Alternative Models of Restructured Electricity Systems, Part 1: No Market Power

References

  • Boiteux M., Stasi P., Morlat G., Bessière F. Sur la détermination des prix de revient de développement dans un système interconnecté de production-distribution. Vingt-cinq ans d'économie électrique (1952) (Dunod, Paris) 361–400Document VI.10 du Congrès de Rome de l'UNIPEDEGoogle Scholar
  • Chan D., Pang J. S. The generalised quasi-variational inequality problem. Math. Oper. Res. (1982) 7:211–222LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chao H.-P., Peck S. A market mechanism for electric power transmission. J. Regulatory Econom. (1996) 10:25–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chao H.-P. An institutional design for an electricity contract market with central dispatch. Energy J. (1997) 18:85–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chao H.-P. Reliability management in competitive electricity markets. J. Regulatory Econom. (1998) 3:189–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daxhelet O., Smeers Y., Ferris M., Mangasarian O., Pang J.-S. Variational inequality models of restructured electricity systems. Complementarity: Applications, Algorithms and Extensions (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Daxhelet O., Smeers Y. Introducing reliability in models of competitive electricity systems. (2001) (Mimeo, CORE, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium) Google Scholar
  • Debreu G. A social equilibrium existence theorem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. (1952) 38:886–893CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harker P. T. Generalized Nash games and quasi-variational inequalities. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1991) 54:81–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harker P. T., Pang J. S. Finite-dimensional variational inequality and nonlinear complementarity problems: A survey of theory, algorithms and applications. Math. Programming (1990) 48B:161–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harvey S. M., Hogan W. W., Pope S. Transmission capacity reservations and transmission congestion contracts. (1997) . Available from http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/hepgGoogle Scholar
  • Hausker K. The politics and economics of auction design in the market for sulfur dioxide pollution. J. Policy Analysis and Management (1992) 11:553–572CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogan W. Contract networks for electric power transmission. J. Regulatory Econom. (1992) 4:211–242CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogan W., Cadwalader M. D., Harvey S. M., Pope S. L. Market coordination of transmission loading relief across multiple regions. (1998) . Available from http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/hepgGoogle Scholar
  • Hunt S., Shuttleworth G.Competition and choice in electricity (1996) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Joskow P., Schmalensee R., Bailey E. M. The market for sulfur dioxide emissions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998) 88:669–685Google Scholar
  • Oren S. S., Chao H.-P., Huntington H. Authority and responsibility of the ISO: objectives, options and tradeoffs. Designing Competitive Electricity Markets (1998) Kluwer's International SeriesCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oren S., Spiller P., Varaiya P., Wu F. Nodal prices and transmission rights: A critical appraisal. Electricity J. (1995) 8:24–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parkinson T., Einhorn M., Siddiqi R. Making bilateral competition work. Electricity Transmission Pricing and Technology (1996) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Rosen J. B. Existence and uniqueness of equilibrium points for concave n-person game. Econometrica (1965) 33:520–534CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmalensee R., Joskow P. L., Ellerman A. D., Montero J. P., Bailey E. M. An interim evaluation of sulfur dioxide emission trading. J. Econom. Perspective (1998) 12:53–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schweppe F. C., Caramanis M. C., Bohm R. E. The costs of wheeling and optimal wheeling rates. IEEE Trans. on Power System (1986) PWRS-1(1Google Scholar
  • Schweppe F. C., Caramanis M. C., Tabors R. E., Bohn R. E.Spot Pricing of Electricity (1988) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson R. B. Implementation of priority insurance in power exchange markets. Energy J. (1997) 18:111–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson R. B., Chao H.-P., Huntington H. Design principles. Designing Competitive Electricity Markets (1998) Kluwer's International SeriesCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu F., Varaiya P., Spiller P., Oren S. Folk theorems on transmission access: Proofs and counterexample. J. Regulatory Econom. (1996) 10:5–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.