Formal and Informal Control as Complement or Substitute? The Role of the Task Environment

References

• Abernethy MA, Brownell P (1997) Management control systems in research and development organizations: The role of accounting, behavior and personnel controls. Accounting Organ. Soc. 22(3–4):233–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Beaty JC, Boik RJ, Pierce CA (2005) Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. J. Appl. Psych. 90(1):94–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association (1985) Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. 14(3):396–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur JB (1994) Effects of human-resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Acad. Management J. 37(3):670–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashby WR (1956) An Introduction to Cybernetics (Chapman & Hall, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Auh S, Mengue B (2007) Performance implications of the direct and moderating effects of centralization and formalization on customer orientation. Indust. Marketing Management 36(8):1022–1034.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker G, Gibbons R, Murphy KJ (1999) Informal authority in organizations. J. Law Econom. Organ. 15(1):56–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker G, Gibbons R, Murphy KJ (2002) Relational contracts and the theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):39–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnard CI (1938) The Functions of the Executive (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bascle G (2008) Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 6(3):285–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum CF, Schaffer ME, Stillman S (2002) IVENDOG: Stata Module to Calculate Durbin-Wu-Hausman Endogeneity Test After Ivreg. Boston College Department of Economics, Boston. Accessed August 4, 2013, http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s429401.html.Google Scholar
• Bello DC, Gilliland DI (1997) The effect of output controls, process controls, and flexibility on export channel performance. J. Marketing 61(1):22–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1955) The Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Study of Interpersonal Relations in Two Government Agencies (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Bliese PD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Klein KK, Kozlowski SWJ, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 349–381.Google Scholar
• Bollen KA, Long JS (1993) Introduction. Bollen KA, Long JS, eds. Testing Structural Equation Models (Sage, London), 1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonner JM, Ruekert RW, Walker OC (2002) Upper management control of new product development projects and project performance. J. Product Innovation Management 19(3):233–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brenner B, Ambos B (2013) A question of legitimacy? A dynamic perspective on multinational firm control. Organ. Sci. 24(3):773–795.Link, Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA (1983) A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28(2):223–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgers JH, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2008) Why new business development projects fail: Coping with the differences of technological versus market knowledge. Long Range Planning 41(1):55–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardinal LB (2001) Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organ. Sci. 12(1):19–36.Link, Google Scholar
• Cardinal LB, Miller CC, Palich LE (2011) Breaking the cycle of iteration: Forensic failures of international diversification and firm performance research. Global Strategy J. 1(1–2):175–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardinal LB, Sitkin SB, Long CP (2004) Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organ. Sci. 15(4):411–431.Link, Google Scholar
• Cardinal LB, Sitkin SB, Long CP (2010) A configurational theory of control. Sitkin SB, Cardinal LB, Bijlsma-Frankema K, eds. Organizational Control (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 51–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Busenbark JR, Woo H-S, Semadeni M (2016) Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management J., ePub ahead of print February 9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.2475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay P, Glick WH, Huber GP (2001) Organizational actions in response to threats and opportunities. Acad. Management J. 44(5):937–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. 32(5):554–571.Link, Google Scholar
• Danneels E (2002) The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management J. 23(12):1095–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davidson R, Mackinnon J (1983) Estimation and Interference in Economics (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Davila T (2000) An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems’ design in new product development. Accounting Organ. Soc. 25(4–5):383–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawson JF, Richter AW (2006) Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. J. Appl. Psych. 91(4):917–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Jong BA, Bijlsma-Frankema KM, Cardinal LB (2014) Stronger than the sum of its parts? The performance implications of peer control combinations in teams. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1703–1721.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1985) Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Sci. 31(2):134–149.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt EM, Sull DN (2001) Strategy as simple rules. Harvard Bus. Rev. 79(1):106–116.Google Scholar
• Greenbaum RL, Mawritz MB, Piccolo RF (2015) When leaders fail to “Walk the Talk”: Supervisor undermining and perceptions of leader hypocrisy. J. Management 41(3):929–956.Google Scholar
• Gupta AK, Smith KG, Shalley CE (2006) The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. 49(4):693–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagel J, Brown JS, Jelinek M (2010) Relational networks, strategic advantage: Collaborative control is fundamental. Sitkin SB, Cardinal L, Bijlsma-Frankema K, eds. Organizational Control (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 251–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (2009) Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Geletkanycz MA, Fredrickson JW (1993) Top executive commitment to the status-quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management J. 14(6):401–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA (2003) Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 1(1):51–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen LP (1982) Large sample properties of generalized-method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50(4):1029–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM (1995) Evaluating model fit. Hoyle RH, ed. Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 76–99.Google Scholar
• Jackson SE, Schuler RS, Rivero JC (1989) Organizational characteristics as predictors of personnel practices. Personnel Psych. 42(4):727–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. 69(1):85–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jenkins GD, Mitra A, Gupta N, Shaw JD (1998) Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. J. Appl. Psych. 83(5):777–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Piccolo RF (2004) Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. J. Appl. Psych. 89(5):755–768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr S, Jermier JM (1978) Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 22(3):375–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirsch LJ, Choudhury V (2010) Toward a theory of relational control: How relationship structure influences the choice of control. Sitkin SB, Cardinal LB, Bijlsma-Frankema K, eds. Organizational Control (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 301–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirsch LJ, Ko D-G, Haney MH (2010) Investigating the antecedents of team-based clan control: Adding social capital as a predictor. Organ. Sci. 21(2):469–489.Link, Google Scholar
• Kreutzer M, Lechner C (2010) Control configurations and strategic initiatives. Sitkin SB, Cardinal LB, Bijlsma-Frankema KM, eds. Organizational Control (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 463–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreutzer M, Walter J, Cardinal LB (2015) Organizational control as an antidote to politics in the pursuit of strategic initiative performance? Strategic Management J. 36(9):1317–1337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazzarini SG, Miller GJ, Zenger TR (2004) Order with some law: Complementarity versus substitution of formal and informal arrangements. J. Law, Econom. Organ. 20(2):261–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LeBreton JM, Senter JL (2008) Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organ. Res. Methods 11(4):815–852.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lechner C, Floyd SW (2012) Group influence activities and the performance of strategic initiatives. Strategic Management J. 33(5):478–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lechner C, Kreutzer M (2011) Strategic initiatives: Past, present and future. Mazzola P, Kellermanns FW, eds. Handbook of Strategy Process Research (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 283–303.Google Scholar
• Lechner C, Frankenberger K, Floyd SW (2010) Task contingencies in the curvilinear relationships between intergroup networks and initiative performance. Acad. Management J. 53(4):865–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP (1990) A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP (2005) Goal setting theory. Theory building by induction. Smith KG, Hitt MA, eds. Great Minds in Management. The Process of Theory Development (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 128–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long CP, Bendersky C, Morrill C (2011) Fairness monitoring: Linking managerial controls and fairness judgements in organizations. Acad. Management J. 54(5):1045–1068.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long CP, Burton RM, Cardinal LB (2002) Three controls are better than one: A computational model of complex control systems. Computational Math. Organ. Theory 8(3):197–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loughry ML (2010) Peer control in organizations. Sitkin SB, Cardinal LB, Bijlsma-Frankema K, eds. Organizational Control (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 324–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loughry ML, Tosi HL (2008) Performance implications of peer monitoring. Organ. Sci. 19(6):876–890.Link, Google Scholar
• Lovas B, Ghoshal S (2000) Strategy as guided evolution. Strategic Management J. 21(9):875–896.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maydeu-Olivares A, Lado N (2003) Market orientation and business economic performance—A mediated model. Internat. J. Service Indust. Management 14(3–4):284–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath RG (2001) Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Acad. Management J. 44(1):118–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller CC, Cardinal LB, Glick WH (1997) Retrospective reports in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evidence. Acad. Management J. 40(1):189–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller CC, Washburn NT, Glick WH (2013) The myth of firm performance. Organ. Sci. 24(3):948–964.Link, Google Scholar
• Misangyi VF, Acharya AG (2014) Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1681–1705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mulaik SA, James LR, Alstine JV, Bennett N, Ling S, Stilwell CD (1989) Evaluation of goodness-of-fit for structural equation models. Psych. Bull. 105(3):430–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nag R, Hambrick DC, Chen MJ (2007) What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management J. 28(9):935–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Wohlgezogen F (2010) Attention and control. Sitkin SB, Cardinal L, Bijlsma-Frankema K, eds. Organizational Control (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 191–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Otley DT, Pierce BJ (1995) The control problem in public accounting firms—An empirical study of the impact of leadership style. Accounting Organ. Soc. 20(5):405–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG (1977) Relationship between organizational structure and organizational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(1):95–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG (1979) A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. 25(9):833–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG, Maguire MA (1975) Organizational control: Two functions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 20(4):559–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peterson KD (1984) Mechanisms of administrative control over managers in educational organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(4):573–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Rev. Psych. 63:539–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zenger T (2002) Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management J. 23(8):707–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poskela J, Martinsuo M (2009) Management control and strategic renewal in the front end of innovation. J. Product Innovation Management 26(6):671–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raisch S, Birkinshaw J (2008) Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J. Management 34(3):375–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramaswami SN (1996) Marketing controls and dysfunctional employee behaviors: A test of traditional and contingency theory postulates. J. Marketing 60(2):105–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sargan JD (1958) The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica 26(3):393–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saunders M, Mann R, Smith R (2008) Implementing strategic initiatives: A framework of leading practices. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management 28(11–12):1095–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (1998) Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Sci. 44(4):571–585.Link, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (2008) Organizational significance. Strategic Organ. 6(2):185–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegel J (2008) Lincoln Electric. Harvard Business School case study #9-707-445, Boston.Google Scholar
• Siemsen E, Roth A, Oliveira P (2010) Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organ. Res. Methods 13(3):456–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2002) Misperceiving interactions among complements and substitutes: Organizational consequences. Management Sci. 48(7):900–916.Link, Google Scholar
• Simons R (1991) Strategic orientation and top management attention to control systems. Strategic Management J. 12(1):49–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons R (1994) How new top managers use control systems as levers of strategic renewal. Strategic Management J. 15(3):169–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons T (2002) Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organ. Sci. 13(1):18–35.Link, Google Scholar
• Simsek Z (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. J. Management Stud. 46(4):597–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simsek Z, Heavey C, Veiga JF (2010) The impact of CEO core self-evaluation on the firm‘s entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management J. 31(1):110–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sitkin SB, Bies RJ, eds. (1994a) The Legalistic Organization (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Sitkin SB, Bies RJ (1994b) The legalization of organizations: A multi-theoretical perspective. Sitkin SB, Bies RJ, eds. The Legalistic Organization (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 19–49.Google Scholar
• Sitkin SB, Roth NL (1993) Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organ. Sci. 4(3):367–392.Link, Google Scholar
• Sitkin SB, Cardinal LB, Bijlsma-Frankema KM, eds. (2010) Organizational Control (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorensen JB (2002) The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):70–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart GL, Courtright SH, Barrick MR (2012) Peer-based control in self-managing teams: Linking rational and normative influence with individual and group performance. J. Appl. Psych. 97(2):435–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Yogo M (2004) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Working paper, Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe KM, Sitkin SB, Browning LD (2000) Tailoring process management to situational requirements. Cole RE, Scott WR, eds. The Quality Movement and Organization Theory (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 315–330.Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Actions (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Turner KL, Makhija MV (2006) The role of organizational controls in managing knowledge. Acad. Management Rev. 31(1):197–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J (2010) Identity work and control in occupational communities. Sitkin SB, Cardinal L, Bijlsma-Frankema K, eds. Organizational Control (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 111–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J, Barley SR (1984) Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 6:287–365.Google Scholar
• Walter J, Lechner C, Kellermanns FW (2016) Learning activities, exploration, and the performance of strategic initiatives. J. Management 42(3):769–802.Google Scholar
• Wang G, Oh I-S, Courtright SH, Colbert AE (2011) Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytical review of 25 years of research. Group Organ. Management 36(2):223–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams LJ, Cote JA, Buckley MR (1989) Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? J. Appl. Psych. 74(3):462–468.Crossref, Google Scholar