Optimal Pricing of Priority Services

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.46.1.46

References

  • Balachandran K. R. Purchasing priorities in queues. Management Sci. (1972) 18(5):319–326LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Balachandran K. R., Lukens J. C. Stable pricing policies in service systems. Zeitschrift für Oper. Res. (1976) 20:189–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balachandran K. R., Schaefer M. E. Class dominance characteristics at a service facility. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):515–519CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beja A., Sid E. Optimal priority assignment with heterogeneous waiting costs. Opns. Res. (1975) 23:107–117LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bell C. E., Stidham S. Individual versus social optimization in the allocation of customers to alternative servers. Management Sci. (1983) 29(7):831–839LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dewan S., Mendelson H. User delay costs and internal pricing for a service facility. Management Sci. (1990) 36(12):1502–1516LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dolan R. J. Incentive mechanisms for priority queueing problems. Bell J. Econom. (1978) 9(2):421–436CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hurley W. J., Petersen E. R. Nonlinear tariffs and freight network equilibrium. Transportation Sci. (1994) 28(3):236–245LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jaiswal N. K.Priority Queues (1968) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Edelson N. M., Hildebrand D. K. Congestion tolls for Poisson queueing processes. Econometrica (1975) 43(1):81–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Federgruen A., Groenvelt H. The impact of the composition of the customer base in general queueing models. J. Appl. Probab. (1987) 24:709–724CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knudsen N. C. Individual and social optimization in a multi-server queue with a general cost-benefit structure. Econometrica (1972) 40:515–528CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H., Cohen M. A note on the convexity of performance measures of M/M/c queueing systems. J. Appl. Probab. (1983) 20:920–923CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman S. A., Stidham S. Individual versus social optimization in exponential congestion systems. Opns. Res. (1977) 25:233–247LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marchand M. Priority pricing. Management Sci. (1974) 20:1131–1140LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mendelson H., Whang S. Optimal incentive-compatible priority pricing for the M/M/1 queue. Opns. Res. (1990) 38:870–883LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Naor P. On the regulation of queue size by levying tolls. Econometrica (1969) 37:15–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oi W. Y. A disneyland dilemma: Two part tariffs for a mickey mouse monopoly. Quart. J. Econom. (1971) 85:77–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petersen E. R. Over-the-road transit time for a single track railway. Transportation Sci. (1974) 8(1):65–74LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Petersen E. R. Railyard modelling I, prediction of put-through times. Transportation Sci. (1974) 11(1):37–49LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Petersen E. R. Railyard modelling II, the effect of yard facilities on congestion. Transportation Sci. (1974) 11(1):50–59LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Petersen E. R., Taylor A. J.PROPS+, Probabilistic and Optimization Spreadsheets (1994) (Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Petersen E. R., Rao S. A dynamic programming model for assigning customers to priority service classes. (1993) . School of Business Working paper no. 93-24, Queen's University, Kingston, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  • Rey P., Tirole J. The logic of vertical restraints. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76:921–939Google Scholar
  • Sanders B. A. A private good public good decomposition for optimal flow control of an M/M/1 queue. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control (1985) 30(11):1143–1145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanders B. A. An incentive compatible flow control algorithm for rate allocation in computer networks. IEEE Trans. Comput. (1988) 37(9):1067–1072CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sheffi Y.Urban Transportation Networks (1985) (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Tirole J.The Theory of Industrial Organization (1990) (MIT Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.