Crime Modeling1

References

  • Avi-Itzhak Benjamin, Shinnar Reuel. Quantitative models in crime control. J. Criminal Justice (1973) 1(3):185–217CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett Arnold, Caulkins Jonathan P., Maltz Michael D., Gass Saul I., Harris Carl M. Crime and justice. Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science (2000) 2nd ed.(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Barnett Arnold, Essenfeld E., Kleitman Daniel J. Urban homicide: Some recent developments. J. Criminal Justice (1980) 8:379–385CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett Arnold, Kleitman Daniel, Larson Richard. On urban homicide: A statistical analysis. J. Criminal Justice (1975) 3:85–110Urban violence and risk to the individualCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blumstein Alfred, Cohen Jacqueline. A theory of the stability of punishment. J. Criminal Law, Criminology Police Sci. (1973) 63(2):198–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blumstein Alfred, Cohen Jacqueline. Estimation of individual crime rates from arrest records. J. Criminal Law Criminology (1979) 70(4):561–585CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blumstein Alfred, Cohen Jacqueline. Characterizing criminal careers. Science (1987) 237:985–991CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blumstein Alfred, Cohen Jacqueline. Estimating the duration of adult criminal careers. Proc. Internat. Statist. Inst. Annual Meeting (1995) Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  • Blumstein Alfred, Graddy Elizabeth. Prevalence and recidivism in index arrests: A feedback model approach. Law Society Rev. (1982) 16(2):265–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blumstein Alfred, Larson Richard. Models of the total criminal justice system. Oper. Res. (1969) 17(2):199–232LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blumstein Alfred, Nagin Daniel. On the optimum use of incarceration for crime control. Oper. Res. (1978) 26(3):381–403LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blumstein Alfred, Wallman Joel. The Crime Drop in America (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England) Google Scholar
  • Blumstein Alfred, Belkin Jacob, Glass William. JUSSIM, an interactive computer program for analysis of criminal justice systems. (1971) (Report of the Urban Systems Institute, School of Urban and Public Affairs, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA)Google Scholar
  • Blumstein Alfred, Canela-Cacho José, Cohen Jacqueline. Filtered sampling from populations with heterogeneous event frequencies. Management Sci. (1993) 39(7):886–899LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blumstein Alfred, Cohen Jacqueline, Miller Harold. Demographically disaggregated projections of prison populations. J. Criminal Justice (1980) 8(1):1–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blumstein Alfred, Cohen Jacqueline, Nagin Daniel. The dynamics of a homeostatic punishment process. J. Criminal Law Criminology (1976) 67(3):317–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blumstein Alfred, Cohen Jacqueline, Nagin Daniel. Deterrence and incapacitation: Estimating the effects of criminal sanctions on crime rates. (1978) (National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.) . Report of the Panel on Research on Deterrent and Incapacitative EffectsGoogle Scholar
  • Blumstein Alfred, Cohen Jacqueline, Martin Susan, Tonry Michael. Research on sentencing: The search for reform. (1983) (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.) . Report of the Panel on Research on SentencingGoogle Scholar
  • Blumstein Alfred, Cohen Jacqueline, Roth Jeffrey, Visher Christy A. Criminal careers and “career criminals”. (1986) (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.) . Report of the National Academy of Sciences Panel on Research on Criminal CareersGoogle Scholar
  • Canela-Cacho José A., Blumstein Alfred, Cohen Jacqueline. Relationship between the offending frequency (λ) of imprisoned and free offenders. Criminology (1997) 35(1):133–175CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaiken Jan, Chaiken Marcia. Varieties of criminal behavior. (1982) (Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA) . Rand Report No. R-2814-NIJGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen Ronald. Projected percentage of U.S. population with criminal arrest and conviction records. Task Force Report: Science and Technology (1967) (Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.) 216–228Appendix JGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen Jacqueline, Blumstein Alfred, Cohen Jacqueline, Roth Jeffrey, Visher Christy A. Research on criminal careers: Individual frequency rates and offense seriousness. Criminal Careers and “Career Criminals,” (1986) (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.) . Appendix B, Report of the National Academy of Sciences Panel on Research on Criminal CareersGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen Jacqueline, Fields Kenneth, Lettre Michel, Stafford Richard, Walker Claire. J. Res. Crime Delinquency (1973) 10(3):117–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrlich Isaac. Participation in illegitimate activities: A theoretical and empirical investigation. J. Political Econom. (1973) 81(3):521–565CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrlich Isaac. The deterrent effect of capital punishment: A question of life and death. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1975) 65(3):397–417Google Scholar
  • Farrington David P. The prevalence of conviction. British J. Criminology (1981) 21:173–175CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood Peter W., Abrahamse Allen. Selective incapacitation. (1982) (Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA) . Rand Report No. R-2815-NIJGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood Peter W., Turner Susan. Selective incapacitation revisited: Why the high-rate offenders are hard to predict. (1987) (Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA) . Rand Report No. R-3397-NIJGoogle Scholar
  • Maltz Michael D.Recidivism (1984) (Academic Press, Orlando, FL) Google Scholar
  • Maltz Michael D., Pollock S. M., Rothkopf M. H., Barnett A. Operations research in studying crime and justice: Its history and accomplishments. Operations Research and the Public Sector (1994) (North-Holland, Amsterdam and New York)CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Navarro Joseph A., Taylor Jean G. Data analyses and simulation of court system in the District of Columbia for the processing of felony defendants. (1967) (Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.) 199–215Appendix I, Task Force Report: Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  • President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of JusticeTask Force Report: Science and Technology (1967a) (Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
  • President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of JusticeThe Challenge of Crime in a Free Society (1967b) (Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
  • Rolph John, Chaiken Jan M., Houchens Robert L. Methods for estimating crime rates of individuals. (1981) (Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA) . Rand Report No. R-2730-NIJGoogle Scholar
  • Tragler Gernot, Caulkins Jonathan, Feichtinger Gustav. Optimal dynamic allocation of treatment and enforcement in illicit drug control. Oper. Res. (2001) 49(3):352–362LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.