Efficient Portfolios, Sparse Matrices, and Entities: A Retrospective

References

• Arrow K. J., Debreu G., Malinvaud E., Solow R. M.Cowles Fiftieth Anniversary: Four Essays and an Index of Publications (1991) (Yale University Printing Service, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
• Bellman R. E.Dynamic Programming (1957) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Dantzig G. B., Koopmans T. C. Maximization of a linear function of variables subject to linear inequalities. Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation (1951) (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York) 339–347Google Scholar
• Dantzig G. B.Linear Programming and Extensions (1963) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dexter A. S., Yu J. N. W., Ziemba W. T., Dempster M. A. H. Portfolio selection in a lognormal market when the investor has a power utility function: Computational results. Stochastic Programming (1980) (Academic Press, New York) 507–523Google Scholar
• Duff I. S.Sparse Matrices and Their Uses (1981) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Graham B., Dodd D. L.Security Analysis (1951) 3rd ed.(McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York) Google Scholar
• Hlawitschka Walter. The empirical nature of Taylor-series approximations to expected utility. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1994) 84(3):713Google Scholar
• Kiviat P. J., Villanueva R., Markowitz H. M.The SIMSCRIPT II Programming Language (1969) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Koopmans T. C., Koopmans T. C. Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation (1951) 7th ed.(Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
• Kroll Y., Levy H., Markowitz H. M. Mean variance versus direct utility maximization. J. Finance (1984) 39(1):47–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn H. W., Tucker A. W., Neyman J. Nonlinear programming. Proc. Second Berkeley Sympos. on Math. Statist. Probab. (1951) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) 481–492Google Scholar
• Lemke C. E. Bimatrix equilibrium points and mathematical programming. Management Sci. (1965) 11(7):681–689Link, Google Scholar
• Leontief W.The Structure of American Economy (1951) (Oxford University Press, New York) 1919–1931Google Scholar
• Levy H., Markowitz H. M. Approximating expected utility by a function of mean and variance. Amer. Econ. Rev. (1979) 69(3):308–317Google Scholar
• Malhotra A., Markowitz H. M., Pazel D. P. EAS-E; an integrated approach to application development. ACM Trans. Database Systems (1983) 8(4):515–542Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manne A. S., Markowitz H. M.Studies in Process Analysis: Economywide Production Capabilities (1963) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Markowitz H. M. Portfolio selection. J. Finance (1952) 7(1):77–91Google Scholar
• Markowitz H. M., Barna T. Industry-wide, multi-industry and economy-wide process analysis. The Structural Interdependence of the Economy (1954) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Markowitz H. M. The optimization of a quadratic function subject to linear constraints. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. (1956) 3:111–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markowitz H. M. The elimination form of the inverse and its application to linear programming. Management Sci. (1957) 3:255–269Link, Google Scholar
• Markowitz H. M.Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments (1959) 2nd ed.(Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Markowitz H. M., Belzer J., Holzman A. G., Kent A. SIMSCRIPT. Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology (1979) 13(Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Markowitz H. M.Mean-Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital Markets (1987) (Basil Blackwell Ltd., Oxford, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Markowitz H. M., Peter Todd. Mean-Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital Markets (2000) . With Chapter 13 by G. Peter Todd. First published in 1987 by Basil Blackwell. Revised reissue by Frank Fabozzi and Associates, New Hope, PAGoogle Scholar
• Markowitz H. M., Hausner B., Karr H.SIMSCRIPT: A Simulation Programming Language (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Markowitz H. M., Malhotra A., Pazel A. The EAS-E application development system: Principles and language summary. Comm. Assoc. Comput. Mach. (1984) 27(8):785–799Google Scholar
• Markowitz H. M., Reid D., Tew B. The value of a blank check. J. Portfolio Management (1994) 20(4):82–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pazel D. P., Malhotra A., Markowitz H. M. The system architecture of EAS-E: An integrated programming and data base language. IBM Systems J. (1983) 22(3):188–198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perold A. Large-scale portfolio optimization. Management Sci. (1984) 30(10):1143–1160Link, Google Scholar
• Pulley L. M. A general mean-variance approximation to expected utility for short holding periods. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1981) 16:361–373Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pulley L. M. Mean-Variance approximations to expected logarithmic utility. Oper. Res. (1983) 31(4):685–696Link, Google Scholar
• Rose D. J., Willoughby R. A.Sparse Matrices and Their Applications. Proc. Sympos. IBM Res. Center (1972) (Plenum Press, New York) . September 9-10, 1971Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage L. J.The Foundations of Statistics (1954) 2nd ed.(Wiley, New York) . Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Sharpe W. F. A simplified model for portfolio analysis. Management Sci. (1963) IX(2):277–293Link, Google Scholar
• Swain J. J. Power tools for visualization and decision-making. OR/MS Today (2001) 28(1):52–63Google Scholar
• Von Neumann J., Morgenstern O.Theory of Games and Economic behavior (1944) 3rd ed.(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Wiesenberger A.Investment Companies (1941) (Annual editions since 1941, New York) . CompanyGoogle Scholar
• Williams J. B.The Theory of Investment Value (1938) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Willoughby R. A.Proc. Sympos. Sparse Matrices Their Appl. (1969) . IBM Report RAI (No. 11707). Yorktown Heights, NYGoogle Scholar
• Young W. E., Trent R. H. Geometric mean approximation of individual security and portfolio performance. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1969) 4(June):179–199Crossref, Google Scholar