Perspectives on the Evolution of Simulation

References

  • Adam N., Dogramaci A.Current Issues in Simulation (1979) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Alexopoulos C., Seila A. F., Joines J. A., Barton R. R., Kang K., Fishwick P. A. Output analysis for simulations. Proc. 2000 Winter Simulation Conf. (2000) (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ) 101–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Araten M., Hixson H. G., Hoggatt A. C., Kiviat P. J., Morris M. F., Ockene A., Reitman J., Sussman J. M., Wilson J. R., Swain J., Goldsman D., Crain R., Wilson J. The winter simulation conference: Perspectives of the founding fathers. Proc. 1992 Winter Simulation Conf. (1992) (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ) 37–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balci O., Sargent R. G. Bibliography of validation of simulation models. Newsletter—TIMS College on Simulation and Gaming (1980) 4(2):11–15Google Scholar
  • Balci O., Sargent R. G. A methodology for cost-risk analysis in the statistical validation of simulation models. Comm. ACM (1981) 24(4):190–197CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barton R. R., Medeiros D. J., Watson E. F., Carson J. S., Manivannan M. S. Simulation metamodels. Proc. 1998 Winter Simulation Conf. (1998) (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ) 167–174CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechhofer R. E., Santner T. J., Goldsman D.Design and Analysis of Experiments for Statistical Selection, Screening and Multiple Comparisons (1995) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bell P. C., O'Keefe R. M., Balci O. Visual Interactive Simulation: A methodological perspective. Annals of Operations Research, Volume 53: Simulation and Modeling (1994) (J. C. Baltzer AG, Science Publishers, Basel, Switzerland) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bergin J. T., Gibson R. G.History of Programming Languages-II (1996) (ACM Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonini Charles P.Simulation of Information and Decision Systems in the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Bryant R. E. Simulation of packet communication architecture computer systems. (1977) (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA) . M.S. thesis. MIT Lab of Computer Science, Technical Report MIT-LCS-TR-188Google Scholar
  • Cellier F. E.Progress in Modelling and Simulation (1982) (Academic Press, London, U.K) Google Scholar
  • Chandy K. M., Misra J. Distributed simulation: A case study in design and verification of distributed programs. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1979) SE-5(5):440–452CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chick S. E., Joines J. A., Barton R. R., Kang K., Fishwick P. A. Bayesian methods for simulation. Proc. 2000 Winter Simulation Conf. (2000) (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ) 109–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Churchman C. West, Hoggatt A. C., Balderston F. E. An analysis of the concept of simulation. Symposium on Simulation Models (1963) (South-Western Publishing Co., Cincinnati, OH) Google Scholar
  • Conway R. W. Some tactical problems in digital simulation. Management Sci (1963) 10(1):47–61LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cosby L. N. SIMNET: An insider's perspective, IDA Document D-1661, Institute for Defense Analyses. (1995) (Defense Technical Information Center, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
  • Cota B. A., Sargent R. G. Control flow graphs: A method of model representation for parallel discrete event simulation. (1990) . CASE Center Technical Report No. 9026, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NYGoogle Scholar
  • Cota B. A., Fritz D. G., Sargent R. G., Tew J. D., Manivannan M. S., Sadowski D. A., Seila A. F. Control flow graphs as a representation language. Proc. 1994 Winter Simulation Conf. (1994) (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ) 555–559CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crain R. C., Henriksen J. O., Roberts S. D., Schriber T. J., Susman J. M., Swain J., Goldsman D., Crain R., Wilson J. The winter simulation conference: Celebrating twenty-five years in progress. Proc. 1992 Winter Simulation Conf. (1992) (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ) 37–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devroye L.Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation (1986) (Springer-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Efron B.The Jackknife, the Bootstrap, and Other Resampling Plans (1982) (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Efron B., Tibshirani R. J.An Introduction to the Bootstrap (1993) (Chapman & Hall, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans G. W., Wallace G. F., Sutherland G. L. Simulation Using Digital Computers (1967) (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Feigenbaum E. A., Feldman J.Computers and Thought (1963) (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York) Google Scholar
  • Forrester J. W.Industrial Dynamics (1961) (The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Fritz D. G., Sargent R. G., Alexopoulos C., Kang K., Lilegon W. R., Goldsman D. An overview of hierarchical control flow graph models. Proc. 1995 Winter Simulation Conf. (1995) (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ) 1347–1355CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fujimoto R. M. Guest editor. ORSA J. Comput. (1993) 5(3Google Scholar
  • Glynn P. W. A GSMP formalism for discrete event systems. Proc. IEEE. (1989) 77(1):14–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldsman D., Nelson B. L., Banks J. Comparing systems via simulation. The Handbook of Simulation (1998) (John Wiley, New York) 273–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guetzkow H., Kotler P., Schultz R. L.Simulation in Social and Administrative Science—Overviews and Case-Examples (1972) (Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Haas P. J. On simulation output analysis for generalized semi-Markov processes. Comm. Statist.—Stochastic Models (1999) 15(1):53–80CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hammersley J. M., Handscomb D. C.Monte Carlo Methods (1964) (Methuen & Co. LTD, London, U.K) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hartson H. R. Human-computer interaction: Interdisciplinary roots and trends. J. Systems and Software (1998) 48:103–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jansson Birger. Random Number Generators (1966) (Victor Pettersons, Stockholm, Sweden) 15Google Scholar
  • Jefferson D., Sowizral H. Fast and concurrent simulation using the time warp mechanism, part I: Local control. (1982) (RAND Report N-1906-AF, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA) Google Scholar
  • Kiviat P. J. Digital computer simulation: Computer programming languages. (1969) (RAND Memo RM-5883-PR, RAND Corp., Santa Monica, CA) Google Scholar
  • Kiviat P. J., Villanueva R., Markowitz H. M.SIMSCRIPT II Programming Language (1968) (Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs,NJ) Google Scholar
  • Kleijnen J. P. C.Statistical Techniques in Simulation: Part II (1975) (Marcel Dekker Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Kleijnen J. P. C., Sargent R. G. A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2000) 120:14–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knuth D. E.The Art of Computer Programming/Volume : Semi-Numerical Algorithms (1997) 23rd ed.(Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Krasnow H. S., Hollingsdale S. H. Dynamic representation in discrete interaction simulation languages. Digital Simulation in Operational Research (1967) (American Elsevier Publishing Company, Inc., New York) 77–92Google Scholar
  • Lackner M. R. Toward a general simulation capability. Proc. 1962 Spring Joint Comput. Conf. (1962) (American Federation of Information Processing Societies, Montvale, NJ) 1–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lackner M. R. Digital simulation and system theory. (1964) (SDC Document SP-1612 System Development Corp., Santa Monica, CA) Google Scholar
  • Law A. M., Kelton W. D.Simulation Modeling and Analysis, Third Ed. (2000) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • L'Ecuyer P., Banks J. Random number generation. Handbook on Simulation (1998) (John Wiley, New York) 93–137Available at 〈 http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/˜lecuyer/〉 〈 myftp/papers/handsim.ps〉 (accessed October 30, 2001)CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • L'Ecuyer P., Peters B. A., Smith J. S., Rohrer M. W., Medeiros D. J. Software for uniform random number generation: Distinguishing the good and the bad. Proc. 2001 Winter Simulation Conf. (2001) (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ) 95–105Available at 〈 http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/˜lecuyer/〉 〈 myftp/papers/handsim.ps〉 (accessed October 30, 2001)CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lehmer D. H. Mathematical Methods in Large-Scale Computing Units. (1951) 26(Ann. Comput. Lab. Harvard Univ.)141–146Google Scholar
  • Licklider J. C. R., Shapiro G., Rogers M. Interactive dynamic modeling. Prospects for Simulation and Simulators of Dynamic Systems (1967) (Spartan Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • McCormack W. M., Sargent R. G. Analysis of future event set algorithms for discrete event simulation. Comm. ACM. (1981) 24(12):801–812CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mealy G. H. Another look at data. Proc. 1967 Fall Joint Comput. Conf. (1967) 31(American Federation of Information Processing Societies, Montvale, NJ) 525–534CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nance R. E. On time flow mechanisms for discrete system simulation. Management Sci (1971) 18(1):59–73LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nance R. E., Adam N., Dogramaci A. Model representation in discrete event simulation: Prospects for developing documentation standards. Current Issues in Computer Simulation (1979) (Academic Press, New York) 83–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nance R. E. The time and state relationships in simulation modeling. Comm. ACM. (1981) 24(4):173–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nance R. E., Roberts S. D., Banks J., Schmeiser B. A tutorial view of simulation model development. Proc. 1983 Winter Simulation Conf. (1983) (Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Piscataway, NJ) 325–331Google Scholar
  • Nance R. E., Bergin T. J., Gibson R. G. A history of discrete event simulation programming languages. History of Programming Languages—II (1996) (ACM Press, New York) 369–427CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Naylor T. H.Computer Simulation Experiments with Models of Economic Systems (1971) (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Naylor T. H., Balintfy J. L., Burdick D. S., Chu K.Computer Simulation Techniques (1966) (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Naylor T. H., Finger J. M. Verification of computer simulation models. Management Sci (1967) 14(10):92–101LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nygaard K. Personal communication during the ACM SIGPLAN History of Programming Languages Conference. (1978) June(Los Angeles, CA)1–3Google Scholar
  • O'Keefe R. M. Personal comment during an open discussion following a technical session at 1986 Winter Simulation Conference. (1986) December(Washington, D.C)8–10Google Scholar
  • Peacock J. K., Wong J. W., Manning E. G. Distributed simulation using a network of processors. Comput. Networks (1979) 3(1):44–56Google Scholar
  • Pritsker A. B.The GASP IV Simulation Language (1974) (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Reitman J., Ingerman D., Katzke J., Shapiro J., Siman K., Smith B. A complete interactive simulation environment: GPSS/360-NORDEN. Proc. Fourth Conf. Appl. Simulation. (1970) (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ) 260–270Google Scholar
  • Sargent R. G., Highland H. J., Spiegel M. G., Shannon R. E. Validation of simulation models. Proc. 1979 Winter Simulation Conf. (1979) (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ) 497–503Google Scholar
  • Sargent R. G., Cellier F. E. Verification and validation of simulation models. Progress in Modelling and Simulation (1981) (Academic Press, London, U.K) Google Scholar
  • Sargent R. G. Event graph modelling for simulation with an application to flexible manufacturing systems. Management Sci (1988) 34(10):1231–1251LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sargent R. G., Kang K., Goldsman D. An investigation of finite-sample behavior of confidence interval estimators. Oper. Res. (1992) 40(5):898–913LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schruben L. Simulation modeling with event graphs. Comm. ACM. (1983) 26(11):957–963CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shanthikumar J. G., Sargent R. G. A unifying view of hybrid simulation/analytic models and modeling. Oper. Res. (1983) 31(16):1030–1052LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro G., Rogers M.Prospects for Simulation and Simulators of Dynamic Systems (1967) (Spartan Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Siegel A. I., Wolf J. J.Man-Machine Simulation Models—Psychosocial and Performance Interaction (1969) (John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Som T. K., Sargent R. G. A formal development of event graphs as an aid to structured and efficient simulation programs. ORSA J. Comput (1989) 1(2):107–125LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tocher K. D.The Art of Simulation (1963) (The English Universities Press LTD, London, U.K) Google Scholar
  • Tocher K. D., Owen D. G. The automatic programming of simulations. Proc. Second Internat. Conf. Oper. Res. (1960) 50–68Google Scholar
  • U.S. General Accounting OfficeAdvantages and Limitations of Computer Simulation in Decision Making (1973) (Washington, D.C). B-163074Google Scholar
  • U.S. General Accounting OfficeWays to Improve Management of Federally Funded Computerized Models (1976) (Washington, D.C). LCD-75-111Google Scholar
  • Wilson J. R., Goldsman D. Alan Pritsker's multifaceted career: Theory, practice, education, entrepreneurship, and service. IIE Trans (2001) 33(3):139–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeigler B. P. Towards a formal theory of modelling and simulation: Structure preserving morphisms. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach (1972) 19(4):742–764CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeigler B. P.Theory of Modelling and Simulation (1976) (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.