Rationalizing Outcomes: Interdependent Learning in Competitive Markets

References

• Aghion P, Espinosa MP, Jullien B (1993) Dynamic duopoly with learning through market experimentation. Econom. Theory 3(3):517–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Aumann R, Brandenburger A (1995) Epistemic conditions for Nash equilibrium. Econometrica 63(5):1161–1180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barr P, Stimpert J, Huff A (1992) Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):15–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J, Lant T (2003) Hits and misses: Managers’ (mis) categorization of competitors in the Manhattan hotel industry. Adv. Strategic Management 20:119–156.Google Scholar
• Bowman E (1978) Strategy, annual reports, and alchemy. California Management Rev. 20(3):64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bremmer RP, Eisenhardt KM (2022) Organizing form, experimentation, and performance: Innovation in the nascent civilian drone industry. Organ. Sci. 33(4):1645–1674.Link, Google Scholar
• Brunswik E (1952) The Conceptual Framework of Psychology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Butler C, Ghoshal S (2002) Hindustan Lever Limited: Levers for Change (INSEAD Publishing, Fontainebleau, France).Google Scholar
• Camerer CF (2003) Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Ho T-H, Chong J-K (2004) A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quart. J. Econom. 119(3):861–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Ho T-H, Chong JK (2015) A psychological approach to strategic thinking in games. Current Opinion Behav. Sci. 3:157–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi T-M, Hui C-L, Yu Y (2014) Intelligent Fashion Forecasting Systems: Models and Applications (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Bower JL (1996) Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. 17(3):197–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coyne KP, Horn J (2009) Predicting your competitor’s reaction. Harvard Bus. Rev. 87(4):90–97.Google Scholar
• Craik K (1943) The Nature of Explanation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Crain Communications (1996) The 100-Year Almanac and 1996 Market Data Book Issue (Crain Communications, Detroit).Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2014) Bridging the gulf between executive characteristics and organizational outcomes: The intertwined roles of cognition, aggregation structure, and the environment. Preprint, submitted May 2, 2013, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2259253.Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2018) What makes a decision strategic? Strategic representations. Strategy Sci. 3(4):606–619.Link, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Levinthal DA (2016) Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management J. 37(10):2021–2049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA, Ostler J (2020) A contingency theory of representational complexity in organizations. Organ. Sci. 31(5):1198–1219.Link, Google Scholar
• Cyert R, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Daft RL, Weick KE (1984) Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):284–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Figueiredo RJ Jr, Rakove J, Weingast BR (2006) Rationality, inaccurate mental representations, and self-confirming equilibrium: A new understanding of the American Revolution. J. Theoretical Politics 18(4):384–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denoual DG (1980) The diffusion of innovations, an institutional approach: A thesis Unpublished doctoral thesis, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Denrell J, March JG (2001) Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organ. Sci. 12(5):523–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Epley N, Keysar B, Van Boven L, Gilovich T (2004) Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 87(3):327–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Estes D, Wellman HM, Woolley JD (1989) Children’s understanding of mental phenomena. Adv. Child Development Behav. 22:41–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fahey L, Narayanan V (1989) Linking changes in revealed causal maps and environmental change: An empirical study. J. Management Stud. 26(4):361–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford H, Crowther S (1922) My Life and Work (Doubleday, Page & Company, Garden City, NY).Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Levine D (1993) Self-confirming equilibrium. Econometrica 61(3):523–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2012) Perspective—Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organ. Sci. 23(1):267–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Menon A (2016) Evolution cum agency: Toward a model of strategic foresight. Strategy Sci. 1(3):207–233.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA, Rivkin JW (2005) Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management J. 26(8):691–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentner D (1983) Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Sci. 7(2):155–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P (1991) Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, LiCalzi M, Warglien M (2021) What situation is this? Shared frames and collective performance. Strategy Sci. 6(2):124–140.Link, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Poole PP (1984) Scripts in organizational behavior. Acad. Management Rev. 9(3):449–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1974) Frame Analysis (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Gordon RM (1986) Folk psychology as simulation. Mind Language 1(2):158–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grösnhaug K, Falkenberg JS (1989) Exploring strategy perceptions in changing environments. J. Management Stud. 26(4):349–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartman LP, Werhane PH (2013) The Global Corporation: Sustainable, Effective and Ethical Practices, a Case Book (Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Healy PJ (2017) Epistemic experiments: Utilities, beliefs, and irrational play. Unpublished manuscript, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2015) Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 36(6):831–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer J, Riley JG (1992) The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland J, Holyoak K, Nisbett R, Thagard P (1986) Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning and Discovery (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Holyoak K (2012) Analogy and relational reasoning. Holyoak K, Morrison R, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 234–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird PN (2010) Mental representations and human reasoning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107(43):18243–18250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird PN (2013) Inference with mental representations. Holyoak K, Morrison R, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (National Academy of Science, Washington, DC), 134–154.Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2011) Research in cognition and strategy: Reflections on two decades of progress and a look to the future. J. Management Stud. 48(3):665–695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karelaia N, Hogarth RM (2008) Determinants of Linear Judgment: A Meta-Analysis of Lens Model Studies (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Keysers C, Gazzola V (2014) Hebbian learning and predictive mirror neurons for actions, sensations and emotions. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 369(1644):20130175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kneeland T (2013) Testing Behavioral Game Theory: Higher-Order Rationality and Consistent Beliefs (University College London, London).Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Srikanth K (2014) Coordinated exploration organizing joint search by multiple specialists to overcome mutual confusion and joint myopia. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(3):409–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreps DM, Scheinkman JA (1983) Quantity precommitment and Bertrand competition yield Cournot outcomes. Bell J. Econom. 14(2):326–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Lant TK, Baum JA (1995) Cognitive sources of socially constructed competitive groups: Examples from the Manhattan hotel industry. Inst. Construction Organ. 15:38.Google Scholar
• Lave CA, March JG (1993) An Introduction to Models in the Social Sciences (University Press of America, Lanham, MD).Google Scholar
• Leifer EM, White HC (2004) A structural approach to markets. Dobbin F, ed. The New Economic Sociology: A Reader (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 302–324.Google Scholar
• Lenox MJ, Rockart SF, Lewin AY (2007) Interdependency, competition, and industry dynamics. Management Sci. 53(4):599–615.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (2011) A behavioral approach to strategy—What’s the alternative? Strategic Management J. 32(13):1517–1523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Libert B, Bonchek M (2017) To change your strategy, first change how you think. Preprint, submitted May 17, https://hbr.org/2017/05/to-change-your-strategy-first-change-how-you-think.Google Scholar
• Lounamaa PH, March JG (1987) Adaptive coordination of a learning team. Management Sci. 33(1):107–123.Link, Google Scholar
• Maignan I, Lukas BA (1997) Entry mode decisions: The role of managers’ mental representations. J. Global Marketing 10(4):7–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Shapira Z (1987) Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Sci. 33(11):1404–1418.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon H (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Martignoni D, Menon A, Siggelkow N (2016) Consequences of misspecified mental representations: Contrasting effects and the role of cognitive fit. Strategic Management J. 37(13):2545–2568.Google Scholar
• Menon A (2018) Bringing cognition into strategic interactions: Strategic mental representations and open questions. Strategic Management J. 39(1):168–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mezias J, Grinyer P, Guth WD (2001) Changing collective cognition: A process model for strategic change. Long Range Planning 34(1):71–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milliken F (1990) Perceiving and interpreting environmental change: An examination of college administrators’ interpretation of changing demographics. Acad. Management J. 33(1):42–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perea A (2012) Epistemic Game Theory: Reasoning and Choice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H (1990) Taxonomic mental representations in competitor definition. Acad. Management Rev. 15(2):224–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Baden-Fuller C (1989) Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. J. Management Stud. 26(4):397–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Wilson F, Paton D, Kanfer A (1995) Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):203–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Spence AM (1982) The capacity expansion process in a growing oligopoly: The case of corn wet milling. The Economics of Information and Uncertainty (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 259–316.Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Swamy M (2016) How initial representations shape coupled learning processes. Organ. Sci. 27(2):323–335.Link, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Stieglitz N, Osman M, Pillutla MM (2015) Modelling bounded rationality in organizations: Progress and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):337–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajan R, Volpin P, Zingales L (2000) The eclipse of the US tire industry. Mergers and Productivity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 51–92.Google Scholar
• Reger RK, Palmer TB (1996) Managerial categorization of competitors: Using old maps to navigate new environments. Organ. Sci. 7(1):22–39.Link, Google Scholar
• Ryall M (2003) Subjective rationality, self–confirming equilibrium, and corporate strategy. Management Sci. 49(7):936–949.Link, Google Scholar
• Schwartzstein J, Sunderam A (2021) Using models to persuade. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(1):276–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegal M, Varley R (2002) Neural systems involved in “theory of mind.” Nature Rev. Neuroscience 3(6):463–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2009) Hiding the evidence of valid theories: How coupled search processes obscure performance differences among organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):602–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H (1947) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision Making Processes in Administrative Organization (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Sloan AP Jr (1964) My Years at General Motors (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Stahl DO, Wilson P (1995) On players’ models of other players: Theory and experimental evidence. Games Econom. Behav. 10:218–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sull DN (1999) The dynamics of standing still: Firestone Tire & Rubber and the radial revolution. Bus. Hist. Rev. 73(3):430–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe K (1994) What executives notice: Accurate perceptions in top management teams. Acad. Management J. 37(5):1360–1378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tedlow RS (2010) Denial: Why Business Leaders Fail to Look Facts in the Face—And What to Do About It (Penguin, New York).Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vachani S (1991) Multinationals in India: Strategic Product Choices (Oxford & IBH Publishing, New Delhi, India).Google Scholar
• Watts S (2009) The People’s Tycoon: Henry Ford and the American Century (Vintage, New York).Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations, vol. 3, 1st ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Yoffie DB, Kwak M (2003) Judo Strategy: Turning Your Competitors’ Strength to Your Advantage (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Zajac E, Bazerman M (1991) Blind spots in industry and competitor analysis: Implications of interfirm (mis) perceptions for strategic decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):37–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuzul T, Tripsas M (2020) Start-up inertia vs. flexibility: The role of a founder identity in a nascent industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):395–433.Crossref, Google Scholar