The Coevolution of Organizational Knowledge and Market Technology

References

• Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM (1978) Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Rev. 80(7):40–47.Google Scholar
• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert CM (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Gittleman M (2006) Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(4):774–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich HE, Ruef M (2006) Organizations Evolving, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Okhuysen GA, Perlow LA (2001) Taking time to integrate temporal research. Acad. Management Rev. 26(4):512–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman ML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Kluwer, Boston).Google Scholar
• Astley WG (1985) The two ecologies: Population and community perspectives on organizational evolution. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(2):224–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Lerner J (2013) Technological innovation and organization. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 575–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett WP (1990) The organizational ecology of a technological system. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):31–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett WP (2008) The Red Queen among Organizations (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett WP, Carroll GR (1987) Competition and mutualism among early telephone companies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 32(3):400–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett WP, Carroll GR (1995) Modeling internal organizational change. Annual Rev. Sociol. 21:217–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker MC (2004) Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Indust. Corporate Change 13(4):643–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks FP Jr (1975) The Mythical Man-Month (Addison Wesley, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brusoni S, Prencipe A, Pavitt K (2001) Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make?” Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):597–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA (2002) Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(2):325–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell DT (1965) Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. Barringer HR, Blanksten GI, Mack RW, eds. Social Change in Developing Areas: A Reinterpretation of Evolutionary Theory (Schenkman, Cambridge, MA), 19–49.Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Hannan MT (2000) The Demography of Corporations and Industries (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee RA, Eliashberg J (1990) The innovation diffusion process in a heterogeneous population: A micromodeling approach. Management Sci. 36(9):1057–1079.Link, Google Scholar
• Christensen C (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Cohen W, Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. 34(2):187–220.Google Scholar
• Dawkins R (1976) The Selfish Gene (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Dewar RD, Dutton JE (1986) The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 32(11):1422–1433.Link, Google Scholar
• Durham WH (1991) Coevolution: Genes, Culture, and Human Diversity (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP (2014) Competing technologies and industry evolution: The benefits of making mistakes in the flat panel display industry. Strategic Management J. 35(2):159–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Saloner G (1985) Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. Rand J. Econom. 16(1):70–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Galbraith JK (1967) The New Industrial State (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Gittleman M (2008) A note on the value of patents as indicators of innovation: Implications for management research. Acad. Management Perspect. 22(3):21–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights, and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper Series, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 49(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1989) Organizational Ecology (Harvard University Press, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE (1997) Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management J. 18(5):339–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland JH, Holyoak KJ, Nisbett RE, Thagard PR (1989) Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning and Discovery (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M (2000) How the incumbent can win: Managing technological transitions in the semiconductor industry. Management Sci. 46(2):169–185.Link, Google Scholar
• Ingram P, Roberts PW (1999) Suborganizational evolution in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Baum JAC, McKelvey B, eds. Variations in Organization Science (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 155–168.Google Scholar
• Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M, Fogarty M (2000) Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(2):215–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janzen DH (1980) When is it coevolution? Evolution 34(3):611–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(3):424–440.Google Scholar
• Khessina OM, Carroll GR (2008) Product demography of de novo and de alio firms in the optical disk drive industry, 1983–1999. Organ. Sci. 19(1):25–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA, Winter SG (2013) Hidden but in plain sight: The role of scale adjustment in industry dynamics. Strategic Management J. 35(11):1569–1584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B (2008) Knowledge, Options, and Institutions (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Lakatos I (1970) Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. Lakatos I, Musgrave A, eds. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiponen A, Helfat CE (2010) Innovation Objectives, Knowledge Sources, and the Benefits of Breadth. Strategic Management J. 31(2):224–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D, March J (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(Special Issue):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D, Myatt J (1994) Co-evolution of capabilities and industry: The evolution of mutual fund processing. Strategic Management J. 15(Suppl. S1):45–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D, Posen HE (2007) Myopia of selection: Does organizational adaptation limit the efficacy of population selection? Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):586–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin AY, Volberda HW (1999) Prolegomena on coevolution: A framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 10(5):519–534.Link, Google Scholar
• Lounamaa PH, March JG (1987) Adaptive coordination of a learning team. Management Sci. 33(1):107–123.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG (1994) A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1973) The Sociology of Science (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Oxley JE, Silverman BS (1996) Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):77–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murmann JP (2004) Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology and National Institutions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Padgett JF, Powell WW (2012) The problem of emergence. Padgett JF, Powell WW, eds. The Emergence of Organizations and Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavitt K (1998) Technologies, products and organisation in the innovating firm: What Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn’t. Indust. Corporate Change 7(3):433–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano GP (1990) The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):153–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J, Stuart T, Hannan MT (1996) Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984–1991. Amer. J. Sociol. 102(3):659–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG, Barnett WP (2017) The non-consensus entrepreneur: Organizational responses to vital events. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(1):140–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WJ, Koput K, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rafiquzzaman M (2005) Fundamentals of Digital Logic and Microcomputer Design, 5th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2005) Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2009) Hiding the evidence of valid theories: How coupled search processes obscure performance differences among organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):602–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB, Stuart TE (2000) Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):81–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (1990) Information and Organizations (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strang D, Soule S (1998) Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24:265–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T, Podolny J (1996) Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management J. 17(S1):21–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW, de Boer M (1999) Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organ. Sci. 10(5):551–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13(3):339–351.Link, Google Scholar