The Analytic Hierarchy Process—An Exposition

References

• Bell D. E., Raiffa H., Tversky A.Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions (1988) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell D. E., Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Conflicting Objectives in Decisions (1977) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Belton V., Gear T. On a shortcoming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchies. Omega (1982) 11(3):226–230Google Scholar
• Chankong V., Haimes Y. Y.Multiobjective Decision Making (1983) (North-Holland, New York) Google Scholar
• Buede D. M., Maxwell D. T. Rank disagreement: a comparison of multicriteria methodologies. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (1995) 4(1):1–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Churchman C. W. Measurement for management decision: a perspective. California Management Review (1979) 21(3):14Google Scholar
• Corbin R., Marley A. A. J. Random utility models with equality: an apparent, but not actual, generalization of random utility models. J. Mathematical Psychology (1974) 11:274–293Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., Simon H. A., Trow D. B. Observations of a business decision. J. Business (1956) 29:237–248Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. S. Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Sci. (1990) 36(3):249–258Link, Google Scholar
• Eyrich H. G. Benchmarking to become the best of breed. Manufacturing Systems Magazine (1991) AprilGoogle Scholar
• Fishburn P. C. Nontransitive preferences in decision theory. J. Risk and Uncertainty (1991) 4:113–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishman G. S., Kiviat P. J. Digital computer simulation: statistical considerations, RM-5387-PR. (1967) (The RAND Corp., Santa Monica, CA) . Also published as The Statistics of Discrete Event Simulation, Simulation, April 1968Google Scholar
• Forman E. H. Relative vs. absolute worth. Mathematical Modeling (1987) 9(3-5):195–202Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman E. H. AHP is intended for more than expected value calculations. Decision Sci. (1990) 21(3):670–672Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman E. H. Deriving ratio level measures from verbal judgments. (1990) (George Washington University Working Paper)Google Scholar
• Forman E. H. Ideal and distributed synthesis modes for the analytic hierarchy process. (1993) (George Washington University Working Paper)Google Scholar
• Forman E. H., Saaty T. L., Selly M. A., Waldron R.Expert Choice (1983) (Decision Support Software, McLean, VA) Google Scholar
• Forman E. H., Selly M. A.Decision By Objectives (1999) (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore) . 〈www.mdm.gwu.edu/forman〉 and in preparationGoogle Scholar
• Gass S. I. Decision-aiding models: validation, assessment, and related issues for policy analysis. Oper. Res. (1983) 31(4):603–631Link, Google Scholar
• Gass S. I. Tournaments, transitivity and pairwise comparison matrices. Oper. Res. (1998) 49(6):616–624Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gump Forrest. Forrest Gump-The Movie (1994) (Paramount Studios)Google Scholar
• Harker P. T. Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process. Math Modeling (1987) 9(11):837–848Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber J., Puto C. Market boundaries and product choice: illustrating attraction and substitution effects. J. Consumer Res. (1983) 10(06):31–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber J., Payne J. W., Puto C. Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(06):90–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang C.-L., Yoon K.Multiple Attribute Decision Making (1981) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preference and Value Tradeoffs (1976) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Kirkwood C.Strategic Decision Making—Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets (1997) (Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA) Google Scholar
• Kuhn Thomas S.The Structure of Scientific Revolution (1962) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Levin Henry M.Cost-Effectiveness, A Primer New Perspectives in Evaluation, Volume 4 (1983) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) 121Google Scholar
• Luce R. D., Raiffa H.Games and Decisions (1957) (John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• McCord M., de Neufville R., French S., Hartley R., Thomas L. C., White D. J. Fundamental deficiency of expected utility decision analysis. Multi-Objective Decision Making (1983) (Academic Press, New York) 179–305Google Scholar
• Martin James. Design of Man-Computer Dialogues (1973) (Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Mirkin B. G.Group Choice (1979) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Milnor J., Thrall R. M., Coombs C. H., Davis R. L. Games against nature. Decision Processes (1954) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 49–60Google Scholar
• Osborne M. J., Rubinstein A.A Course in Game Theory (1994) (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Ozernoi V. M., Gaft M. G., Bell D. E., Keeney R. L., Raiffa H. Multicriterion decision problems. Conflicting Objectives in Decisions (1977) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) 17–39Google Scholar
• Quade E. S.Analysis for Public Decisions (1989) (North-Holland, New York) Google Scholar
• Saaty T. L.The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1980) (McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York) Google Scholar
• Saaty T. L. Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Sci. (1986) 32:841–855Link, Google Scholar
• Saaty T. L. An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper “Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process.”. Management Sci. (1990) 36(3):259–268Link, Google Scholar
• Saaty T. L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Euro. J. Oper. Res. (1991a) 48:9–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saaty T. L. Rank and the controversy about the axioms of utility theory—a comparison of AHP and MAUT. Proc. 2nd Intern. Symposium of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (1991b) Pittsburgh, PA:87–111Google Scholar
• Saaty T. L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces (1994a) 24:19–43Link, Google Scholar
• Saaty T. L.Fundamentals of Decision Making (1994b) (RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA) Google Scholar
• Saaty T. L.Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback (1996) (RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA) Google Scholar
• Schoner B. S., Wedley B. W. Ambiguous criteria weights in AHP: consequences and solutions. Decision Sci. (1989) 20:462–475Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H., Radner C. B., Radner R. Theories of bounded rationality. Decision and Organization (1972) (North-Holland, Amsterdam) 161–176Google Scholar
• Straffin P. D.Game Theory and Strategy (1993) (The Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Stevens S. S. On the theory of scales of measurement. Science (1946) 103:677–680Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevens S. S. Measurement, statistics and the schemapiric view. Science (1968) 161(3844):849–856Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A. Intransitivity of Preferences. Psychological Review (1969) 76:31–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D., Bell D. E., Raiffa H., Tversky A. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriiptive Interactions (1988) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England) 167–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• United States Department of CommerceThe Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Award (1996) (Technology Administration, Gaithersberg, MD) Google Scholar
• Vazsonyi A. Multicriteria decision making. Decision Line (1995) December/January):13–14Google Scholar
• von Neumann J., Morgenstern O.Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1947) 2nd. ed.(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Watson S. R., Beude D. M.Decision Synthesis (1987) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England) Google Scholar
• Whyte L. L.Hierarchical Structures (1969) (American Elsevier, New York) Google Scholar
• Zeleny M.Multiple Criteria Decision Making (1982) (McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York) Google Scholar