Game Theory and Operations Research: Some Musings 50 Years Later
Published Online:1 Feb 2002https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.50.1.192.17789
References
- Studies of War (1962) (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, Scotland) Google Scholar
- The War Game (1979) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
- Operations research trajectories: The Anglo-American experience from the 1940s to the 1990s. Oper. Res. (2000) 48(5):661–670Link, Google Scholar
- Methods of Operations Research (1970) (Peninsula Publishing, Los Altos, CA) Google Scholar
- OR/MS publications: Extension of the analysis of U.S. flagship journals to the United Kingdom. Oper. Res. (2000) 45(2):178–187Link, Google Scholar
- Ten years of the OR practice section. Oper. Res. (1994) 47(1):31–33Link, Google Scholar
- Game theory and operations research. J. Res. Soc. Amer. (1953a) 1:152Google Scholar
- Non-cooperative games and economic theory. Conference on the Theory of N-Person Games (1953b) March):20–23Google Scholar
- The role of game theory in economics. Kyklos (1953c) 7(2):21Crossref, Google Scholar
- Readings in Game Theory and Political Behavior (1954) (Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
- The uses of game theory in management science. Management Sci. (1955) 2(1):40–54Link, Google Scholar
- A game theorist looks at the antitrust laws and the automobile industry. Stanford Law Rev. (1956) 8(4):594–630Crossref, Google Scholar
- Economics and operations research: A symposium. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1958a) 40(3):214–220Crossref, Google Scholar
- Simulation of the firm. J. Indust. Engrg. (1958b) IX(5):391–392Google Scholar
- Studies and theories of decision making. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1958c) 289–306Crossref, Google Scholar
- Games for Society, Business and War (1975) (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
- What is an application and when is theory a waste of time? Management Sci. (1988) 33:12Google Scholar
- Evolution of a “science of managing” in America. Management Sci. (1954) 1:1–31Link, Google Scholar
- (1989) . The next decade in operations research: Comments on the CONDOR reportGoogle Scholar

