Boodaghians S, Fusco F, Lazos P, Leonardi S (2020) Pandora’s box problem with order constraints. ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 439–458.Google Scholar
  • Brown DB, Smith JE (2013) Optimal sequential exploration: Bandits, clairvoyants, and wildcats. Oper. Res. 61(3):644–665.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Choi M, Dai AY, Kim K (2018) Consumer search and price competition. Econometrica 86(4):1257–1281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chu LY, Nazerzadeh H, Zhang H (2020) Position ranking and auctions for online marketplaces. Management Sci. 66(8):3617–3634.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clarkson J, Glazebrook KD, Lin KY (2020) Fast or slow: Search in discrete locations with two search modes. Oper. Res. 68(2):552–571.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • De los Santos B, Hortaçsu A, Wildenbeest MR (2012) Testing models of consumer search using data on web browsing and purchasing behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2955–2980.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Derakhshan M, Golrezaei N, Manshadi V, Mirrokni V (2020) Product ranking on online platforms. Proc. 21st ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 459.Google Scholar
  • Doval L (2018) Whether or not to open Pandora’s box. J. Econom. Theory 175:127–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eick SG (1988) Gittins procedures for bandits with delayed responses. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B Methodological 50(1):125–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fu H, Li J, Liu D (2023) Pandora box problem with nonobligatory inspection: Hardness and approximation scheme. Proc. 55th Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 789–802.Google Scholar
  • Gabaix X, Laibson D, Moloche G, Weinberg S (2006) Costly information acquisition: Experimental analysis of a boundedly rational model. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(4):1043–1068.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbard P (2022) A model of search with two stages of information acquisition and additive learning. Management Sci. 68(2):1212–1217.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gittins J (1979) Bandit processes and dynamic allocation indices. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B Methodological 41(2):148–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittins J, Glazebrook K, Weber R (2011) Multi-Armed Bandit Allocation Indices (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Immorlica N, Leshno J, Lo I, Lucier B (2020) Information acquisition in matching markets: The role of price discovery. Preprint, submitted November 23, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3705049.Google Scholar
  • Miller RA (1984) Job matching and occupational choice. J. Political Econom. 92(6):1086–1120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olszewski W, Weber R (2015) A more general pandora rule? J. Econom. Theory 160:429–437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pandey S, Chakrabarti D, Agarwal D (2007) Multi-armed bandit problems with dependent arms. Proc. 24th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 721–728.Google Scholar
  • Powell WB (2007) Approximate Dynamic Programming: Solving the Curses of Dimensionality, vol. 703 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robert J, Stahl DO (1993) Informative price advertising in a sequential search model. Econometrica 61(3):657–686.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singla S (2018) The price of information in combinatorial optimization. Proc. 29th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SIAM, Philadelphia), 2523–2532.Google Scholar
  • Ursu RM (2018) The power of rankings: Quantifying the effect of rankings on online consumer search and purchase decisions. Marketing Sci. 37(4):530–552.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vishwanath T (1992) Parallel search for the best alternative. Econom. Theory 2:495–507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weitzman ML (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whittle P (1980) Multi-armed bandits and the Gittins index. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B Methodological 42(2):143–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.