Reconsidering the Philosophical Basis of OR/MS

References

  • Abbott A.The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor (1988) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ackoff R. L. The future of operational research is past. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1979) 30:93–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ackoff R. L. OR: A post mortem. Oper. Res. (1987) 35:471–474LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Banville C., Landry M. Can the field of MIS be disciplined?. Comm. ACM (1989) 32(Jan):48–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bennion E. G. Econometrics for management. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1961) 39(March-April):100–112Google Scholar
  • Christenson C. Proposals for a program of empirical research into the properties of triangles. Decision Sci. (1976) 7:631–648CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Commission on the Future Practice of Operational Research Report of the 1986 Commission on the Future Practice of Operational Research. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1986) 37:829–886Google Scholar
  • Corbett C. J., Van Wassenhove L. N. The natural drift: what happened to operations research?. Oper. Res. (1993) 41:625–640LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Bateman T. S., Ferris G. R. Antecedents of significant and not-so-significant organizational research. Method and Analysis in Organizational Research (1984) (Reston, VA)3–14Google Scholar
  • Dando M. R., Sharp R. G. Operational research in the UK in 1977: the cause and consequences of a myth?. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1978) 29:939–950CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drucker P. F.Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices (1973) (Harper & Row, San Francisco) Google Scholar
  • Dyer J., Lasdon L., Ruefli T. The techno-MBA. OR/MS Today (1998) 25(February):32–36Google Scholar
  • Fishmann G. S., Kiviat P. J. The statistics of discrete event simulation. Simulation (1968) 10:185–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galliers R. D., Land F. F. Choosing appropriate information system research methodologies. Comm. ACM (1987) 30:900–902CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gass S. I. Model accreditation: a rationale and process for determining a numerical rating. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1993) 66:250–258CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geoffrion A. M. Forces, trends, and opportunities in OR/MS. Oper. Res. (1992) 40:423–445LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greyson C. J. Management science and business practice. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1973) 51(July-August):41–48Google Scholar
  • Guba E. C., Guba E. C. The Alternative Paradigm Dialog. The Paradigm Dialog (1990) (Sage Publications, Beverley Hills, CA) 17–27Google Scholar
  • Hall R. W. What's so scientific about MS/OR?. Interfaces (1985) 15(March-April):40–45LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen P. A short discussion of the OR crisis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1989) 38:277–281CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hermann C. Validation problems in games and simulation. Behavioral Sci. (1967) 12:216–231CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hesse R. Management science or management/science?. Interfaces (1980) 10(Feb):104–109LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Horner P. The profession's paradox. OR/MS Today (1997) 24(June):24–28Google Scholar
  • Hudson L. A., Ozanne J. L. Alternative ways of seeking knowledge in consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (1988) 14:508–521CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M. C. Organization theory and methodology. Accounting Rev. (1983) 58:319–339Google Scholar
  • Jordan E., Lasdon L., Lenard M., Moore J., Powell S., Willemain T.Report of the Operating Subcommittee of the INFORMS Business School Education Task Force (1996) February(INFORMS, Linthicum, MD) Google Scholar
  • Kaplan A.The Conduct of Inquiry (1964) (Chandler, New York) Google Scholar
  • Keys P. Approaches to understanding the process of OR: review, critique and extension. Omega: Internat. J. Management Sci. (1997) 25:1–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiviat P. J. Digital computer simulation: modeling concepts. Rand Memorandum RM-5378-PR (1967) (Rand Corporation, Santa Monica) Google Scholar
  • Klein H. K., Lyytinen K., Mumford E., Hirschheim R., Fitzgerald G., Wood-Harper T. The poverty of scientism in information systems. Research Methods in Information Systems: Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.2 Colloquium (1984) (Amsterdam, North-Holland) 136Google Scholar
  • Kuhn T. S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1970) second edition(Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Lee A. S. Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: an empirical investigation using hermaneutic interpretation. MIS Quart. (1994) 18:143–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Linstone H. A. Multiple perspectives: overcoming the weaknesses of MS/OR. Interfaces (1985) 15(July-August):77–85LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lissack M. Mind your metaphors: lessons from complexity science. Long Range Planning (1997) 30:294–298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Little J. D. C. Models and Managers: The Concept of a Decision Calculus. Management Science (1970) 16:B-466–B-485LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Meredith J. R. Theory building through conceptual methods. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management (1993) 13:3–11Google Scholar
  • Mingers J., Brocklesby J. Multimethodology: towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega: Internat. J. Management Sci. (1997) 25:489–509CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miser H. J. A foundational concept of science appropriate for validation in operational research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1993) 66:204–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oral M., Kettani O. The facets of the modeling and validation process in operations research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1993) 66:216–234CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Popper K. R.Logic of Scientific Discovery (1959) (Basic Books, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roy B. Decision science or decision-aid science?. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1993) 66:184–203CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samuelson D. A. Promising future, disappointing present. OR/MS Today (1996) 23(April):42–45Google Scholar
  • Smith G. F. Toward a heuristic theory of problem structuring. Management Sci. (1988) 34:1489–1506LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith G. F. Defining managerial problems: a framework for prescriptive theorizing. Management Sci. (1989) 35:963–981LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Swamidass P. M. Empirical science: new frontier in operations management research. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16:793–814CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tinker T., Lowe T. One-dimensional management science: the making of a technocratic consciousness. Interfaces (1984) 14(March-April):40–56LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Walsham G. Management science and organisational change: a framework for analysis. OMEGA (1992) 20:1–9CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E., McFarland F. W. Theoretical assumptions and research methodology selection. The Information Systems Challenge (1984) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) 111–132Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.