Fair Fares for Vehicle Sharing Systems

References

• Balseiro SR, Brown DB, Chen C (2019) Dynamic pricing of relocating resources in large networks. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Rev. 47(1):29–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Freund D, Lykouris T (2022) Pricing and optimization in shared vehicle systems: An approximation framework. Oper. Res. 70(3):1783–1805.Link, Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Johari R, Riquelme C (2015) Pricing in ride-sharing platforms: A queueing-theoretic approach. Proc. 16th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 639.Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Shen X (2023) Pricing in on-demand and one-way vehicle-sharing networks. Oper. Res. 71(5):1596–1609.Link, Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S, Wu S, Liu H, Gunnarsson EB (2022) Dimensioning on-demand vehicle sharing systems. Management Sci. 68(2):1218–1232.Link, Google Scholar
• Besbes O, Castro F, Lobel I (2021) Surge pricing and its spatial supply response. Management Sci. 67(3):1350–1367.Link, Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Candogan O, Saban D (2019) Spatial pricing in ride-sharing networks. Oper. Res. 67(3):744–769.Link, Google Scholar
• Castillo JC (2018) Who benefits from surge pricing? Preprint, submitted September 24, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3245533.Google Scholar
• Chang Y, Winston C, Yan J (2022) Does uber benefit travelers by price discrimination? J. Law Econom. 65(S2):S433–S459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Zhang X, Zhou Y (2026) Fairness-aware online price discrimination with nonparametric demand models. Oper. Res. 74(1):118–129.Google Scholar
• Chen X, Xu Z, Zhao Z, Zhou Y (2023) Personalized pricing with group fairness constraint. Proc. Conf. Fairness Accountability Transparency.Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Guo Y, Stuart AL, Zhang Y, Li X (2019) Exploring the equity performance of bike-sharing systems with disaggregated data: A story of southern Tampa. Transportation Res. Part A Policy Practice 130:529–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MC, Elmachtoub AN, Lei X (2022) Price discrimination with fairness constraints. Management Sci. 68(12):8536–8552.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen MC, Miao S, Wang Y (2025) Dynamic pricing with fairness constraints. Oper. Res., ePub ahead of print May 22, https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2023.0123.Google Scholar
• Das S, Dhamal S, Ghalme G, Jain S, Gujar S (2022) Individual fairness in feature-based pricing for monopoly markets. Proc. 38th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 180 (PMLR, New York), 486–495.Google Scholar
• De-Arteaga M, Feuerriegel S, Saar-Tsechansky M (2022) Algorithmic fairness in business analytics: Directions for research and practice. Production Oper. Management 31(10):3749–3770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickerson JP, Sankararaman KA, Srinivasan A, Xu P (2021) Allocation problems in ride-sharing platforms: Online matching with offline reusable resources. ACM Trans. Econom. Comput. 9(3):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Esmaeili S, Duppala S, Cheng D, Nanda V, Srinivasan A, Dickerson JP (2023) Rawlsian fairness in online bipartite matching: Two-sided, group, and individual. Proc. AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 37, 5624–5632.Google Scholar
• George DK, Xia CH (2011) Fleet-sizing and service availability for a vehicle rental system via closed queueing networks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 211(1):198–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He L, Mak HY, Rong Y, Shen ZJM (2017) Service region design for urban electric vehicle sharing systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(2):309–327.Link, Google Scholar
• Kallus N, Zhou A (2021) Fairness, welfare, and equity in personalized pricing. Proc. ACM Conf. Fairness Accountability Transparency, 296–314.Google Scholar
• Kanoria Y, Qian P (2024) Blind dynamic resource allocation in closed networks via mirror backpressure. Management Sci. 70(8):5445–5462.Link, Google Scholar
• Lesmana NS, Zhang X, Bei X (2019) Balancing efficiency and fairness in on-demand ridesourcing. Wallach HM, Larochelle H, Beygelzimer A, d’Alché-Buc F, Fox EB, Garnett R, eds. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems, vol. 32 (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 5310–5320.Google Scholar
• Li M, Qin Z, Jiao Y, Yang Y, Wang J, Wang C, Wu G, et al. (2019) Efficient ridesharing order dispatching with mean field multi-agent reinforcement learning. Proc. World Wide Web Conf., 983–994.Google Scholar
• Ma H, Fang F, Parkes DC (2022) Spatio-temporal pricing for ridesharing platforms. Oper. Res. 70(2):1025–1041.Link, Google Scholar
• McKenzie G (2019) Spatiotemporal comparative analysis of scooter-share and bike-share usage patterns in Washington, DC. J. Transportation Geography 78:19–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mooney SJ, Hosford K, Howe B, Yan A, Winters M, Bassok A, Hirsch JA (2019) Freedom from the station: Spatial equity in access to dockless bike share. J. Transportation Geography 74:91–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nanda V, Xu P, Sankararaman KA, Dickerson J, Srinivasan A (2020) Balancing the tradeoff between profit and fairness in rideshare platforms during high-demand hours. Proc. AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, 2210–2217.Google Scholar
• Özkan E, Ward AR (2020) Dynamic matching for real-time ride sharing. Stoch. Syst. 10(1):29–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Pandey A, Caliskan A (2021) Disparate impact of artificial intelligence bias in ridehailing economy’s price discrimination algorithms. Proc. AAAI/ACM Conf. AI Ethics Soc., 822–833.Google Scholar
• Qin Z, Tang X, Jiao Y, Zhang F, Xu Z, Zhu H, Ye J (2020) Ride-hailing order dispatching at Didi via reinforcement learning. INFORMS J. Appl. Anal. 50(5):272–286.Link, Google Scholar
• Raman N, Shah S, Dickerson JP (2021) Data-driven methods for balancing fairness and efficiency in ride-pooling. Zhou Z, ed. Proc. 30th Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rea D, Lozano L, Froehle C (2024) Equality, equity, and profit: Exploring fairness-performance trade-offs in allocation models. Preprint, submitted March 6, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4746049.Google Scholar
• Saxena NA, Zhang W, Shahabi C (2024) Unveiling and mitigating bias in ride-hailing pricing for equitable policy making. AI Ethics 1–12.Google Scholar
• Sühr T, Biega AJ, Zehlike M, Gummadi KP, Chakraborty A (2019) Two-sided fairness for repeated matchings in two-sided markets: A case study of a ride-hailing platform. Proc. 25th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 3082–3092.Google Scholar
• Taylor PG (2011) Insensitivity in Stochastic Models (Springer US, Boston, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waserhole A, Jost V (2016) Pricing in vehicle sharing systems: Optimization in queuing networks with product forms. EURO J. Transportation Logist. 5(3):293–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu J, Qiao D, Wang YX (2023) Doubly fair dynamic pricing. Proc. Internat. Conf. Artificial Intelligence Statist. (PMLR, New York), 9941–9975.Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Li Z, Guan Q, Zhang D, Li Q, Nan J, Liu C, et al. (2018) Large-scale order dispatch in on-demand ride-hailing platforms: A learning and planning approach. Proc. 24th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 905–913.Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Lei X, Gao P (2023) Regulating discriminatory pricing in the presence of tacit collusion. Preprint, submitted November 30, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4633784.Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Fu X, Gao P, Chen YJ (2024) Fairness regulation of prices in competitive markets. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 26(5):1897–1917.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Chen X, Zhang X, Zhou Y (2022) Dynamic car dispatching and pricing: Revenue and fairness for ridesharing platforms. Raedt LD, ed. Proc. 31st Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence.Crossref, Google Scholar