An Illustrative Application of Idea (Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis) to a Korean Mobile Telecommunication Company

References

  • Ahn T., Charnes A., Cooper W. W. A note on the efficiency characterizations obtained in different DEA models. Socio-Economic Planning Sci. (1989) 22:253–257CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ali A. I., Cook W. D., Seiford L. M. Strict vs. weak ordinal relations for multipliers in data envelopment analysis. Management Sci. (1991) 37:733–738LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ali A. I., Seiford L. M., Fried H. O., Lovell C. A. K., Schmidt S. S. The mathematical programming approach to efficiency analysis. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ali A. I., Seiford L. M. Computational accuracy and infinitesimals in data envelopment analysis. (1989) . Technical Report, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Allen R., Athanassopoulos A., Dyson R. G., Thanassoulis E. Weight restrictions and value judgments in data envelopment analysis: evolution, development and future directions. Ann. Oper. Res. (1997) 73:13–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banker R. D., Morey R. C. Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Oper. Res. (1986) 34:513–521LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brockett P. L., Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Huang Z., Sun D. B. Data transformations in DEA cone-ratio approaches for monitoring bank performances. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 98:250–268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W. Preface to topics in data envelopment analysis. Ann. Oper. Res. (1985) 2:59–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Machol R. T., Tanner W. D., Alexander S. N. Elements of a strategy for making models in linear programming. System Engineering Handbook (1965) (McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W.Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming (1961) (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Huang Z. M., Sun D. B. Polyhedral coneratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks. J. Econometrics (1990a) 46:73–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Lewin A. Y., Seiford L. M.Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Application (1994) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1978) 2:429–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Zlobec S., Guddat J. Efficiency evaluations in perturbed data envelopment analysis. Parametric Optimization and Related Topics II (1990b) (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin) Google Scholar
  • Cook W. D., Kress M. A data envelopment model for aggregating preference rankings. Management Sci. (1990) 36:1302–1310LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cook W. D., Kress M., Seiford L. M. On the use of ordinal data in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1993) 44:133–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook W. D., Kress M., Seiford L. M. Data envelopment analysis in the presence of both quantitative and qualitative factors. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1996) 47:945–953CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper W. W., Park K. S., Pastor J. T. RAM: A range adjusted measure of efficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA. J. Productivity Anal. (1999a) 11:5–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper W. W., Park K. S., Yu G. IDEA and AR-IDEA: models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA. Management Sci. (1999b) 45:597–607LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper W. W., Park K. S., Yu G. IDEA (imprecise data envelopment analysis) with CMDs (column maximum decision making units). J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2001) 52:176–181CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper W. W., Thompson R. G., Thrall R. M. Introduction: extensions and new developments in DEA. Ann. Oper. Res. (1996) 66:3–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyson R. G., Thanassoulis E. Reducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1988) 39:563–576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Färe R., Grosskopf S., Lovell C. A. K.The Measurement of Productive Efficiency (1985) (Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing Co., Boston) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golany B. A note on including ordinal relations among multipliers in data envelopment analysis. Management Sci. (1988) 34:1029–1033LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lovell C. A. K., Pastor J. T. Units invariant and translation invariant DEA models. Oper. Res. Lett. (1995) 18:147–151CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roll Y., Cook W. D., Golany B. Controlling factor weights in data envelopment analysis. IIE Trans. (1991) 23:2–9CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roll Y., Golany B. Alternative methods of treating factor weights in DEA. Omega (1993) 21:99–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thanassoulis E., Allen R. Simulating weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis by means of unobserved DMUs. Management Sci. (1998) 44:586–594LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson R. G., Dharmapala P. S., Gatewood E. J., Macy S., Thrall R. M. DEA/assurance region SBDC efficiency and unique projections. Oper. Res. (1996) 44:533–542LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson R. G., Dharmapala P. S., Thrall R. M. Linked-cone DEA profit ratios and technical efficiency with an application to Illinois coal mines. Int. J. Prod. Econom. (1995) 39:99–115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson R. G., Langemeier L. N., Lee C.-T., Lee E., Thrall R. M. The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to kansas farming. J. Econometrics (1990) 46:93–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson R. G., Singleton F. D., Thrall R. M., Smith B. A. Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces (1986) 16:35–49LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson R. G., Thrall R. M., Cooper W. W., Whinston A. B. Polyhedral assurance regions with linked constraints. New Directions in Computational Economics (1994) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) 121–133CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thrall R. M. Duality, classification and slacks in DEA. Ann. Oper. Res. (1996) 66:109–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu G., Wei Q. L., Brockett P. L., Zhou L. Construction of all DEA efficient surfaces of the production possibility set under the generalized data envelopment analysis model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1996a) 95:491–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu G., Wei Q. L., Brockett P. L. A unification and extension of existing methods for efficiency analysis of decision making units. Ann. Oper. Res. (1996b) 66:47–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.