Market Entry by High Technology Startups: The Effect of Competition Level and Startup Innovativeness

References

• Agarwal S, Ramaswami SN (1992) Choice of foreign market entry mode: Impact of ownership, location and internalization factors. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 23(1):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal VA, Hsu DH (2014) Entrepreneurial exits and innovation. Management Sci. 60(4):867–887.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson E, Gatignon H (1986) Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 17(3): 1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond SR (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J. Econometrics 68(1): 29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Ceccagnoli M (2006) Patent protection, complementary assets, and firms’ incentives for technology licensing. Management Sci. 52(2):293–308.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Fosfuri A (2003) Licensing the market for technology. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 52(2):277–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Gambardella A (2010) Ideas for rent: An overview of markets for technology. Indust. Corporate Change 19(3):775–803.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Fosfuri A, Gambardella A (2001) Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bascle G (2008) Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 6(3): 285–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Calabrese T, Silverman BS (2000) Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management J. 21(3):267–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackwell M, Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2009) Cem: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. The Stata J. 9(4):524–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Bond SR (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics 87(1): 115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandenburger AM, Nalebuff BJ (1996) Co-opetition (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Brouthers KD (2002) Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 33(2):203–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buckley PJ, Casson MC (1998) Analyzing foreign market entry strategies: Extending the internalization approach. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 29(3):539–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campa JM, Kedia S (2002) Explaining the diversification discount. J. Finance 57(4):1731–1762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan CM, Makino S (2007) Legitimacy and multi-level institutional environments: Implications for foreign subsidiary ownership structure. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 38(4):621–638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang SJ, Chung J, Moon J (2013) When do foreign subsidiaries outperform local firms? J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 44(8):853–860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen MJ, Hambrick DC (1995) Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Acad. Management J. 38(2):453–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER working paper 7552, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colombo MG, Grilli L, Piva E (2006) In search of complementary assets: The determinants of alliance formation of high-tech start-ups. Res. Policy 35(8):1166–1199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Figueiredo R, Meyer-Doyle P, Rawley E (2013) Inherited agglomeration effects in hedge fund spawns. Strategic Management J. 34(7):843–862.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delios A, Beamish P (1999) Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: Transactional, institutional, and experience influences. Strategic Management J. 20(10):915–933.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dezső CL, Ross DG (2012) Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management J. 33(9):1072–1089.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan T, Phan PH (2007) International new ventures: Revisiting the influences behind the “born-global” firm. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 38(7):1113–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman ER, Amit R, Villalonga B (2016) Corporate divestitures and family control. Strategic Management J. 37(3):429–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fosfuri A (2006) The licensing dilemma: Understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing. Strategic Management J. 27(12):1141–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans J, Stern S (2003) The product market and the market for “Ideas”: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Res. Policy 32(2):333–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans J, Hsu DH, Stern S (2002) When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? Rand J. Econom. 33(4):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gedajlovic E, Shapiro DM (2002) Ownership structure and firm profitability in Japan. Acad. Management J. 45(2):565–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harhoff D, Scherer FM, Vopel K (2003) Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Res. Policy 32(8):1343–1363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hashai N (2011) Sequencing the expansion of geographic scope and foreign operations of “born global” firms. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 42(8):994–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hashai N (2015) Within-industry diversification and firm performance—An S-shaped hypothesis. Strategic Management J. 36(9): 1378–1400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennart J-F (1988) A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management J. 9(4):361–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill CWL, Hwang P, Kim WC (1990) An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic Management J. 11(2): 117–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu DH (2006) Venture capitalists and cooperative start-up commercialization strategy. Management Sci. 52(2):204–219.Link, Google Scholar
• Hymer S (1976) The International Operations of Nation Firms: A Study of Foreign Direct Investment (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens G (2004) Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. Rev. Econom. Stat. 86(1):4–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kale P, Singh H, Perlmutter H (2000) Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management J. 21(3):217–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Gulati R, Nohria N (1998) The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management J. 19(3):193–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King G, Nielsen R, Coberley C, Pope JE, Wells A (2011) Comparative effectiveness of matching methods for causal inference. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Lanjouw JO, Schankerman M (2004) Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Econom. J. 114(495):441–465.Google Scholar
• Leone MI, Reichstein T (2012) Licensing-in fosters rapid invention! The effect of the grant-back clause and technological unfamiliarity. Strategic Management J. 33(8):965–985.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (1994) The importance of patent scope: An empirical analysis. RAND J. Econom. 25(2):319–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madhok A (1997) Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: The transaction and the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(1):39–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nerkar A, Shane S (2003) When do start-ups that exploit patented academic knowledge survive? Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 21(9): 1391–1410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano GP (1990) The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):153–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1980) Competitive Advantage (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rawley E, Simcoe TS (2010) Diversification, diseconomies of scope, and vertical contracting: Evidence from the taxicab industry. Management Sci. 56(9):1534–1550.Link, Google Scholar
• Reitzig M, Puranam P (2009) Value appropriation as an organizational capability: The case of IP protection through patents. Strategic Management J. 30(7):765–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT (2001) Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):687–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Hill CW (2005) Technological discontinuities and complementary assets: A longitudinal study of industry and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 16(1):52–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Sargan J (1988) Testing for misspecification after estimation using instrumental variables. Sargan JD, Maasoumi E, eds. Contributions to Econometrics, Vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 213–235.Google Scholar
• Schmalensee R (1989) Intra-industry profitability differences in U.S. manufacturing 1953–1983. J. Indust. Econom. 37(4):337–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Senor D, Singer S (2009) Start-up Nation: The Story of Israel’s Economic Miracle (Twelve, Hachette Book Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Shaked A, Sutton J (1987) Product differentiation and industrial structure. J. Indust. Econom. 36(2):131–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (1998) Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Sci. 44(4):571–585.Link, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (2005) Testing for mediating variables in management research: Concerns, implications, and alternative strategies. J. Management 31(3):330–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simsek S, Veiga JF, Lubatkin MH (2007) The impact of managerialenvironmental perceptions on corporate entrepreneurship: Towards understanding discretionary slack’s pivotal role. J. Management 44(8):1398–1424.Google Scholar
• Singh K, Mitchell W (2005) Growth dynamics: The bidirectional relationship between interfirm collaboration and business sales in entrant and incumbent alliances. Strategic Management J. 28(6): 497–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suarez FF, Cusumano MA, Kahl SJ (2013) Services and the business models of product firms: An empirical analysis of the software industry. Management Sci. 59(2):420–435.Link, Google Scholar
• Sutton J (1991) Sunk Costs and Market Structure: Price Competition, Advertising, and the Evolution of Concentration (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sutton J (1998) Technology and Market Structure (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):785–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. The RAND J. Econom. 21(1):172–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uotila J, Maula M, Keil T, Zahra S (2009) Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management J. 30(2):221–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Zaheer S (1995) Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Acad. Management J. 38(2):341–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra S, Ireland R, Hitt M (2000) International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Acad. Management J. 43(5):925–950.Crossref, Google Scholar