Efficient Algorithms for the Inverse Spanning-Tree Problem

References

  • Ahuja R. K., Orlin J. B. A faster algorithm for the inverse spanning tree problem. J. Algorithms (2000) 34:177–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja R. K., Hochbaum D. S., Orlin J. B., Cornuejols G., Burkard R. E., Woeginger G. J. Solving the convex cost integer dual network flow problem. Proc. IPCO&99. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (1999a) 1610:31–44ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja R. K., Hochbaum D. S., Orlin J. B. A cut based algorithm for the convex dual of the minimum cost network flow problem. (1999b) . Manuscript, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja R. K., Orlin J. B., Stein C., Tarjan R. E. Improved algorithms for bipartite network flow. SIAM J. Comput. (1994) 23:906–933CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barlow R. E., Bartholomew D. J., Bremer J. M., Brunk H. D.Statistical Inference Under Order Restrictions (1972) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dinic E. A. Algorithm for solution of a problem of maximal flow in a network with power estimation. Soviet Math. Dokl. (1970) 11:1277–1280Google Scholar
  • Even S., Tarjan R. E. Network flow and testing graph connectivity. SIAM J. Comput. (1975) 4:507–518CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallo G., Grigoriadis M. D., Tarjan R. E. A fast parametric maximum flow algorithm and applications. SIAM J. Comput. (1989) 18:30–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldberg A. V., Tarjan R. E. A new approach to the maximum flow problem. J. ACM (1988) 35:921–940CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gusfield D., Martel C., Fernandez-Baca D. Fast algorithms for bipartite network flow. SIAM J. Comput. (1987) 16:237–251CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hochbaum D. S. Lower and upper bounds for allocation problems. Math. Oper. Res. (1994) 19:390–409LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hochbaum D. S. The pseudoflow algorithm for the maximum flow problem. (1997) . Manuscript, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Hochbaum D. S., Queyranne M. The convex cost closure problem. SIAM J. Discrete Math. (2003) 16:192–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hochbaum D. S., Shanthikumar J. G. Convex separable optimization is not much harder than linear optimization. J. ACM (1990) 37:843–862CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Picard J. C. Maximal closure of a graph and applications to combinatorial problems. Management Sci. (1976) 22:1268–1272LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sleator D. D., Tarjan R. E. A data structure for dynamic trees. J. Comput. Systems Sci. (1983) 24:362–391CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sokkalingam P. T., Ahuja R., Orlin J. B. Solving inverse spanning tree problems through network flow techniques. Oper. Res. (1999) 47:291–298LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tarantola A.Inverse Problem Theory: Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation (1987) (Elsevier, Amsterdam The Netherlands) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.