The National Energy Modeling System: A Large-Scale Energy-Economic Equilibrium Model

References

• Ahn B. H.Computation of Market Equilibria for Policy Analysis (1979) (Garland Publishing Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Ahn B. H., Hogan W. W. On convergence of the PIES algorithm for computing equilibria. Oper. Res. (1982) 30:281–300Link, Google Scholar
• Boedecker E., Cymbalsky J., Honeycutt C., Jones J., Kydes A. S., Le D. Energy Information Administration. The Potential Impact of Technological Progress on U.S. Energy Markets. Issues in Midterm Analysis and Forecasting 1996DOE/EIA-0607(96)Google Scholar
• Eaves B. C. On the basic theorem of complementarity. Math. Prog. (1971) 1:68–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Energy Information Administration An Analysis of Carbon Mitigation Cases. (1996) . Service Report Prepared for Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, SR/OIAF/96-01Google Scholar
• Energy Information Administration An Analysis of Carbon Stabilization Cases. (1997a) . Service Report Prepared for Office of Policy and International Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, SR-OIAF/97-01Google Scholar
• Energy Information Administration Electricity Prices in a Competitive Environment: Marginal Cost Pricing of Generation Services and Financial Status of Electric Utilities, A Preliminary Analysis Through 2015. (1997b) . DOE/EIA-0614Google Scholar
• Energy Information Administration The National Energy Modeling System: An Overview. Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting. (1998a) (U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Energy Information Administration Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol on U.S. Energy Markets and Economic Activity. (1998b) . Service Report for the U.S. House of representatives, Committee on Science, SR/OIAF/98-03Google Scholar
• Gabriel S. A. A hybrid smoothing method for the mixed nonlinear complementarity problem. Comput. Optimiz. and Appl. (1998a) 9:153–173Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabriel S. A. An NE/SQP method for the bounded nonlinear complementarity problem. J. Optimiz. Theory and Appl. (1998b) 97:493–506Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabriel S. A., Kydes A. S. A nonlinear complementarity approach for the National Energy Modeling System. (1995) . Preprint MCS-P504-0395, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, ILGoogle Scholar
• Gabriel S. A., Moré J. J., Ferris M. C., Pang J. S. Smoothing of mixed complementarity problems. Complementarity and Variational Problems State of the Art (1997) (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA) 105–116Google Scholar
• Gabriel S. A., Pang J. S. An inexact NE/SQP method for solving the nonlinear complementarity problem. Comput. Optimiz. and Appl. (1992) 1:67–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabriel S. A., Pang J. S., Hager W. W., Hearn D. W., Pardalos P. M. A trust region method for constrained non-smooth equations. Large-Scale Optimization: State of the Art (1994) (Kluwer Academic Publishers)159–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harker P. T., Pang J. S. Finite-dimensional variational inequality and nonlinear complementarity problems: a survey of theory, algorithms and application. Math. Prog. (1990) 48:161–220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartman P., Stampacchia G. On some nonlinear elliptic differential functional equations. Acta Mathematica (1966) 115:153–188Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogan W. W. Energy policy models for project independence. Comput. & Oper. Res. (1975) 2:251–271Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holte S., Luong T., Murphy F., Sanders R., Whitman P. Modeling the impacts of the clean air Act amendments. Interfaces (1998) 28(2):1–20Link, Google Scholar
• Horn R. A., Johnson C. R.Matrix Analysis (1985) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kydes A. S. Sensitivity of energy intensity in U.S. energy markets to technological change and adoption. Energy Information Administration, Issues in Midterm Analysis and Forecasting 1997 (1997) JulyGoogle Scholar
• Kydes A. S. Energy intensity and carbon emission responses to technological change and adoption. Energy J. (1999) 20(3):93–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy F. H., Kydes A. S., et al. An overview of the Intermediate Future Forecasting System. Energy Modeling and Simulation (1983) (North Holland Publishing Company)66–73Google Scholar
• Murphy F. H. Making large-scale models manageable: modeling from an operations management perspective. Oper. Res. (1993) 41:241–252Link, Google Scholar
• Murphy F. H., Conti J. J., Shaw S. H., Sanders R. Modeling and forecasting energy markets with the intermediate future forecasting system. Oper. Res. (1988) 36:406–420Link, Google Scholar
• Murphy F. H., Mudrageda M. V. A decomposition approach for a class of economic equilibrium models. Oper. Res. (1998) 46:368–377Link, Google Scholar
• Pang J. S., Gabriel S. A. NE/SQP: A robust algorithm for the nonlinear complementarity problem. Math. Prog. (1993) 60:295–337Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar R. T.Convex Analysis (1970) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar