High-Performance Computing for Asset-Liability Management

References

  • Ariyawansa K. A., Hudson D. D. Performance of a benchmark parallel implementation of the Van Slyke and Wets algorithm for two-stage stochastic programs on the sequent/balance. Concurrency: Practice and Experience (1991) 3:109–128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benders J. F. Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems. Numer. Math. (1962) 4:238–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsekas D. P., Tsitsiklis J. N.Parallel and Distributed Computations (1989) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Birge J. R. Decomposition and partitioning methods for multistage stochastic linear programs. Oper. Res. (1985) 33:989–1007LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Birge J. R., Louveaux F. A multicut algorithm for two-stage stochastic linear programs. Euro. J. Oper. Res. (1988) 34:384–392CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birge J. R., Louveaux F.Introduction to Stochastic Programming (1997) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
  • Birge J. R., Qi L. Computing block-angular Karmarkar projections with applications to stochastic programming. Management Sci. (1988) 34:1472–1479LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boender G. C. E. A hybrid simulation/optimisation scenario model for asset liability management. Euro. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 99:126–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradley S. P., Crane D. B. A dynamic model for bond portfolio management. Management Sci. (1972) 19:139–151LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brooke A., Kendrick D., Meeraus A.GAMS: A user's guide (1992) (The Scientific Press, Redwood City, Cal) Google Scholar
  • Carino D. R., Kent T., Myers D. H., Stacy C., Sylvanus M., Turner A. L., Watanabe K., Ziemba W. T. The Russel-Yasuda Kasai model: An asset liability model for a Japanese insurance company using multi-stage stochastic programming. Interfaces (1994) 24:29–49LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Consigli G., Dempster M. A. H. Dynamic stochastic programming for asset-liability management. Ann. Oper. Res. (1998) 81:131–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Czyzyk J., Fourer R., Mehrotra S. Using a massively parallel processor to solve large sparse linear programs by an interior-point method. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. (1998) 19:553–565CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fragnière E., Gondzio J., Vial J.-P. Building and solving large-scale stochastic programs on an affordable distributed computing system. Annals of Oper. Res. (2000) 99:167–187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geist A., Begelin A., Dongarra J., Jiang W., Mancheck R.PVM: Parallel Virtual Machine—A User's Guide and Tutorial for Networked Parallel Computing (1994) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gondzio J. HOPDM (version 2.12)—A fast LP solver based on a primal-dual interior point method. Euro. J. Oper. Res. (1995) 85:221–225CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gondzio J. Warm start of the primal-dual method applied in the cutting plane scheme. Math. Programming (1998) 83:125–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gondzio J., Sarkissian R. Column generation with a primal-dual method. (1996) . Logilab technical report 96.6, Department of Management Studies, University of Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  • Gondzio J., Vial J.-P. Warm start and Epsilon-subgradients in the cutting plane scheme for block-angular linear programs. Comput. Optim. Appl. (1999) 14:1–20Google Scholar
  • Høyland K., Wallace S. W. Generating scenario trees for multi-stage decision problems. Management Sci. (2001) 47:295–307LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jessup E. R., Yang D., Zenios S. A. Parallel factorization of structured matrices arising in stochastic programming. SIAM J. Optimiz. (1994) 4:833–846CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kall P., Wallace S. W.Stochastic Programming (1994) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England) Google Scholar
  • Kouwenberg R. Scenario generation and stochastic programming models for asset liability management. Euro. J. Oper. Res. (2001) 134:279–292CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kouwenberg R. LEQGEN: A C-tool for generating linear and quadratic programs, user's manual. (1999) . Working paper, Econometric Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  • Kusy M. I., Ziemba W. T. A bank asset and liability model. Oper. Res. (1986) 34:356–376LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mulvey J. M., Ruszczyński A. A new scenario decomposition method for large scale stochastic optimization. Oper. Res. (1995) 43:477–490LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mulvey J. M., Vladimirou H. Stochastic network programming for financial planning problems. Management Sci. (1992) 38:1642–1664LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mulvey J. M., Ziemba W. T., Mulvey J. M., Ziemba W. T. Asset and liability management systems for long-term investors: Discussion of the issues. Worldwide Asset and Liability Modelling (1998) (Cambridge University Press)3–38Google Scholar
  • Ruszczyński A. A regularized decomposition method for minimizing a sum of polyhedral functions. Math. Programming (1984) 33:309–333Google Scholar
  • Van Slyke R., Wets R. J. B. L-shaped linear programs with application to optimal control and stochastic programming. SIAM J. Appl. Math. (1969) 17:638–663CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vladimirou H., Zenios S. A., Migdalas S., Pardalos P., Storøy S. Parallel algorithms for large-scale stochastic programming. Parallel Computing in Optimization (1997) (Kluwer Academic Publishers)413–469CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang D., Zenios S. A. A scalable parallel interior point algorithm for stochastic linear programming and robust optimization. Comput. Optimiz. Appl. (1997) 7:143–158CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zenios S. A. Asset/liability management under uncertainty for fixed-income securities. Ann. Oper. Res. (1995) 59:77–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.