An Integer Optimization Approach to a Probabilistic Reserve Site Selection Problem

References

  • Anderson C. E. Evaluation of Selected Potential Candidate Research Natural Areas as Representative of Ecological Landtype Associations on the Superior National Forest. (1997) . Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Biological Report No. 58 (plus maps and appendixes)Google Scholar
  • Ando A., Camm J. D., Polasky S., Solow A. R. Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation. Science (1998) 279:2126–2128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bedward M., Pressey R. L., Keith D. A. A new approach for selecting fully representative reserve networks: Addressing efficiency, reserve design, and land suitability with an iterative analysis. Biol. Conservation (1992) 62:115–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camm J. D., Polasky S., Solow A. R., Csuti B. A note on optimal algorithms for reserve site selection. Biol. Conservation (1996) 78:353–355CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Church R. L., ReVelle C. S. The maximal covering location problem. Papers in Regional Sci. (1974) 32:101–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Church R. L., Stoms D. M., Davis F. W. Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem. Biol. Conservation (1996) 76:105–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cocks K. D., Baird I. A. Using mathematical programming to address the multiple reserve selection problem: An example from the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia. Biol. Conservation (1989) 49:113–130CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. W., Stoms D., Scott J. M., Tear T. H., Davis F. A spatial analytical hierarchy for Gap Analysis. Gap Analysis: A Landscape Approach to Biodiversity Planning (1996) (American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD) 15–24Google Scholar
  • Davis F. W., Stoms D., Church R. L., Okin W. J., Johnson K. N. Selecting biodiversity management areas. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress (1996) 1(58). University of California at Davis, Centers for Water and Wildland ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  • Dean D. J., Wilson K. R., Flather C. H. Spatial error analysis of species richness for a gap analysis map. Photogrammatic Engrg. Remote Sensing (1997) 63:1211–1217Google Scholar
  • Dobson A. P., Rodriguez J. P., Roberts W. M., Wilcove D. S. Geographic distribution of endangered species in the United States. Science (1997) 275:550–553CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faber-Langendoen D. State Natural Heritage Program Ecologists. Terrestrial Vegetation of the Midwestern United States. International Classification of Ecological Communities: Terrestrial Vegetation of the United States (1996) (The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA) Google Scholar
  • Flather C. H., Wilson K. R., Dean D. J., McComb W. C. Identifying gaps in conservation networks: of indicators and uncertainty in geographic-based analyses. Ecological Appl. (1997) 7:531–542CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • GAMS Development CorporationGeneral Algebraic Modeling System (1990) (Washington, DC). Version 2.25.090Google Scholar
  • Keys J., Carpenter C., Hooks S., Koenig F., McNab W. H., Russell W. E., Smith M. L. Ecological units of the eastern United States—first approximation (map and booklet of map unit tables). (1995) . Atlanta, GA. (USDA, Forest Service, presentation scale 1:3,500,000; colored.)Google Scholar
  • Kirkpatrick J. B. An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: An example from Tasmania. Biol. Conservation (1983) 25:127–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lombard A. T., Cowling R. M., Pressey R. L., Mustart P. J. Reserve selection in a species-rich and fragmented landscape on the Agulhas Plain, South Africa. Conservation Biol. (1997) 11:1101–1116CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Margules C. R., Nicholls A. O., Pressey R. L. Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity. Biol. Conservation (1988) 43:63–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Margules C. R., Usher M. B. Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: A review. Biol. Conservation (1981) 21:79–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McNab W. H., Avers P. E.comps. Ecological subregions of the United States: Section descriptions. (1994) (Administrative Publication WO-WSA-5, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Nicholls A. O., Margules C. R. An updated reserve selection algorithm. Biological Conservation (1993) 64:165–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Noss R. F., Cooperrider A. Y.Saving Nature's Legacy (1994) (Island Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Pimm S. L., Lawton J. H. Planning for biodiversity. Science (1998) 279:2068–2069CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polasky S., Ding R., Solow A. R., Camm J. D., Csuti B. Choosing reserve networks with incomplete species information. Biol. Conservation (2000) 94:1–10CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pressey R. L., Humphries C. J., Margules C. R., Vane-Wright R. I., Williams P. H. Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends Ecol. and Evolution (1993) 8:124–128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pressey R. L., Nicholls A. O. Efficiency in conservation planning—Scoring versus iterative approaches. Biol. Conservation (1989) 50:199–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pressey R. L., Possingham H. P., Day J. R. Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reserves. Biol. Conservation (1997) 80:207–219CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pressey R. L., Possingham H. P., Margules C. R. Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: When does it matter and how much?. Biol. Conservation (1996) 76:259–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rebelo A. G., Siegfried W. R. Protection of fynbos vegetation: Ideal and real world options. Biol. Conservation (1990) 54:15–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • ReVelle C. S. Facility siting and integer friendly programming. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1993) 65(2):147–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • ReVelle C. S., Hogan K. A reliability constrained siting model with local estimates of busy fractions. Environ. Planning (1988) B15:143–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • ReVelle C. S., Hogan K. The maximum availability location problem. Trans. Sci. (1989) 23:192–200LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Saetersdal M., Line J. M., Birks H. J. B. How to maximize biological diversity in nature reserve selection: Vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous woodlands, western Norway. Biol. Conservation (1993) 66:131–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snyder S. A., Tyrrell L. E., Haight R. G. An optimization approach to selecting research natural areas in national forests. Forest Sci. (1999) 45(3):458–469Google Scholar
  • Terborgh J. W., Winter B. A method for siting parks and reserves with special reference to Columbia and Ecuador. Biol. Conservation (1983) 27:45–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Toregas C., ReVelle C. S. Binary logic solutions to a class of location problems. Geographical Anal. (1973) 5:145–155CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Underhill L. G. Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms. Biol. Conservation (1994) 70:85–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • USDA Forest Service Superior National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. (1986) . Eastern Region, USDA Forest ServiceGoogle Scholar
  • Vane-Wright R. I., Humphries C. J., Williams P. H. What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conservation (1991) 55:235–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Von Winterfeldt D., Edwards W.Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research (1986) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Vora R. S. Identification of potential natural areas, including representative ecosystems, on the Superior National Forest. (1997) . Unpublished report on file with the USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MNGoogle Scholar
  • Williams J. C., ReVelle C. S. A 0-1 programming approach to delineating protected reserves. Environ. Planning (1996) B23:607–624CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams J. C., ReVelle C. S. Applying mathematical programming to reserve selection. Environ. Model. Assessment (1997) 2:167–175CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams J. C., ReVelle C. S. Reserve assemblages of critical areas: A zero-one programming approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1998) 104(3):497–509CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Willis C. K., Lombard A. T., Cowling R. M., Heydenrych B. J., Burgers C. J. Reserve systems for limestone endemic flora of the Cape Lowland fynbos: Iterative versus linear programming techniques. Biol. Conservation (1996) 77:53–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.