What Makes a Decision Strategic? Strategic Representations

References

• Adner R, Levinthal DA (2008) Doing versus seeing: Acts of exploitation and perceptions of exploration. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 2(1):43–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashby WR (1956) Introduction to Cybernetics (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney JB (1986) Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Sci. 32(10):1230–1241.Link, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Beer RD (1995) A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction. Artificial Intelligence 72(1/2):173–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tripsas M (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management J. 33(3):277–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bingham CB, Eisenhardt KM (2011) Rational heuristics: The ‘simple rules’ that strategists learn from process experience. Strategic Management J. 32(13):1437–1464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandenburger AM, Stuart H (1996) Value-based business strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 5(1):5–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks RA (1991) Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence 47:139–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brunswik E (1952) The Conceptual Framework of Psychology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Burton RM, Obel B (2004) Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit, 3rd ed. (Kluwer, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A (2017) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision-making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. CEPR Discussion Paper no. DP12421, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3066033.Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Cattani G (2005) Preadaptation, firm heterogeneity, and technological performance: A study on the evolution of fiber optics, 1970–1995. Organ. Sci. 16(6):563–580.Link, Google Scholar
• Clark A (2008) Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark A, Toribio J (1994) Doing without representing? Synthese 101(3):401–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connelly BL, Tihanyi L, Ketchen DJ, Carnes CM, Ferrier WJ (2017) Competitive repertoire complexity: Governance antecedents and performance outcomes. Strategic Management J. 38(5):1151–1173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connor T (2002) The resource-based view of strategy and its value to practising managers. Strategic Change 11(6):307–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Craik KJW (1943) The Nature of Explanation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Crowther-Heyck H (2005) Herbert A. Simon: The Bounds of Reason in Modern America (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2012) Organizational structure as a determinant of performance: Evidence from mutual funds. Strategic Management J. 33(6):611–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2013) An efficient frontier in organization design: Organizational structure as a determinant of exploration and exploitation. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1083–1101.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Eggers JP (2013) Organizational decision making: An information aggregation view. Management Sci. 59(10):2257–2277.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Laureiro-Martinez D (2018) Individual and organizational antecedents of strategic foresight: A representational approach. Strategy Sci. 3(3):513–532.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Levinthal DA (2016) Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management J. 37(10):2031–2049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Ostler J (2018) A contingency theory of representational complexity in organizations. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Heshmati M, Rosenkranz N (2018) External representations in strategic decision making: Understanding strategy’s reliance on visuals. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• Dawes RM (1979) The robust beauty of improper linear-models in decision-making. Amer. Psych. 34(7):571–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J, Fang C, Winter SG (2003) The economics of strategic opportunity. Strategic Management J. 24(10):977–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobzhansky T (1973) Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Amer. Biol. Teacher 35(3):125–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Domingos P (1999) The role of Occam’s Razor in knowledge discovery. Data Mining Knowledge Discovery 3(4):409–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Kaplan S (2009) Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organ. Sci. 20(2):461–477.Link, Google Scholar
• Einhorn HJ, Hogarth RM (1975) Unit weighting schemes for decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 13(2):171–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Bourgeois LJ (1988) Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Acad. Management J. 31(4):737–770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang C, Lee J, Schilling MA (2010) Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 21(3):625–642.Link, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger TR (2016) Strategy, problems, and a theory for the firm. Organ. Sci. 27(1):222–231.Link, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger TR (2017) The theory-based view: Economic actors as theorists. Strategy Sci. 2(4):258–271.Link, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC, Cannella AA (2009) Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Klein PG, Kor YY, Mahoney JT (2008) Entrepreneurship, subjectivism, and the resource-based view: Toward a new synthesis. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 2(1):73–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank RH, Gilovich T, Regan DT (1993) Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? J. Econom. Perspect. 7(2):159–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fredrickson JW, Mitchell TR (1984) Strategic decision-processes: Comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment. Acad. Management J. 27(2):399–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardner H (1985) The Mind’s New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Gary MS, Wood RE (2011) Mental models, decision rules, and performance heterogeneity. Strategic Management J. 32(6):569–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2012) Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organ. Sci. 23(1):267–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Menon A (2016) Evolution cum agency: Toward a model of strategic foresight. Strategy Sci. 1(3):207–233.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2007) Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organ. Sci. 18(3):523–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P (1991) Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P (2002) Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Bus. Hist. Rev. 76(1):37–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S, Moran P (1996) Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. 21(1):13–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG (1996) Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psych. Rev. 103(4):650–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hastie R, Dawes RM (2010) Rational Choice in an Uncertain World: The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making (SAGE, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH (2009) The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2015) Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 36(6):831–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson GP, Sparrow P (2002) The Competent Organization: A Psychological Analysis of the Strategic Management Process (Open University Press, Buckingham, UK).Google Scholar
• Huff AS (1990) Mapping Strategic Thought (Wiley, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Hursch CJ, Hammond KR, Hursch JL (1964) Some methodological considerations in multiple-cue probability studies. Psych. Rev. 71(1):42–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutchins E (1995a) Cognition in the Wild (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutchins E (1995b) How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Sci. 19(3):265–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P, Kaplan S (2015) Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice. Strategic Management J. 36(4):537–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2011) Strategy and PowerPoint: An inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making. Organ. Sci. 22(2):320–346.Link, Google Scholar
• Karelaia N, Hogarth RM (2008) Determinants of linear judgment: A meta-analysis of lens model studies. Psych. Bull. 134(3):404–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirsh D (2010) Thinking with external representations. AI Soc. 25(4):441–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraaijenbrink J, Spender JC, Groen AJ (2010) The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques. J. Management 36(1):349–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiblein MJ (2011) What do resource- and capability-based theories propose? J. Management 37(4):909–932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (2011) A behavioral approach to strategy: What’s the alternative? Strategic Management J. 32(13):1517–1523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindsay PH, Norman DA (1977) Human Information Processing: An Introduction to Psychology (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Lockett A, Thompson S, Morgenstern U (2009) The development of the resource-based view of the firm: A critical appraisal. Internat. J. Management Rev. 11(Special Issue):9–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKay DJC (2003) Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• MacKenzie D, Millo Y (2003) Constructing a market, performing theory: The historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. 109(1):107–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney JT (1995) The management of resources and the resource of management. J. Bus. Res. 33(2):91–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makadok R (2001a) A pointed commentary on Priem and Butler. Acad. Management Rev. 26(4):498–499.Google Scholar
• Makadok R (2001b) Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management J. 22(5):387–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mark JT, Marion BB, Hoffman DD (2010) Natural selection and veridical perceptions. J. Theoret. Biol. 266(4):504–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martignoni D, Menon A, Siggelkow N (2016) Consequences of misspecified mental models: Contrasting effects and the role of cognitive fit. Strategic Management J. 37(13):2545–2568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McNamara GM, Luce RA, Tompson GH (2002) Examining the effect of complexity in strategic group knowledge structures on firm performance. Strategic Management J. 23(2):153–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menon A (2018) Bringing cognition into strategic interactions: Strategic mental models and open questions. Strategic Management J. 39(1):168–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milliken FJ (1990) Perceiving and interpreting environmental change: An examination of college administrators’ interpretation of changing demographics. Acad. Management J. 33(1):42–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H, Raisinghani D, Théorêt A (1976) The structure of ‘unstructured’ decision processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 21(2):246–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Munger CT, Kaufman PD (2005) Poor Charlie’s Almanack: The Wit and Wisdom of Charles T. Munger (Donning Co., Virginia Beach, VA).Google Scholar
• Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human Problem Solving (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Newell A, Simon HA (1976) Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search. Comm. ACM 19(3):113–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2004) A knowledge-based theory of the firm: The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Clark T (2010) Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Baden-Fuller C (1989) Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. J. Management Stud. 26(4):397–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1980) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Leiblein MJ, Chen JS (2018a) Toward a behavioral theory of real options: Noisy signals, bias, and learning. Strategic Management J. 39(4):1112–1138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Keil T, Kim S, Meissner FD (2018b) Renewing research on problemistic search: A review and research agenda. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):208–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Priem RL, Butler JE (2001) Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Acad. Management Rev. 26(1):22–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Swamy M (2016) How initial representations shape coupled learning processes. Organ. Sci. 27(2):323–335.Link, Google Scholar
• Pylyshyn ZW (1984) Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Pylyshyn ZW (1992) Cognitive science. Shapiro SC, ed. Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 188–192.Google Scholar
• Ries E (2011) The Lean Startup (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Robbins P, Aydede M (2009) A short primer on situated cognition. Robbins P, Aydede M, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 3–10.Google Scholar
• Rumelt RP (2011) Good Strategy, Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Russell SJ, Norvig P (2010) Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 3rd ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Savage LJ (1954) The Foundations of Statistics (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1996a) The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1996b) Models of My Life (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1997) Administrative Behavior, 4th ed. (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Spender JC (1989) Industry Recipes: An Enquiry into the Nature and Sources of Managerial Judgement (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Thagard P (2005) Mind: Introduction to Cognitive Science, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Walsh JP (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ. Sci. 6(3):280–321.Link, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 5(2):171–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger TR (2013) What is the theory of your firm? Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(6):72–78.Google Scholar