Optimal Dynamic Allocation of Treatment and Enforcement in Illicit Drug Control

References

• Baveja A., Caulkins J. P., Liu W., Batta R., Karwan M. H. When haste makes sense: cracking down on street markets for illicit drugs. Socio-Economic Planning Sci. (1997) 31:293–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker G. S., Grossman M., Murphy K. M. An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1994) 84:397–418Google Scholar
• Behrens D. A., Caulkins J. P., Tragler G., Feichtinger G. Controlling the U.S. cocaine epidemic: prevention from light vs. treatment of heavy use. (1997) . Working Paper 214, Department of Operations Research and Systems Theory, Vienna University of Technology.Google Scholar
• Caulkins J. P., Green Mazerolle L., Roehl J. The cost-effectiveness of civil remedies: the case of drug control interventions. Crime Prevention Stud. (1998) 9:219–237Google Scholar
• Caulkins J. P., Reuter P. Setting goals for drug policy: harm reduction or use reduction. Addiction (1997) 92:1143–1150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caulkins J. P. What price data tell us about drug markets. J. Drug Issues (1998) 28(3):593–612Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caulkins J. P., Crawford G., Reuter P. Simulation of adaptive response: a model of drug interdiction. Math. Comput. Model (1993) 17:37–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caulkins J. P., Rydell C. P., Schwabe W. L., Chiesa J.Mandatory Minimum Drug Sentences: Throwing Away the Key or the Taxpayers' Money? (1997) (RAND, Santa Monica, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crane B. D., Rivolo A. R., Comfort G. C. An empirical examination of counterdrug program effectiveness. (1997) . IDA Paper P-3219, Institute for Defense Analysis, Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
• Dechert W. D., Nishimura K. A complete characterization of optimal growth paths in an aggregated model with a non-concave production function. J. Econom. Theory (1983) 31(2):332–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Everingham S. S., Rydell C. P.Modeling the Demand for Cocaine (1994) (RAND, Santa Monica, CA) Google Scholar
• Farrell G., Mansur K., Tullis M. Cocaine and heroin in europe 1983-93: a cross-national comparison of trafficking and prices. British J. Criminology (1996) 36:255–281Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feichtinger G., Hartl R.Optimale Kontrolle Ökonomischer Prozesse—Anwendungen des Maximumprinzips in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften (1986) (deGruyter, Berlin) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feichtinger G., Grienauer W., Tragler G. Optimal dynamic law enforcement. (1997) . Working Paper 197, Department of Operations Research and Systems Theory, Vienna University of Technology.Google Scholar
• Gerstein D. R., Johnson R. A., Harwood H. J., Fontain D., Suter N., Malloy K.Evaluating Recovery Services: The California Drug and Alcohol Treatment Assessment (1994) (National Opinion Research Center/Lewin-VHI, Chicago, IL/Fairfax, VA) Google Scholar
• Hartl R. F. A simple proof of the monotonicity of the state trajectories in autonomous control problems. J. Econom. Theory (1987) 41:211–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson R. A., Gerstein D. R., Ghadialy R., Choy W., Gfroerer J.Trends in the Incidence of Drug Use in the United States, 1919-1992 (1996) (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Kleiman M. A. R. Enforcement swamping: a positive-feedback mechanism in rates of illicit activity. Math. Comput. Model (1993) 17:65–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleiman M. A. R., Chaiken M. R. Crackdowns: the effects of intensive enforcement on retail heroin dealing. Street-Level Drug Enforcement: Examining the Issues (1988) (National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Léonard D., Long N. V.Optimal Control Theory and Static Optimization in Economics (1992) (CUP, Cambridge) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller T. R., Cohen M. A., Wiersema B.Victim Costs and Consequences: A New Look (1996) (National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Moore M. H. Achieving discrimination on the effective price of heroin. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1973) 63:270–277Google Scholar
• Musto D. F.The American Disease (1987) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
• Office of National Drug Control Policy. Various yearsThe National Drug Control Strategy(The White House, Washington, DC)Google Scholar
• Reuter P.Disorganized Crime: The Economics of the Visible Hand (1983) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Reuter P., Kleiman M. A. R., Morris N., Tonry M. Risks and prices: an economic analysis of drug enforcement. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research (1986) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rydell C. P., Everingham S. S.Controlling Cocaine. Supply Versus Demand Programs (1994) (RAND, Santa Monica, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rydell C. P., Caulkins J. P., Everingham S. S. Enforcement or treatment? modeling the relative efficacy of alternatives for controlling cocaine. Oper. Res. (1996) 44:1–9Link, Google Scholar
• Saffer H., Chaloupka F. The Demand for Illicit Drugs. (1995) . Working Paper No. 5238, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Skiba A. K. Optional growth with a convex-concave production function. Econometrica (1978) 46:527–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tragler G., Caulkins J. P., Feichtinger G. The impact of enforcement and treatment on illicit drug consumption. (1997) . Working Paper 212, Department of Operations Research and Systems Theory, Vienna University of Technology, ViennaGoogle Scholar
• Varian H. R.Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach (1996) 4th Edition(W. W. Norton & Company, New York) Google Scholar