Do Institutional Reforms Perpetuate or Mitigate the Matthew Effect? Intellectual Property Rights and Access to International Alliances

References

• Acemoglu D, Robinson JA (2012) Why Nations Fail (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Ganco M, Ziedonis RH (2009) Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: Implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility. Strategic Management J. 30(13):1349–1374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Soda G, Zaheer A (2012) The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organ. Sci. 23(2):434–448.Link, Google Scholar
• Alcacer J, Oxley J (2014) Learning by supplying. Strategic Management J. 35(2):204–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcacer J, Zhao M (2012) Local R&D strategies and multilocation firms: The role of internal linkages. Management Sci. 58(4):734–753.Link, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antras P, De Gortari A, Itskhoki O (2017) Globalization, inequality and welfare. J. Internat. Econom. 108:387–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aven D (2013) Russia’s economic transition: Challenges, results and overhang. Yale Econom. Rev. (Spring):38–43.Google Scholar
• Baca R (1994) Compulsory patent licensing in Mexico in the 1990. J. Law Tech. 35:183–212.Google Scholar
• Balachandran S, Hernandez E (2018) Networks and innovation: Accounting for structural and institutional sources of recombination in brokerage triads. Organ. Sci. 29(1):80–99.Link, Google Scholar
• Barabási AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartlett CA, Ghoshal S (2000) Going global: Lessons from late movers. Reading 1(3):75–84.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonacich P (1987) Power and centrality: A family of measures. Amer. J. Sociol. 92(5):1170–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Podolny JM, Smith EB (2011) Organizing contests for status: The matthew effect vs. the mark effect. Management Sci. 57(3):439–457.Link, Google Scholar
• Braga CPP (2016) Innovation, Trade and IPRs: Implications for Trade Negotiations (Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY).Google Scholar
• Brandl K, Mudambi R, Scalera VG (2015) The spectacular rise of the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Entrepreneurship Innovation Exchange (December 4), https://eiexchange.com/content/111-the-spectacular-rise-of-the-indian-pharmaceutica.Google Scholar
• Branstetter L, Fisman R, Foley CF, Saggi K (2011) Does intellectual property rights reform spur industrial development? J. Internat. Econom. 83(1):27–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Branstetter LG, Fisman R, Foley CF (2006) Do stronger intellectual property rights increase international technology transfer? Empirical evidence from U. S. firm-level panel data. Quart. J. Econom. 121(1):321–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chittoor R, Kale P, Puranam P (2015) Business groups in developing capital markets: Toward a complementarity perspective. Strategic Management J. 36(9):1277–1296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correa CM (2000) Reforming the intellectual property rights system in Latin America. World Econom. 23(6):851–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dacin MT, Hitt MA, Levitas E (1997) Selecting partners for successful international alliances: Examination of U.S. and Korean firms. J. World Bus. 32(1):3–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Shaver JM (2009) Limitations to interorganizational knowledge acquisition: The paradox of corporate venture capital. Strategic Management J. 30(10):1045–1064.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):660–679.Google Scholar
• Economist Intelligence Unit (2004) Scattering the Seeds of Invention: The Globalisation of Research and Development (Economist Intelligence Unit, London).Google Scholar
• Fang LH, Lerner J, Wu C (2017) Intellectual property rights protection, ownership, and innovation: Evidence from China. Rev. Finance Stud. 30(7):2446–2477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Gao C, Zuzul T, Jones G, Khanna T (2017) Overcoming institutional voids: A reputation-based view of long-run survival. Strategic Management J. 38(11):2147–2167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garlock S (2015) How globalization begets inequality. Harvard Magazine 3:11–12.Google Scholar
• Goldstein P, Straus J (2009) Intellectual Property in Asia: Law, Economics, History and Politics (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Graffin SD, Bundy J, Porac JF, Wade JB, Quinn DP (2013) Falls from grace and the hazards of high status: The 2009 British MP expense scandal and its impact on parliamentary elites. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(3):313–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: A theory of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grigoriou K, Rothaermel FT (2017) Organizing for knowledge generation: Internal knowledge networks and the contingent effect of external knowledge sourcing. Strategic Management J. 38(2):395–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Gargiulo M (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1439–1493.Google Scholar
• Heimeriks KH, Duysters G (2007) Alliance capability as a mediator between experience and alliance performance: An empirical investigation into the alliance capability development process. J. Management Stud. 44(1):25–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfer LR, Alter KJ, Guerzovich MF (2009) Islands of effective international adjudication: Constructing an intellectual property rule of law in the Andean community. Amer. J. Internat. Law 103(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ (2000) The institutional environment for multinational investment. J. Law Econom. Organ. 16(2):334–364.Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ, Zelner BA, Guillén MF (2005) The worldwide diffusion of market-oriented infrastructure reform, 1977–1999. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(6):871–897.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Dacin MT, Levitas E, Arregle JL, Borza A (2000) Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Acad. Management J. 43(3):449–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hufbauer GC, Schott JJ (1992) North American Free Trade: Issues and Recommendations (Peterson Institute, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Roy A (2008) Staging exchange partner choices: When do status and reputation matter? Acad. Management J. 51(3):495–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kale P, Dyer JH, Singh H (2002) Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. Strategic Management J. 23(8):747–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller W, Olney WW (2018) Globalization and executive compensation. NBER Working Paper No. 23384, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Palepu K (2000) Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. J. Finance 55(2):867–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1993) Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 24(4):625–645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kusumadara A (2000) Analysis of the failure of the implementation of intellectual property laws in Indonesia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar
• Kyle MK, McGahan AM (2012) Investments in pharmaceuticals before and after TRIPS. Rev. Econom. Statist. 94(4):1157–1172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Miller SR (2008) Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 19(4):623–646.Link, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (2009) The empirical impact of intellectual property rights on innovation: Puzzles and clues. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(2):343–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Tilcsik A (2013) Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):195–245.Google Scholar
• Maskus K (2000) Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy (Peterson Institute, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science. Science 159(3810):56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.Google Scholar
• Mindruta D, Moeen M, Agarwal R (2016) A two-sided matching approach for partner selection and assessing complementarities in partners’ attributes in inter-firm alliances. Strategic Management J. 37(1):206–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nanda R, Khanna T (2010) Diasporas and domestic entrepreneurs: Evidence from the Indian software industry. J. Econom. Management Strategy 19(4):991–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oxley JE (1999) Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: The impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 38(3):283–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özkan AF (2010) The regulation and patent protection of pharmaceuticals in Turkey. Turkiye Klinikleri J. Medical Ethics Law Hist. 18(1):15–25.Google Scholar
• Parnreiter C (2017) Global cities and the geographical transfer of value. Urban Stud. 56(1):81–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peck J, Tickell A (2002) Neoliberalizing space. Antipode 34(3):380–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penner-Hahn J, Shaver JM (2005) Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management J. 26(2):121–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Turco CJ, Zuckerman EW (2013) Betrayal as market barrier: Identity-based limits to diversification among high-status corporate law firms. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(4):1023–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Platikanova-Gross KS (2006) Essays on some economic implications of intellectual property rights. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1994) Markey uncertainty and social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):458–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (2001) Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):33–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zenger T (2002) Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management J. 23(8):707–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Stern S (2001) Innovation: Location matters. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 42(4):28–36.Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qian Y (2007) Do national patent laws stimulate domestic innovation in a global patenting environment? A cross-country analysis of pharmaceutical patent protection, 1978–2002. Rev. Econom. Statist. 89(3):436–453.Google Scholar
• Quinn DP, Toyoda AM (2008) Does capital account liberalization lead to growth? Rev. Financial Stud. 21(3):1403–1449.Google Scholar
• Ramanna A (2012) Interest groups and patent reform in India. Working paper, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
• Rhee M, Haunschild PR (2006) The liability of good reputation: A study of product recalls in the U.S. automobile industry. Organ. Sci. 17(1):101–117.Link, Google Scholar
• Ryan MP (2010) Patent incentives, technology markets, and public–private bio-medical innovation networks in Brazil. World Development 38(8):1082–1093.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauder M, Lynn F, Podolny JM (2012) Status: Insights from organizational sociology. Annual Rev. Sociol. 38(1):267–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (2009) Understanding the alliance data. Strategic Management J. 30(3):233–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Fang C (2014) When hubs forget, lie, and play favorites: Interpersonal network structure, information distortion, and organizational learning. Strategic Management J. 35(7):974–994.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Phelps CC (2007) Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Sci. 53(7):1113–1126.Link, Google Scholar
• Schotter A, Teagarden M (2014) Protecting intellectual property in China. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 55(4):41–48.Google Scholar
• Shadlen KC (2009) Intellectual property for development in Mexico. Report, Frederick S. Pardee Center for the Study of the Longer-Range Future, Boston University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Shih WC, Wang JC (2013) Will our partner steal our IP? Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(1):137–141.Google Scholar
• Siegel J (2007) Contingent political capital and international alliances: Evidence from South Korea. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):621–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegel J, Choudhury P (2012) A reexamination of tunneling and business groups: New data and new methods. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(6):1763–1798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiglitz JE (2002) Globalization and Its Discontents (Norton, New York).Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):315–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• USPTO (2012) Intellectual Property and the U.S. Economy: Industries in Focus (United States Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Vakili K, McGahan AM (2016) Healthcare’s grand challenge: Stimulating basic science on diseases that primarily afflict the poor. Acad. Management J. 59(6):1917–1939.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vasudeva G, Zaheer A, Hernandez E (2013) The embeddedness of networks: Institutions, structural holes, and innovativeness in the fuel cell industry. Organ. Sci. 24(3):645–663.Link, Google Scholar
• Wacziarg R, Welch KH (2003) Trade liberalization and growth: New evidence. NBER Working Paper No. 10152, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Wacziarg R, Welch KH (2008) Trade liberalization and growth: New evidence. World Bank Econom. Rev. 22(2):187–231.Google Scholar
• Williamson J (2000) What should the World Bank think about the Washington Consensus? World Bank Res. Observer 15(2):251–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, Hernandez E (2011) The geographic scope of the MNC and its alliance portfolio: Resolving the paradox of distance. Global Strategy J. 1(1):109–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao M (2006) Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Management Sci. 52(8):1185–1199.Google Scholar
• Zucker LG (1986) Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920. Res. Organ. Behav. 8(1):53–111.Google Scholar