SMAA-2: Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis for Group Decision Making

References

  • Bana e Costa C. A. A multicriteria decision aid methodology to deal with conflicting situations on the weights. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1986) 26:22–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bana e Costa C. A. A methodology for sensitivity analysis in three-criteria problems: a case study in municipal management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1988) 33:159–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barron F. H., Barrett B. E. Decision quality using ranked attribute weights. Management Sci. (1996) 42(11):1515–1523LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Borcherding K., Eppel T., von Winterfeldt D. Comparison of weighting judgments in multiattribute utility measurement. Management Sci. (1991) 37(12):1603–1619LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brans J. P., Vincke Ph. A preference ranking organization method. Management Sci. (1985) 31(6):647–656LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Charnetski J. R., Soland R. M. Multiple-attribute decision making with partial information: the comparative hypervolume criterion. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. (1978) 25:279–288CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greco S., Matarazzo B., Slowinski R. Rough set approach to multi-attribute choice and ranking problems. (1995) . ICS Research Report 38/95, Institute of Computer Science, Warsaw University of Technology, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  • Hipel K. W. Fuzzy set techniques in decision making:. Resource Management Optim. (1983) 2(3):187–203Google Scholar
  • Hokkanen J., Lahdelma R., Miettinen K., Salminen P. Determining the implementation order of a general plan by using a multicriteria method. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. (1998) 7:273–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hokkanen J., Lahdelma R., Miettinen K. A multiple criteria decision model for analyzing and choosing among different development patterns for the helsinki cargo harbor. Socio-Econom. Planning Sci. (1999) 33:1–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hokkanen J., Lahdelma R., Salminen P. Multicriteria decision support in a technology competition for cleaning polluted soil in Helsinki. J. Environmental Management (2000) 60(4):339–348CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47:262–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kornbluth J. S. H. Dynamic multi-criteria decision making. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. (1992) 1:81–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lahdelma R., Hokkanen J., Salminen P. SMAA—stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1998) 106(1):137–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lahdelma R., Salminen P., Hokkanen J. Using multicriteria methods in environmental planning and management. Environmental Management (2000) 26(6):595–605CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nijkamp P., Rietveld P., Voogd H.Multicriteria Evaluation Physical Planning (1990) (North-Holland, Amsterdam) Google Scholar
  • Pawlak Z. Rough sets. Internat. J. Comput. Inform. Sci. (1982) 11:341–356CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rietveld P.Multiple Objective Decision Methods and Regional Planning (1980) (North Holland, Amsterdam) Google Scholar
  • Roy B.Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding (1996) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht The Netherlands) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salminen P., Wallenius J. Testing prospect theory in a deterministic multiple criteria decision making environment. Decision Sci. (1993) 24:279–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salminen P., Hokkanen J., Lahdelma R.Multicriteria Decision Making Project on Environmental Problems (1996) (University of Jyväskylä, Department of Mathematics, Laboratory of Scientific Computing, 5/1996) Google Scholar
  • Schoemaker P. J., Waid C. C. An experimental comparison of different approaches to determining weights in additive value models. Management Sci. (1982) 28(2):182–196LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stillwell W. G., von Winterfeldt D., John R. S. Comparing hierarchical and nonhierarchical weighting methods for eliciting multiattribute value models. Management Sci. (1987) 33(4):442–450LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Nitzsch R., Weber M. The effect of attribute ranges on weights in multiattribute utility measurements:. Management Sci. (1993) 39(8):937–943LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Voogd H.Multicriteria Evaluation for Urban and Regional Planning (1983) (Pion Ltd., London) Google Scholar
  • Weber M., Borcherding K. Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1993) 67:1–12CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zadeh L. A. Fuzzy sets. Inform. Control (1965) 8(3):338–353CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.