What Makes a Decision Strategic?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2018.0074

References

  • Andrews KR (1971) The Concept of Corporate Strategy (Irwin, Homewood, IL).Google Scholar
  • Argyres NS, Bigelow L, Nickerson JA (2015) Dominant designs, innovation shocks, and the follower’s dilemma. Strategic Management J. 36(2):216–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow KJ (1966) Optimal capital policy with irreversible investment. Technical Report No. 146, Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • Arrow KJ (1973) Information and economic behavior. Report No. AD 768-446, Prepared for Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Athey S, Stern S (1998) An empirical framework for testing theories about complementarity in organizational design. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 6600, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berg NA, Fast ND (1975) Lincoln Electric Co. HBS Case 376-028, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Berger PL, Luckmann T (1967) The Social Construction of Reality (Penguin Books).Google Scholar
  • Bettis R, Blettner D (2018) Strategic reality. Strategic Management Rev. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Boone AL, Field LC, Karpoff JM, Raheja CG (2007) The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical analysis. J. Financial Econom. 85(1):66–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowman EH and Hurry D (1993) Strategy through the option lens: An integrated view of resource investments and incremental-choice process. Acad. Management Rev. 18(4):760–782.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bower J (1970) Managing the Resource Allocation Process (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Brandenburger AM, Stuart HW Jr (1996) Value‐based business strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 5(1):5–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandenburger AM, Stuart HW (2007) Biform games. Management Sci. 53(4):537–549.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brealey R, Myers S, Allen F (2010) Corporate Finance, 10th ed. (McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York).Google Scholar
  • Burgelman RA (1983) A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28(2):223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cattani G, Porac J, Thomas H (2017) Categories and competition. Strategic Management J. 38(1):64–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cattani G, Sands D, Porac J, Greenberg J (2018) Competitive sensemaking in value creation and capture. Strategy Sci. 3(4):632–657.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Caves RE (1996) Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Chandler A (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Chatain O, Zemsky P (2011) Value creation and value capture with frictions. Strategic Management J. 32(11):1206–1231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen R, Andrews K, Bower J, Hamermesh R, Porter ME (1987) Business Policy: Text and Cases (Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL).Google Scholar
  • Courtney H, Kirkland J, Viguerie P (1997) Strategy under uncertainty. Harvard Bus. Rev. 75(6):67–79.Google Scholar
  • Csaszar FA (2018) What makes a decision strategic? Strategic representations. Strategy Sci. 3(4):606–619.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Csaszar FA, Levinthal DA (2016) Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management J. 37(10):2031–2049.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demsetz H, Lehn K (1985) The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. J. Political Econom. 93(6):1155–1177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dixit AK, Nalebuff BJ (1991) Thinking Strategically: The Competitive Edge in Business, Politics, and Everyday Life (WW Norton & Co., New York).Google Scholar
  • Dixit AK, Pindyck RS (1994) Investment Under Uncertainty (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dixit A, Nalebuff B (2008) The Art of Strategy: A Game Theorist's Guide to Success in Business and Life (WW Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Durand R, Grant RM, Madsen TL (2017) The expanding domain of strategic management research and the quest for integration. Strategic Management J. 38:4–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elfenbein DW, Zenger T (2017) Creating and capturing value in repeated exchange relationships: The second paradox of embeddedness. Organ. Sci. 28(5):894–914.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Elfenbein D, Sterling A (2018) (When) is hiring strategic? Human capital acquisition in the age of the algorithm. Strategy Sci. 3(4):668–682.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T, Zenger TR (2014) Open or closed innovation? Problem solving and governance choice. Res. Policy 43(5):914–925.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T, Zenger TR (2017) The theory-based view: Economic actors as theorists. Strategy Sci. 2(4):258–271.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Folta TB (1998) Governance and uncertainty: The tradeoff between administrative control and commitment, Strategic Management J. 19:1007–1028.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foss N, Klein PG. (2012) Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gans J, Ryall MD (2017) Value capture theory: A strategic management review. Strategic Management J. 38(1):17–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G (2012) Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organ. Sci. 23(1):267–285.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Levinthal DA (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Porac J (2018) On the origin of great strategies. Strategy Sci. 3(1):352–365.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ghemawat P (1997) Games Businesses Play: Cases and Models (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Ghemawat P (2016) Evolving ideas about business strategy. Bus. Hist. Rev. 90(Autumn):1–23.Google Scholar
  • Ghemawat P (1991) Commitment (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(Winter):109–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart O, Moore J (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1119–1158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35:9–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman W, Lavie D, Reuer J, Shipilov A (2018) The interplay of competition and cooperation. Strategic Management J. 39(12):3033–3052.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ichniowski C, Shaw K, Prennushi G (1997) The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(3):291–313.Google Scholar
  • Kaplan S (2011) Research in cognition and strategy: Reflections on two decades of progress and a look to the future. J. Management Stud. 48(3):665–695.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B (1991) Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Sci. 37(1):19–33.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B, Kulatilaka N (1994) Operating flexibility, global manufacturing, and the option value of a multinational network. Management Sci. 40(1):123–139.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):7383–7397.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leiblein MJ, Chen JS, Posen HE (2017) Resource allocation in strategic factor markets: A realistic real options approach to generating competitive advantage. J. Management 43(8):2588–2608.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard‐Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in management product development. Strategic Management J. 13(Special Issue):111–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • MacDonald G, Ryall MD (2004) How do value creation and competition determine whether a firm appropriates value? Management Sci. 50(10):1319–1333.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Makadok R (2011) Invited editorial: The four theories of profit and their joint effects. J. Management 37(5):1316–1334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McDonald R, Siegel D (1986) The value of waiting to invest. Quart. J. Econom. 101(4):707–727.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Menon AR, Yao DA (2017) Elevating repositioning costs: Strategy dynamics and competitive interactions. Strategic Management J. 38(10):1953–1963.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P, Roberts J (1990) The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(3):511–528.Google Scholar
  • Mintzberg HD (1978) Patterns in strategy formation. Management Sci. 24(9):934–948.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H, Raisinghani D, Theoret A (1976) The structure of “unstructured” decision processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 21(2):246–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson J, Argyres N (2018) Strategizing before strategic decision making. Strategy Sci. 3(4):592–605.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W (1997) Toward an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W, Loewenstein J, Nigam A (2015) How streams of communication reproduce and change institutional logics: The role of categories. Acad. Management Rev. 40(1):28–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oxley J, Rivkin JW, Ryall MD, Strategy Research Initiative (2010) The Strategy Research Initiative: Recognizing and encouraging high-quality research in strategy. Strategic Organ. 8(4):377–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ozmel U, Yavuz D, Reuer J, Zenger T (2017) Network prominence, bargaining power, and the allocation of value capturing rights in high-tech alliance contracts. Organ. Sci. 28(5):947–964.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Penrose E (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage. A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. 14(3):179–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano GP (2015) A normative theory of dynamic capabilities: Connecting strategy, know-how, and competition. Working Paper 16-036, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Pontikes E (2018) Competitive strategy for firm advantage. Strategy Sci. 3(4):620–631.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Porter ME (1980) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Porter ME (1985) Competitive Advantage. Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Porter ME (1996) What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. 74:61–78.Google Scholar
  • Posen HE, Leiblein MJ, Chen JS (2018) Toward a behavioral theory of real options: Noisy signals, bias, and learning. Strategic Management J. 39(4):1112–1138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Postrel S (2012) Organizational substitutes and complements. Presentation, December 7, The Ohio State University, Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  • Prahalad CK, Hamel G (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 68(3):79–91.Google Scholar
  • Quinn JB (1980) Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism (Irwin, Homewood, IL).Google Scholar
  • Rivkin JW (1999) Husky injection molding systems. HBS Case 799-157, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Rivkin JW (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6):824–844.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. 49(3):290–311.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rotemberg J, Saloner G (1994) Benefits of narrow business strategies. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(5):1330–1349.Google Scholar
  • Rumelt RP (1984) Toward a strategic theory of the firm. R. B. Lamb, ed. Competitive Strategic Management (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 556–570.Google Scholar
  • Rumelt RP (2011) Good Strategy, Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
  • Rumelt R, Schendel D, Teece D (1994) Fundamental Issues in Strategy: A Research Agenda (Harvard College, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Schelling TC (1960) Strategy of Conflict (Harvard College, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Senge PM (1990) The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (Doubleday, Currency, New York).Google Scholar
  • Siggelkow N (2001) Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Acad. Management J. 44(4):838–857.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N (2002) Evolution toward fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):125–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N (2011) Firms as systems of interdependent choices. J. Management Stud. 48(5):1126–1140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philosoph. Soc. 106:467–482.Google Scholar
  • Smith C, Watts R (1992) The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend and compensation policies. J. Financial Econom. 32(3):263–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trigeorgis L (1996) Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Trigeorgis L, Reuer J (2017) Real options theory in strategic management. Strategic Management J. 38(1):42–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Steen E (2017) A formal theory of strategy. Management Sci. 63(8):2616–2636.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Steen E (2018) The strategy in competitive interactions. Strategy Sci. 3(4):574–591.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Williamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):269–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zingales L (2000) In search of new foundations. J. Finance 55(4):1623–1653.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.