Category Strategy for Firm Advantage

References

• Apple Inc. (2010) Apple launches iPad. Accessed April 26, 2018, https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2010/01/27Apple-Launches-iPad/.Google Scholar
• Barnett WP, Hansen MT (1996) The red queen in organizational evolution. Strategic Management J. 17(S1):139–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett WP, Pontikes EG (2008) The Red Queen, success bias, and organizational inertia. Management Sci. 54(7):1237–1251.Link, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger P, Luckmann T (1967) The Social Construction of Reality (Anchor Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Carpenter GS, Nakamoto K (1989) Consumer preference formation and pioneering advantage. J. Marketing Res. 26(3):285–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Hannan MT (2000) The Demography of Corporations and Industries (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Swaminathan A (2000) Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the U.S. brewing industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):715–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Porac JF, Thomas H (2017) Categories and competition. Strategic Management J. 38(1):64–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Sands D, Porac JF, Greenberg J (2018) Competitive sensemaking in value creation and capture. Strategy Sci. 3(4):632–657.Link, Google Scholar
• Caves RE, Porter ME (1977) From entry barriers to mobility barriers: Conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competition. Quart. J. Econom. 91(2):241–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Durand R, Levine DI, Touboul S (2016) Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management J. 37(8):1597–1614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark KB (1985) The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Res. Policy 14(5):235–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cool K, Schendel D (1987) Strategic group formation and performance: The case of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry, 1963–1982. Management Sci. 33:1102–1124.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2018) What makes a decision strategic? Strategic representations. Strategy Sci. 3(4):606–619.Link, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL (1999) To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management J. 20(2):147–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ (1987) Classification in art. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 52(2):440–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ (1997) Culture and cognition. Annual Rev. Sociol. 23:263–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Khaire M (2017) Where do market categories come from and how? Distinguishing category creation from category emergence. J. Management 43(1):87–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Paolella L (2013) Category stretching: Reorienting research on categories in strategy, entrepreneurship, and organization theory. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1100–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durkheim É (2001) The Elementary Forms of Religious Life (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Edmiston P, Lupyan G (2013) Verbal and nonverbal cues activate concepts differently, at different times. Knauff M, Pauen M, Sebanz N, Wachsmuth I, eds. Proc. 35th Annual Conf. Cognitive Sci. Soc. (Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX), 2243–2248.Google Scholar
• Gelman SA, Heyman GD (1999) Carrot-eaters and creature-believers: The effects of lexicalization on children’s inferences about social categories. Psych. Sci. 10(6):489–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg A, Hannan M, Kovács B (2016) What does it mean to span cultural boundaries? Variety and atypicality in cultural consumption. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(2):215–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstone RL (1994) Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 123(2):178–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstone RL, Lippa Y, Shiffrin RM (2001) Altering object representations through category learning. Cognition 78(1):27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman N (1970) Seven strictures on similarity. Foster L, Swanson JW, eds. Experience & Theory (The University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst), 19–30.Google Scholar
• Granqvist N, Grodal S, Woolley JL (2013) Hedging your bets: Explaining executives’ market labeling strategies in nanotechnology. Organ. Sci. 24(2):395–413.Link, Google Scholar
• Grodal S (2017) Field expansion and contraction: How communities shape social and symbolic boundaries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):783–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Fredrickson J (2001) Are you sure you have a strategy. Acad. Management Executive 15(4):48–59.Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Freeman J (1977) The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 82:929–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Le Mens G, Hsu G, Kovács B, Negro G, Polos L, Pontikes E, Sharkey A (2018) Concepts and Categories: Foundations for Sociological Analysis. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Helfat CE (1997) Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management J. 18(5):339–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoberg G, Phillips G (2010) Product market synergies and competition in mergers and acquisitions: A text-based analysis. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(10):3773–3811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G (2006a) Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):420–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G (2006b) Evaluative schemas and the attention of critics in the US film industry. Indust. Corporate Change 15(3):467–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Grodal S (2015) Category taken-for-grantedness as a strategic opportunity: The case of light cigarettes, 1964 to 1993. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(1):28–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Hannan MT (2005) Identities, genres, and organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 16(5):474–490.Link, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Podolny JM (2005) Critiquing the critics: an approach for the comparative evaluation of critical schemas. Soc. Sci. Res. 34(1):189–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Hannan MT, Koçak O (2009) Multiple category memberships in markets: An integrative theory and two empirical tests. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahl SJ, Grodal S (2016) Discursive strategies and radical technological change: Multi-level discourse analysis of the early computer (1947–1958). Strategic Management J. 37(1):149–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Tripsas M (2008) Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Res. Policy 37(5):790–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Vakili K (2015) The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1435–1457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kay P, Kempton W (1984) What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis? Amer. Anthropologist 86(1):65–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khaire M (2014) Fashioning an industry: Socio-cognitive processes in the construction of worth of a new industry. Organ. Stud. 35(1):41–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG, Pearce NA (2010) The contentiousness of markets: Politics, social movements, and institutional change in markets. Annual Rev. Sociol. 36(1):249–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Hannan MT (2010) The consequences of category spanning depend on contrast. Hsu G, Negro G, Kocak O, eds. Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 175–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Hannan MT (2015) Conceptual spaces and the consequences of category spanning. Sociol. Sci. 2:252–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Sharkey AJ (2014) The paradox of publicity: How awards can negatively affect the evaluation of quality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamont M, Molnar V (2002) The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Rev. Sociol. 28:167–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landau B, Shipley E (2001) Labeling patterns and object naming. Developmental Sci. 4(1):109–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leung M, Sharkey A (2013) Out of sight, out of mind? Evidence of perceptual factors in the multiple-category discount. Organ. Sci. 25:171–184.Link, Google Scholar
• Liberman AM, Harris KS, Hoffman HS, Griffith BC (1957) The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. J. Experiment. Psych. 54(5):358–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lupyan G, Rakison DH, McClelland JL (2007) Language is not just for talking: Redundant labels facilitate learning of novel categories. Psych. Sci. 18(12):1077–1083.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCarthy JD, Zald MN (1977) Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(6):1212–1241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGee J, Thomas H (1986) Strategic groups: theory, research and taxonomy. Strategic Management J. 7(2):141–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Medin DL, Goldstone RL, Gentner D (1993) Respects for similarity. Psych. Rev. 100(2):254–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mervis CB, Rosch E (1981) Categorization of natural objects. Annual Rev. Psych. 32(1):89–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer J, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishra P, Pontikes E (2015) Dandelion Chocolate. Unpublished case study, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Mitchell W (1989) Whether and when? Probability and timing of incumbents’ entry into emerging industrial subfields. Admin. Sci. Quart. 34(2):208–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy G (2004) The Big Book of Concepts (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Murphy GL, Medin DL (1985) The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psych. Rev. 92(3):289–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2010) How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):439–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• NBC News (2015) Ford CEO: We're a 'mobility company' that does more than make cars. NBC News (January 7), https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/ces-2015/ford-ceo-were-mobility-company-does-more-make-cars-n281191.Google Scholar
• Negro G, Hannan MT, Rao H (2010) Categorical contrast and audience appeal: Niche width and critical success in winemaking. Indust. Corporate Change 19(5):1397–1425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Loewenstein J, Nigam A (2015) How streams of communication reproduce and change institutional logics: The role of categories. Acad. Management Rev. 40(1):28–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paolella L, Durand R (2016) Category spanning, evaluation, and performance: Revised theory and test on the corporate law market. Acad. Management J. 59(1):330–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penrose E (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. 14(3):179–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peteraf MA, Shanley M (1997) Getting to know you: A theory of strategic group identity. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):165–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock N, Williams R (2009) The sociology of a market analysis tool: How industry analysts sort vendors and organize markets. Inform. Organ. 19(2):129–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock N, Williams R (2011) Who decides the shape of product markets? The knowledge institutions that name and categorise new technologies. Inform. Organ. 21(4):194–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes E (2018) Category innovation in the software industry, 1990–2002. Working paper, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG, Barnett WP (2015) The persistence of lenient market categories. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1415–1431.Link, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG, Barnett WP (2017a) The non-consensus entrepreneur: Organizational responses to vital events. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(1):140–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG, Barnett WP (2017b) The coevolution of organizational knowledge and market technology. Strategy Sci. 2(1):64–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG, Hannan MT (2014) An ecology of social categories. Sociol. Sci. 1:311–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG, Kim R (2017) Strategic categorization. Durand R, Granqvist N, Tyllstrom A, eds. From Categories to Categorization: Studies in Sociology, Organizations and Strategy at the Crossroads, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 51 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 71–111. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H (1990) Taxonomic mental models in competitor definition. Acad. Management Rev. 15(2):224–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Baden-Fuller C (1989) Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. J. Management Stud. 26(4):397–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Wilson F, Paton D, Kanfer A (1995) Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 20(2):203–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M (1996) What is strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(6):61–78.Google Scholar
• Porter M, Siggelkow N (2008) Contextuality within activity systems and sustainability of competitive advantage. Acad. Management Perspect. 22(2):34–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1980) Competitive Strategy (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Porter ME (2008) The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(1):1–18.Google Scholar
• Ramadan A, Peterson D, Lochhead C, Maney K (2016) Play Bigger: How Pirates, Dreamers, and Innovators Create and Dominate Markets (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
• Rao H (2008) Market Rebels: How Activists Make or Break Radical Innovations (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2005) Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(6):968–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Petkova AP (2007) When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organ. Sci. 18(2):217–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Rindova V, Ferrier WJ, Wiltbank R (2010) Value from gestalt: how sequences of competitive actions create advantage for firms in nascent markets. Strategic Management J. 31(13):1474–1497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson J (1933) The Economics of Imperfect Competition (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Rosa JA, Porac JF, Runser-Spanjol J, Saxon MS (1999) Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market. J. Marketing 63(4):64–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M (1999) Social ontology and the dynamics of organizational forms: Creating market actors in the healthcare field, 1966–1994. Soc. Forces 77(4):1403–1432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M, Patterson K (2009) Credit and classification: Defining industry boundaries in nineteenth century America. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(3):486–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rumelt RP, Schendel DE, Teece DJ (1994) Fundamental Issues in Strategy: A Research Agenda (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Santos F, Eisenhardt K (2009) Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Acad. Management J. 52(4):643–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith EB (2011) Identities as lenses: How organizational identity affects audiences’ evaluation of organizational performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(1):61–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Page R, Ryder T (2010) Leadership, culture, and transition at lululemon. Case 410–705, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Tversky A (1977) Features of similarity. Psych. Rev. 84(4):327–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vergne JP, Wry T (2013) Categorizing categorization research: Review, integration, and future directions. J. Management Stud. 51(1):56–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber K, Heinze KL, DeSoucey M (2008) Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):529–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weigelt K, MacMillan I (1988) An interactive strategic analysis framework. Strategic Management J. 9(S1):27–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White H (1981) Where do markets come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 87(3):517–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winawer J, Witthoft N, Frank MC, Wu L, Wade AR, Boroditsky L (2007) Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104(19):7780–7785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2011) Legitimating nascent collective identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 22(2):449–463.Link, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M, Jennings PD (2013) Hybrid vigor: Securing venture capital by spanning categories in nanotechnology. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1309–1333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoffie D, Baldwin E (2015) Apple, Inc. in 2015. Case 715–456, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar