Using Ranking and Selection to “Clean Up” after Simulation Optimization

References

  • Andradóttir S., Banks J. Simulation optimization. Handook of Simulation: Principles, Methodology, Advances, Applications, and Practice (1998) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) . Chapter 9CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banks J., Carson J. S., Nelson B. L., Nicol D. M.Discrete Event System Simulation (2001) 3rd ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Bazaraa M. S., Sherali H. D., Shetty C. M.Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms (1993) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bechhofer R. E., Santner T. J., Goldsman D.Design and Analysis for Statistical Selection, Screening and Multiple Comparisons (1995) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Benson D., Andradóttir S., Healy K. J., Withers D. H., Nelson B. L. Simulation modeling and optimization using ProModel. Proc. 1997 Winter Simulation Conf. (1997) 587–593CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boesel J., Joines J. A., Barton R. R., Kang K., Fishwick P. A. Adaptively choosing the best procedure for selecting the best system. Proc. 2000 Winter Simulation Conf. (2000) 537–543CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boesel J., Nelson B. L., Ishii N. A framework for simulation-optimization software. IIE Trans. (2003) 35(3):221–229CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen C-H. A lower bound for the correct subset-selection probability and its application to discrete-event simulations. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control (1996) 41(8):1227–1331CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chick S. E., Inoue K. New two-stage and sequential procedures for selecting the best simulated system. Oper. Res. (2001) 49:732–743LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dai L. Convergence properties of ordinal optimization comparison in simulation of discrete event dynamic systems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (1996) 91:363–388CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fu M. C. Optimization for simulation: Theory vs. practice. INFORMS J. Comput. (2002) 14(3):192–215LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fu M. C., Andradóttir S., Carson J. S., Glover F., Harrell C. R., Ho Y. C., Kelly J. P., Robinson S. M., Joines J. A., Barton R. R., Kang K., Fishwick P. A. Integrating optimization and simulation: Research and practice. Proc. 2000 Winter Simulation Conf. (2000) 610–616CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glover F., Kelly J. P., Laguna M., Charnes J. M., Morrice D. J., Brunner D. T., Swain J. J. New advances and applications of combining simulation and optimization. Proc. 1996 Winter Simulation Conf. (1996) 144–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inoue K., Chick S. E., Chen C-H. An empirical evaluation of several methods to select the best system. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simulation (1999) 9:381–407CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson B. L., Goldsman D. Comparisons with a standard in simulation experiments. Management Sci. (2001) 47:449–463LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson B. L., Matejcik F. J. Using common random numbers for indifference-zone selection and multiple comparisons in simulation. Management Sci. (1995) 41:1935–1945LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson B. L., Swann J., Goldsman D., Song W. Simple procedures for selecting the best simulated system when the number of alternatives is large. Oper. Res. (2001) 49:950–963LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rinott Y. On two-stage selection procedures and related probability-inequalities. Comm. Statist.—Theory and Methods (1978) A7:799–811CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yakowitz S., L'Ecuyer P., Vazquez-Abad F. Global stochastic optimization with low-dispersion point sets. Oper. Res. (2000) 48:939–950LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.