Synthetic Interventions: Extending Synthetic Controls to Multiple Treatments

References

• Abadie A (2021) Using synthetic controls: Feasibility, data requirements, and methodological aspects. J. Econom. Literature 59(2):391–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abadie A, Gardeazabal J (2003) The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(1):113–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J (2010) Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 105(490):493–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal A, Syrgkanis V (2022) Synthetic blip effects: Generalizing synthetic controls for the dynamic treatment regime. Preprint, submitted October 20, https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11003.Google Scholar
• Agarwal A, Shah D, Shen D (2025) On model identification and out-of-sample prediction of PCR with applications to synthetic controls. J. Machine Learn. Res. 26(117):1–58.Google Scholar
• Agarwal A, Shah D, Shen D, Song D (2021) On robustness of principal component regression. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 116(536):1731–1745.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amjad MJ, Shah D, Shen D (2018) Robust synthetic control. J. Machine Learn. Res. 19(22):1–51.Google Scholar
• Amjad M, Mishra V, Shah D, Shen D (2019) MRSC: Multi-dimensional robust synthetic control. Proc. ACM Measurement Anal. Comput. Syst. 3(2):37. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anandkumar A, Ge R, Hsu D, Kakade SM, Telgarsky M (2014) Tensor decompositions for learning latent variable models. J. Machine Learn. Res. 15(1):2773–2832.Google Scholar
• Arkhangelsky D, Hirshberg D (2023) Large-sample properties of the synthetic control method under selection on unobservables. Preprint, submitted November 22, https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.13575.Google Scholar
• Arkhangelsky D, Athey S, Hirshberg DA, Imbens GW, Wager S (2021) Synthetic difference-in-differences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(12):4088–4118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Bayati M, Doudchenko N, Imbens G, Khosravi K (2021) Matrix completion methods for causal panel data models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 116(536):1716–1730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai J (2003) Inferential theory for factor models of large dimensions. Econometrica 71(1):135–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai J, Ng S (2021) Matrix completion, counterfactuals, and factor analysis of missing data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 116(536):1746–1763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barak B, Moitra A (2016) Noisy tensor completion via the sum-of-squares hierarchy. Feldman V, Rakhlin A, Shamir O, eds. Proc. 29th Annual Conf. Learn. Theory, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 49 (JMLR.org), 417–445.Google Scholar
• Ben-Michael E, Feller A, Rothstein J (2021a) The augmented synthetic control method. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 116(536):1789–1803.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Michael E, Feller A, Rothstein J (2021b) Synthetic controls with staggered adoption. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B: Stat. Methodol. 84(2):351–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bishop CM (1998) Bayesian PCA. Kearns M, Solla S, Cohn D, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 11 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 382–388. Google Scholar
• Bottmer L, Imbens GW, Spiess J, Warnick M (2024) A design-based perspective on synthetic control methods. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 42(2):762–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bühlmann P (2013) Statistical significance in high-dimensional linear models. Bernoulli 19(4):1212–1242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carvalho C, Masini R, Medeiros MC (2018) ArCo: An artificial counterfactual approach for high-dimensional panel time-series data. J. Econom. 207(2):352–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattaneo MD, Feng Y, Titiunik R (2021) Prediction intervals for synthetic control methods. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 116(536):1865–1880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattaneo MD, Feng Y, Palomba F, Titiunik R (2022) Uncertainty quantification in synthetic controls with staggered treatment adoption. Preprint, submitted October 10, https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.05026.Google Scholar
• Chamberlain G, Rothschild M (1983) Arbitrage, factor structure, and mean-variance analysis on large asset markets. Econometrica 51(5):1281–1304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S (2015) Matrix estimation by universal singular value thresholding. Ann. Statist. 43(1):177–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chernozhukov V, Wuthrich K, Zhu Y (2018) Debiasing and t-tests for synthetic control inference on average causal effects. Preprint, submitted December 27, https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.10820.Google Scholar
• Chernozhukov V, Wüthrich K, Zhu Y (2021) An exact and robust conformal inference method for counterfactual and synthetic controls. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 116(536):1849–1864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doudchenko N, Imbens G (2016) Balancing, regression, difference-in-differences and synthetic control methods: A synthesis. NBER Working Paper No. 22791, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Fan J, Wang W, Zhong Y (2018) An eigenvector perturbation bound and its application to robust covariance estimation. J. Machine Learn. Res. 18(207):1–42.Google Scholar
• Gandy S, Recht B, Yamada I (2011) Tensor completion and low—Rank tensor recovery via convex optimization. Inverse Problems 27(2):025010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavish M, Donoho D (2014) The optimal hard threshold for singular values is 43. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 60(8):5040–5053.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsiao C, Steve Ching H, Ki Wan S (2012) A panel data approach for program evaluation: Measuring the benefits of political and economic integration of Hong Kong with mainland China. J. Appl. Econometrics 27(5):705–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Rubin DB (2015) Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kallus N, Mao X, Udell M (2018) Causal inference with noisy and missing covariates via matrix factorization. Bengio S, Wallach H, Larochelle H, Grauman K, Cesa-Bianchi N, Garnett R, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 31 (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 6921–6932.Google Scholar
• Li KT (2020) Statistical inference for average treatment effects estimated by synthetic control methods. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 115(532):2068–2083.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li KT, Bell DR (2017) Estimation of average treatment effects with panel data: Asymptotic theory and implementation. J. Econom. 197(1):65–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu J, Musialski P, Wonka P, Ye J (2009) Tensor completion for estimating missing values in visual data. 2009 IEEE 12th Internat. Conf. Comput. Vision (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ), 2114–2121.Google Scholar
• Rubin DB (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J. Ed. Psych. 66(5):688–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaikh AM, Toulis P (2021) Randomization tests in observational studies with staggered adoption of treatment. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 116(536):1835–1848.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen D, Ding P, Sekhon J, Yu B (2023) Same root different leaves: Time series and cross-sectional methods in panel data. Econometrica 91(6):2125–2154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Splawa-Neyman J (1990) On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. Essay on principles. Section 9. Statist. Sci. 5(4):465–472. Translated and edited by Dabrowska DM and Speed TP.Google Scholar
• Tipping ME, Bishop CM (1999) Probabilistic principal component analysis. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B: Statist. Methodology 61(3):611–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Udell M, Townsend A (2017) Nice latent variable models have log-rank.Google Scholar
• Udell M, Townsend A (2019) Why are big data matrices approximately low rank? SIAM J. Math. Data Sci. 1(1):144–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu J (2018) Rates of convergence of spectral methods for graphon estimation. Dy J, Krause A, eds. Proc. 35th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn., Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 80 (JMLR.org), 5433–5442.Google Scholar